Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
129 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
28 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Inter-individual and inter-site neural code conversion without shared stimuli (2403.11517v2)

Published 18 Mar 2024 in q-bio.NC and cs.HC

Abstract: Inter-individual variability in fine-grained functional brain organization poses challenges for scalable data analysis and modeling. Functional alignment techniques can help mitigate these individual differences but typically require paired brain data with the same stimuli between individuals, which is often unavailable. We present a neural code conversion method that overcomes this constraint by optimizing conversion parameters based on the discrepancy between the stimulus contents represented by original and converted brain activity patterns. This approach, combined with hierarchical features of deep neural networks (DNNs) as latent content representations, achieves conversion accuracy comparable to methods using shared stimuli. The converted brain activity from a source subject can be accurately decoded using the target's pre-trained decoders, producing high-quality visual image reconstructions that rival within-individual decoding, even with data across different sites and limited training samples. Our approach offers a promising framework for scalable neural data analysis and modeling and a foundation for brain-to-brain communication.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (53)
  1. A massive 7t fmri dataset to bridge cognitive neuroscience and artificial intelligence. Nature neuroscience, 25(1):116–126, 2022.
  2. An empirical evaluation of functional alignment using inter-subject decoding. NeuroImage, 245:118683, 2021.
  3. Pyrcca: regularized kernel canonical correlation analysis in python and its applications to neuroimaging. Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 10:49, 2016.
  4. Deep neural networks rival the representation of primate it cortex for core visual object recognition. PLoS computational biology, 10(12):e1003963, 2014.
  5. A reduced-dimension fmri shared response model. Advances in neural information processing systems, 28, 2015.
  6. Reconstructing visual illusory experiences from human brain activity. Science Advances, 9(46):eadj3906, 2023.
  7. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fmri)“brain reading”: detecting and classifying distributed patterns of fmri activity in human visual cortex. Neuroimage, 19(2):261–270, 2003.
  8. Visual categorization with bags of keypoints. In Workshop on statistical learning in computer vision, ECCV, volume 1, pages 1–2. Prague, 2004.
  9. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 248–255. Ieee, 2009.
  10. fmri of human visual cortex. Nature, 369(6481):525–525, 1994.
  11. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature, 392(6676):598–601, 1998.
  12. Cortical folding patterns and predicting cytoarchitecture. Cerebral cortex, 18(8):1973–1980, 2008.
  13. A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex. Nature, 536(7615):171–178, 2016.
  14. Deep neural networks reveal a gradient in the complexity of neural representations across the ventral stream. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(27):10005–10014, 2015.
  15. A model of representational spaces in human cortex. Cerebral cortex, 26(6):2919–2934, 2016.
  16. A common, high-dimensional model of the representational space in human ventral temporal cortex. Neuron, 72(2):404–416, 2011.
  17. Things: A database of 1,854 object concepts and more than 26,000 naturalistic object images. PloS one, 14(10):e0223792, 2019.
  18. Things-data, a multimodal collection of large-scale datasets for investigating object representations in human brain and behavior. Elife, 12:e82580, 2023.
  19. Inter-individual deep image reconstruction via hierarchical neural code conversion. NeuroImage, 271:120007, 2023.
  20. Generic decoding of seen and imagined objects using hierarchical visual features. Nature communications, 8(1):15037, 2017.
  21. Attention modulates neural representation to render reconstructions according to subjective appearance. Communications Biology, 5(1):34, 2022.
  22. Characterization of deep neural network features by decodability from human brain activity. Scientific data, 6(1):1–12, 2019.
  23. Quantifying variability in neural responses and its application for the validation of model predictions. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 15(2):91–109, 2004.
  24. Caffe: Convolutional architecture for fast feature embedding. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Multimedia, pages 675–678, 2014.
  25. The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17(11):4302–4311, 1997.
  26. Deep supervised, but not unsupervised, models may explain it cortical representation. PLoS computational biology, 10(11):e1003915, 2014.
  27. Cortical regions involved in perceiving object shape. Journal of Neuroscience, 20(9):3310–3318, 2000.
  28. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 25, 2012.
  29. Comparing visual representations across human fmri and computational vision. Journal of vision, 13(13):25–25, 2013.
  30. Human scene-selective areas represent 3d configurations of surfaces. Neuron, 101(1):178–192, 2019.
  31. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014, Proceedings, Part V 13, pages 740–755. Springer, 2014.
  32. David G Lowe. Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. In Proceedings of the seventh IEEE international conference on computer vision, volume 2, pages 1150–1157. Ieee, 1999.
  33. Visual image reconstruction from human brain activity using a combination of multiscale local image decoders. Neuron, 60(5):915–929, 2008.
  34. Yusuke Muraki. Improving visual image reconstruction from brain activity using texture and structure similarity losses. Master’s thesis, Kyoto University, 2024.
  35. Object class recognition and localization using sparse features with limited receptive fields. International Journal of Computer Vision, 80:45–57, 2008.
  36. Measuring shared responses across subjects using intersubject correlation, 2019.
  37. Synthesizing the preferred inputs for neurons in neural networks via deep generator networks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 29, 2016.
  38. Modeling the shape of the scene: A holistic representation of the spatial envelope. International journal of computer vision, 42:145–175, 2001.
  39. Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019.
  40. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International conference on machine learning, pages 8748–8763. PMLR, 2021.
  41. Low-level image properties of visual objects predict patterns of neural response across category-selective regions of the ventral visual pathway. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(26):8837–8844, 2014.
  42. Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nature neuroscience, 2(11):1019–1025, 1999.
  43. Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Science, 268(5212):889–893, 1995.
  44. Robust object recognition with cortex-like mechanisms. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 29(3):411–426, 2007.
  45. End-to-end deep image reconstruction from human brain activity. Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 13:432276, 2019a.
  46. Deep image reconstruction from human brain activity. PLoS computational biology, 15(1):e1006633, 2019b.
  47. Critical assessment of generative ai methods and natural image datasets for visual image reconstruction from brain activity. Retrieved from osf. io/nmfc5, 2023.
  48. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556, 2014.
  49. David C Van Essen. Surface-based approaches to spatial localization and registration in primate cerebral cortex. Neuroimage, 23:S97–S107, 2004.
  50. David C Van Essen. A population-average, landmark-and surface-based (pals) atlas of human cerebral cortex. Neuroimage, 28(3):635–662, 2005.
  51. Modeling semantic encoding in a common neural representational space. Frontiers in neuroscience, 12:378029, 2018.
  52. Inter-subject neural code converter for visual image representation. NeuroImage, 113:289–297, 2015.
  53. Performance-optimized hierarchical models predict neural responses in higher visual cortex. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 111(23):8619–8624, 2014.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.