Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 83 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 42 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 36 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 108 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 220 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 473 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Accelerated Objective Gap and Gradient Norm Convergence for Gradient Descent via Long Steps (2403.14045v4)

Published 20 Mar 2024 in math.OC

Abstract: This work considers gradient descent for L-smooth convex optimization with stepsizes larger than the classic regime where descent can be ensured. The stepsize schedules considered are similar to but differ slightly from the recent silver stepsizes of Altschuler and Parrilo. For one of our stepsize sequences, we prove a $O\left(N{- 1.2716\dots}\right)$ convergence rate in terms of objective gap decrease and for the other, we show the same rate of decrease for squared-gradient-norm decrease. This first result improves on the recent result of Altschuler and Parrilo by a constant factor, while the second results improve on the exponent of the prior best squared-gradient-norm convergence guarantee of $O\left(N{-1}\right)$.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (20)
  1. Accelerated gradient descent via long steps, 2023.
  2. Performance of first-order methods for smooth convex minimization: a novel approach. Mathematical Programming, 145:451–482, 2012.
  3. Smooth strongly convex interpolation and exact worst-case performance of first-order methods. Mathematical Programming, 161:307–345, 2017.
  4. Exact worst-case performance of first-order methods for composite convex optimization. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 27(3):1283–1313, 2017.
  5. An elementary approach to tight worst case complexity analysis of gradient based methods. Math. Program., 201(1–2):63–96, oct 2022.
  6. Antoine Daccache. Performance estimation of the gradient method with fixed arbitrary step sizes. Master’s thesis, Université Catholique de Louvain, 2019.
  7. Diego Eloi. Worst-case functions for the gradient method with fixed variable step sizes. Master’s thesis, Université Catholique de Louvain, 2022.
  8. Branch-and-bound performance estimation programming: A unified methodology for constructing optimal optimization methods. Mathematical Programming, 2023.
  9. Jason Altschuler. Greed, hedging, and acceleration in convex optimization. Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2018.
  10. B. Grimmer. Provably Faster Gradient Descent via Long Steps. arxiv:2307.06324, 2023.
  11. Acceleration by stepsize hedging i: Multi-step descent and the silver stepsize schedule, 2023.
  12. Acceleration by stepsize hedging ii: Silver stepsize schedule for smooth convex optimization, 2023.
  13. Time-reversed dissipation induces duality between minimizing gradient norm and function value, 2023.
  14. Yurii Nesterov. A method for solving the convex programming problem with convergence rate o⁢(1/k2)𝑜1superscript𝑘2o(1/k^{2})italic_o ( 1 / italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ). Proceedings of the USSR Academy of Sciences, 269:543–547, 1983.
  15. A. Nemirovski and D. Yudin. Problem Complexity and Method Efficiency in Optimization. Wiley-Interscience, 1983.
  16. Optimizing the efficiency of first-order methods for decreasing the gradient of smooth convex functions. J. Optim. Theory Appl., 188(1):192–219, jan 2021.
  17. On averaging and extrapolation for gradient descent, 2024.
  18. Smooth strongly convex interpolation and exact worst-case performance of first-order methods. Mathematical Programming, 161:307 – 345, 2015.
  19. Yurii Nesterov. Lectures on Convex Optimization. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, 2nd edition, 2018.
  20. Wolfram Research, Inc. Mathematica, Version 13.3. Champaign, IL, 2023.
Citations (7)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

  • The paper introduces long-step techniques that achieve O(1/N^(1.2716)) convergence for both objective gap and gradient norm in L-smooth convex optimization.
  • It utilizes left-heavy and right-heavy step-size sequences with recursive gluing to rigorously prove accelerated convergence rates.
  • The enhanced convergence reduces computational cost and paves the way for further research in adaptive and non-convex optimization methods.

Accelerated Objective Gap and Gradient Norm Convergence for Gradient Descent via Long Steps

The paper under consideration, "Accelerated Objective Gap and Gradient Norm Convergence for Gradient Descent via Long Steps," introduces innovative techniques to enhance gradient descent's convergence rates for LL-smooth convex optimization problems. The research builds upon existing studies by exploring step-size strategies beyond the conventional "short step-size" regime. The authors present two important findings: leveraging sequences of "long steps," they achieve O(1/N1.2716)O(1/N^{1.2716}) convergence rates for both objective gap and squared-gradient-norm descent, considerably improving upon previously established rates by a constant factor.

Gradient descent is an optimization technique that minimizes a function iteratively by moving in the direction of steepest descent. Classically, for LL-smooth convex functions, gradient descent with appropriately set short step sizes provides an objective gap convergence rate of O(1/N)O(1/N). Recent theoretical advancements reveal the potential to further optimize convergence by modifying step-size sequences. However, these typically compromise the monotonic reduction in objective function value, making analysis more challenging.

This paper addresses these challenges by considering two categories of step-size sequences termed as "left-heavy" (h(k)h^{(k)}) and "right-heavy" (hright(k)h^{(k)}_\text{right}). Both sequences capitalize on specific patterns to achieve faster convergence. The paper proves an accelerated convergence rate for the objective gap and gradient norm, O(1/Nlog2(ϕ1))O(1/N^{\log_2(\phi - 1)}), where ϕ\phi denotes the silver ratio 1+21 + \sqrt{2}. This outcome surpasses the recent silver stepsizes proposed by Altschuler and Parrilo, which achieved a similar rate by a constant factor; it is noteworthy for the objective gap.

The methodology involves meticulous derivation of sufficient conditions and a sequence of recursive constructions. The proof framework heavily utilizes the concept of coercivity and performance estimation problems in assessing smooth convex optimization landscapes, capitalizing on established mathematics around interpolation theory. The authors deploy "recursive gluing" techniques in tandem with specifically crafted certificates to substantiate their convergence claims. This method extends the intricate induction structure used in sequential steps to yield compact and demonstrative proofs for their accelerated methodology.

These findings have significant implications both practically and theoretically. Practically, the enhanced convergence rates can substantially reduce computational costs in large-scale optimization settings. Theoretically, the paper suggests the promise of further exploiting step-size flexibility in routine optimization algorithms beyond current standards. The results present new avenues for exploring optimization landscapes using non-traditional approaches. Future research could focus on expanding these techniques to more general non-convex or stochastic settings, potentially incorporating adaptive strategies for real-time optimization procedures in dynamic environments.

In conclusion, the paper "Accelerated Objective Gap and Gradient Norm Convergence for Gradient Descent via Long Steps" provides profound insight into leveraging structural properties of step-size sequences to enhance convergence rates in gradient descent. The well-founded analysis and significant numerical improvements offered by this paper potentially encourage a rethinking of standard approaches within gradient-based optimization algorithms. As the field of optimization continues to evolve alongside increasing computational demands, such innovative theoretical contributions are invaluable in aligning academic pursuits with practical applications.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.