Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Tracing the Roots of Facts in Multilingual Language Models: Independent, Shared, and Transferred Knowledge (2403.05189v1)

Published 8 Mar 2024 in cs.CL and cs.AI

Abstract: Acquiring factual knowledge for LLMs (LMs) in low-resource languages poses a serious challenge, thus resorting to cross-lingual transfer in multilingual LMs (ML-LMs). In this study, we ask how ML-LMs acquire and represent factual knowledge. Using the multilingual factual knowledge probing dataset, mLAMA, we first conducted a neuron investigation of ML-LMs (specifically, multilingual BERT). We then traced the roots of facts back to the knowledge source (Wikipedia) to identify the ways in which ML-LMs acquire specific facts. We finally identified three patterns of acquiring and representing facts in ML-LMs: language-independent, cross-lingual shared and transferred, and devised methods for differentiating them. Our findings highlight the challenge of maintaining consistent factual knowledge across languages, underscoring the need for better fact representation learning in ML-LMs.

Unveiling Cross-Lingual Knowledge Transfer in Multilingual LLMs

Introduction

The quest for understanding how multilingual LLMs (ML-LMs) such as mBERT and XLM-R acquire and represent factual knowledge across languages has been a topic of significant interest in the field of NLP. These models are known for their ability to transfer knowledge across languages, leveraging shared representations to aid low-resource languages. However, the mechanisms behind factual knowledge acquisition and representation remain opaque. This paper addresses the gap by probing ML-LMs to uncover how factual knowledge is acquired, focusing on language-independent knowledge, cross-lingual shared, and cross-lingual transferred representations.

Probing Multilingual Factual Knowledge

Utilizing the mLAMA dataset, an extensive investigation was conducted into the model's ability to recognize factual knowledge in various languages. The results reveal a moderate correlation between probing performance and the amount of training data, highlighting a nuanced relationship between data availability and factual knowledge acquisition in ML-LMs. Interestingly, the paper also identified localized factual knowledge clusters among languages, suggesting that geographical proximity and shared culture might play a role in knowledge transfer.

Investigating Factual Representation in ML-LMs

Through neuron-level analysis, three patterns of factual knowledge representation were discerned: language-independent, cross-lingual shared, and cross-lingual transferred. This differentiation sheds light on the complexity of knowledge representation within ML-LMs. It appears that while some facts are stored in a language-specific manner, others are shared or transferred across languages, underscoring the diversity in knowledge encoding strategies.

Tracing the Roots of Factual Knowledge

To further understand the formation of cross-lingual representations, the paper traced the roots of facts back to their sources in Wikipedia, the primary training corpus for mBERT. Surprisingly, a significant number of facts correctly predicted by the model were not directly present in the corpus, suggesting the model's ability to infer or transfer knowledge across languages. This finding emphasizes the models' capability beyond mere memorization, pointing toward sophisticated inference mechanisms at play.

Implications and Future Directions

This research provides valuable insights into the mechanics of cross-lingual knowledge transfer in ML-LMs, revealing how models represent and acquire factual knowledge across languages. The discovery of language-independent, cross-lingual shared, and transferred knowledge representations opens new avenues for enhancing the cross-lingual capabilities of ML-LMs. Future work could focus on refining probing techniques to better capture the model's knowledge representation strategies and exploring methods to enhance cross-lingual fact learning, especially for low-resource languages.

The findings underscore the complexity of factual knowledge representation in ML-LMs and highlight the need for further research to unravel the intricate mechanisms of knowledge acquisition and cross-lingual transfer. As the field of NLP continues to advance, understanding these mechanisms will be crucial for developing more robust and versatile multilingual models.

Conclusion

This paper provides a thorough analysis of factual knowledge representation in multilingual LLMs, uncovering the nuanced mechanisms of knowledge acquisition and representation. The findings highlight the model's capability to leverage cross-lingual knowledge transfer, contributing to the understanding of ML-LMs' inner workings. This research marks a step forward in unraveling the complexities of multilingual LLMs, laying the groundwork for future advancements in the field.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (36)
  1. Omer Antverg and Yonatan Belinkov. 2022. On the pitfalls of analyzing individual neurons in language models. In International Conference on Learning Representations.
  2. The geometry of multilingual language model representations. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 119–136, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  3. Finding universal grammatical relations in multilingual BERT. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 5564–5577, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  4. Unsupervised cross-lingual representation learning at scale. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 8440–8451, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  5. Emerging cross-lingual structure in pretrained language models. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 6022–6034, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  6. Knowledge neurons in pretrained transformers. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 8493–8502, Dublin, Ireland. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  7. Editing factual knowledge in language models. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 6491–6506, Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  8. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pages 4171–4186, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  9. Analyzing individual neurons in pre-trained language models. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 4865–4880, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  10. T-REx: A large scale alignment of natural language with knowledge base triples. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018), Miyazaki, Japan. European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
  11. Constanza Fierro and Anders Søgaard. 2022. Factual consistency of multilingual pretrained language models. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022, pages 3046–3052, Dublin, Ireland. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  12. Discovering language-neutral sub-networks in multilingual language models. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 7560–7575, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  13. Transformer feed-forward layers are key-value memories. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 5484–5495, Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  14. Benjamin Heinzerling and Kentaro Inui. 2021. Language models as knowledge bases: On entity representations, storage capacity, and paraphrased queries. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume, pages 1772–1791, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  15. Not all languages are created equal in LLMs: Improving multilingual capability by cross-lingual-thought prompting. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023, pages 12365–12394, Singapore. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  16. X-FACTR: Multilingual factual knowledge retrieval from pretrained language models. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 5943–5959, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  17. How can we know what language models know? Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 8:423–438.
  18. Cross-lingual ability of multilingual bert: An empirical study. In The Eighth International Conference on Learning Representations.
  19. Multilingual LAMA: Investigating knowledge in multilingual pretrained language models. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume, pages 3250–3258, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  20. Amr Keleg and Walid Magdy. 2023. DLAMA: A framework for curating culturally diverse facts for probing the knowledge of pretrained language models. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023, pages 6245–6266, Toronto, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  21. Language models as fact checkers? In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER), pages 36–41, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  22. Fast model editing at scale. In The Tenth International Conference on Learning Representations.
  23. Does transliteration help multilingual language modeling? In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EACL 2023, pages 670–685, Dubrovnik, Croatia. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  24. First align, then predict: Understanding the cross-lingual ability of multilingual BERT. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume, pages 2214–2231, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  25. Exploratory model analysis using data-driven neuron representations. In Proceedings of the Fourth BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP, pages 518–528, Punta Cana, Dominican Republic. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  26. Language models as knowledge bases? In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pages 2463–2473, Hong Kong, China. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  27. How multilingual is multilingual BERT? In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 4996–5001, Florence, Italy. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  28. Machel Reid and Mikel Artetxe. 2023. On the role of parallel data in cross-lingual transfer learning. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023, pages 5999–6006, Toronto, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  29. BLOOM: A 176b-parameter open-access multilingual language model.
  30. Attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 30. Curran Associates, Inc.
  31. Injecting knowledge base information into end-to-end joint entity and relation extraction and coreference resolution. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021, pages 1952–1957, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  32. Finding skill neurons in pre-trained transformer-based language models. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 11132–11152, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  33. Shijie Wu and Mark Dredze. 2019. Beto, bentz, becas: The surprising cross-lingual effectiveness of BERT. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pages 833–844, Hong Kong, China. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  34. mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformer. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 483–498, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  35. GeoMLAMA: Geo-diverse commonsense probing on multilingual pre-trained language models. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 2039–2055, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  36. MoEfication: Transformer feed-forward layers are mixtures of experts. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022, pages 877–890, Dublin, Ireland. Association for Computational Linguistics.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Xin Zhao (160 papers)
  2. Naoki Yoshinaga (17 papers)
  3. Daisuke Oba (5 papers)
Citations (5)
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com