Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Seamless Virtual Reality with Integrated Synchronizer and Synthesizer for Autonomous Driving (2403.03541v1)

Published 6 Mar 2024 in cs.RO

Abstract: Virtual reality (VR) is a promising data engine for autonomous driving (AD). However, data fidelity in this paradigm is often degraded by VR inconsistency, for which the existing VR approaches become ineffective, as they ignore the inter-dependency between low-level VR synchronizer designs (i.e., data collector) and high-level VR synthesizer designs (i.e., data processor). This paper presents a seamless virtual reality SVR platform for AD, which mitigates such inconsistency, enabling VR agents to interact with each other in a shared symbiotic world. The crux to SVR is an integrated synchronizer and synthesizer IS2 design, which consists of a drift-aware lidar-inertial synchronizer for VR colocation and a motion-aware deep visual synthesis network for augmented reality image generation. We implement SVR on car-like robots in two sandbox platforms, achieving a cm-level VR colocalization accuracy and 3.2% VR image deviation, thereby avoiding missed collisions or model clippings. Experiments show that the proposed SVR reduces the intervention times, missed turns, and failure rates compared to other benchmarks. The SVR-trained neural network can handle unseen situations in real-world environments, by leveraging its knowledge learnt from the VR space.

PDF HTML Abstract

An Expert Analysis on "Seamless Virtual Reality with Integrated Synchronizer and Synthesizer for Autonomous Driving"

The paper "Seamless Virtual Reality with Integrated Synchronizer and Synthesizer for Autonomous Driving" introduces a novel approach to enhancing the fidelity of datasets used for the development and validation of autonomous driving (AD) systems through an advanced virtual reality (VR) platform. This platform, termed as Seamless Virtual Reality (SVR), integrates a synchronizing and synthesizing mechanism (IS²) to bridge the gap between virtual simulation and real-world operation.

Overview of the Proposed SVR System

The SVR platform aims to address the inconsistencies often observed in traditional VR approaches by tightly coupling low-level data collection with high-level data processing. The integrated synchronizer and synthesizer (IS²) framework consists of a drift-aware lidar-inertial synchronizer (LIS) and a motion-aware deep visual synthesis network (DVSN). These components are strategically combined to allow VR agents to interact realistically in a symbiotic environment, thereby enhancing the fidelity and applicability of the generated data to real-world autonomous driving scenarios.

The LIS component plays a critical role in ensuring colocation accuracy between virtual and real-world entities, achieving centimeter-level precision. On the other hand, the DVSN is responsible for augmenting reality (AR) images with high precision, minimizing image deviation to a low 3.2%. This rigorous focus on accuracy and consistency significantly reduces events of missed detection or collision, which are crucial for the reliability of autonomous systems.

Experimental Validation and Strong Numerical Outcomes

The authors implemented their system on car-like robots within two distinct sandbox environments, using these platforms to train AD neural networks. Their experiments demonstrate that SVR-trained imitation learning models reduced the number of interventions, missed turns, and failure rates when compared to benchmarks. Notably, the system was capable of handling previously unseen real-world situations, showing a unique capability of utilizing knowledge gained in the virtual environment to improve real-world performance.

This ability is quantitatively reflected in their results, where the SVR system, through the enhanced dataset incorporating background variations, improved the collision avoidance success rate to an average of 87% in critical scenarios.

Implications and Future Directions

This research highlights significant practical implications for the field of autonomous driving, especially in addressing the scarcity of boundary conditions in real-world datasets. By leveraging a seamless virtual-augmented reality approach, the paper proposes a viable path forward for enhancing the data-driven development process for autonomous systems without the infeasibility of exhaustive real-world testing.

Theoretically, the integration of system components at varying levels of data processing offers insights into designing robust VRAD systems which are resilient to virtual-real discrepancies. These insights suggest a promising future where autonomous systems can be more reliably trained in virtual environments, reducing costs and increasing safety.

Looking forward, the SVR platform could serve as a foundation for further developments, potentially incorporating advanced machine learning paradigms such as reinforcement learning to adaptively enhance and optimize the dataset in real-time. The authors' future work could also explore integration with large-scale, multi-modal AI models to further push the boundaries of what augmented and virtual reality mean in the context of autonomous driving.

Overall, the paper provides a comprehensive exploration into an innovative VR-based paradigm for autonomous driving, offering robust solutions to existing challenges while setting a promising trajectory for future research and application.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown Bookmark Chat Bubble Oval Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Chat (Pro)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (27)
  1. S. Feng, X. Yan, H. Sun, Y. Feng, and H. X. Liu, “Intelligent driving intelligence test for autonomous vehicles with naturalistic and adversarial environment,” Nature Communications, vol. 12, no. 748, 2021.
  2. Tesla, “AI & Robotics,” https://www.tesla.com/AI, 2023.
  3. NVIDIA, “NVIDIA DRIVE end-to-end solutions for autonomous vehicles,” urlhttps://developer.nvidia.com/drive, 2023.
  4. A. Dosovitskiy, G. Ros, F. Codevilla, A. Lopez, and V. Koltun, “Carla: An open urban driving simulator,” in Conference on Robot Learning, 2017, pp. 1–16.
  5. S. Wang, C. Li, D. W. K. Ng, Y. C. Eldar, H. V. Poor, Q. Hao, and C. Xu, “Federated deep learning meets autonomous vehicle perception: Design and verification,” IEEE Network, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 16–25, 2023.
  6. Y. Li, D. Ma, Z. An, Z. Wang, Y. Zhong, S. Chen, and C. Feng, “V2X-Sim: Multi-agent collaborative perception dataset and benchmark for autonomous driving,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 10 914–10 921, 2022.
  7. W. Li, C. Pan, R. Zhang, J. Ren, Y. Ma, J. Fang, F. Yan, Q. Geng, X. Huang, H. Gong et al., “AADS: Augmented autonomous driving simulation using data-driven algorithms,” Science Robotics, vol. 4, no. 28, 2019.
  8. M.-Y. Liu, T. Breuel, and J. Kautz, “Unsupervised image-to-image translation networks,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30, 2017.
  9. Z. Yang, Y. Chai, D. Anguelov, Y. Zhou, P. Sun, D. Erhan, S. Rafferty, and H. Kretzschmar, “SurfelGAN: Synthesizing realistic sensor data for autonomous driving,” in IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2020, pp. 11 118–11 127.
  10. S. Feng, H. Sun, X. Yan, H. Zhu, Z. Zou, S. Shen, and H. X. Liu, “Dense reinforcement learning for safety validation of autonomous vehicles,” Nature, vol. 615, no. 7953, pp. 620–627, 2023.
  11. S. Feng, Y. Feng, X. Yan, S. Shen, S. Xu, and H. X. Liu, “Safety assessment of highly automated driving systems in test tracks: A new framework,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 144, p. 105664, 2020.
  12. Z. Zheng, X. Han, X. Xia, L. Gao, H. Xiang, and J. Ma, “OpenCDA-ROS: Enabling seamless integration of simulation and real-world cooperative driving automation,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 2023.
  13. Intel, “ROS/ROS2 bridge for CARLA simulator,” https://github.com/carla-simulator/ros-bridge, 2023.
  14. J. Delmerico, R. Poranne, F. Bogo, H. Oleynikova, E. Vollenweider, S. Coros, J. Nieto, and M. Pollefeys, “Spatial computing and intuitive interaction: Bringing mixed reality and robotics together,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 45–57, 2022.
  15. C. Li and et al., “iGibson 2.0: Object-centric simulation for robot learning of everyday household tasks,” in Conference on Robot Learning, 2022, pp. 455–465.
  16. W. Xu, Y. Cai, D. He, J. Lin, and F. Zhang, “FAST-LIO2: Fast direct lidar-inertial odometry,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 2053–2073, 2022.
  17. M. Bloesch, M. Burri, S. Omari, M. Hutter, and R. Siegwart, “Iterated extended kalman filter based visual-inertial odometry using direct photometric feedback,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 36, no. 10, p. 1053–1072, 2017.
  18. J. Zhang and S. Singh, “LOAM: Lidar odometry and mapping in real-time.” in Robotics: Science and Systems, vol. 2, no. 9.   Berkeley, CA, 2014, pp. 1–9.
  19. I. Rocco, M. Cimpoi, R. Arandjelović, A. Torii, T. Pajdla, and J. Sivic, “Neighbourhood consensus networks,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 31, 2018.
  20. R. Han, S. Wang, S. Wang, Z. Zhang, Q. Zhang, Y. C. Eldar, Q. Hao, and J. Pan, “RDA: An accelerated collision-free motion planner for autonomous navigation in cluttered environments,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, no. 3, pp. 1715–1722, Mar. 2023.
  21. A. Kirillov, E. Mintun, N. Ravi, H. Mao, C. Rolland, L. Gustafson, T. Xiao, S. Whitehead, A. C. Berg, W.-Y. Lo, P. Dollár, and R. Girshick, “Segment anything,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.02643, 2023.
  22. D. Lowe, “Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints,” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 91–110, 2012.
  23. P. F. Alcantarilla, A. Bartoli, and A. J. Davison, “KAZE features,” in European Conference on Computer Vision.   Springer, 2012, pp. 214–227.
  24. S. Manivasagam, S. Wang, K. Wong, W. Zeng, M. Sazanovich, S. Tan, B. Yang, W.-C. Ma, and R. Urtasun, “LidarSIM: Realistic lidar simulation by leveraging the real world,” in IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Mar. 2020, pp. 11 167–11 176.
  25. F. Codevilla, M. Müller, A. López, V. Koltun, and A. Dosovitskiy, “End-to-end driving via conditional imitation learning,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2018, pp. 4693–4700.
  26. R. R. Selvaraju, M. Cogswell, A. Das, R. Vedantam, D. Parikh, and D. Batra, “Grad-CAM: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization,” in IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2017, pp. 618–626.
  27. J. Tobin, R. Fong, A. Ray, J. Schneider, W. Zaremba, and P. Abbeel, “Domain randomization for transferring deep neural networks from simulation to the real world,” in IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Sep. 2017, pp. 23–30.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (7)
  1. He Li (88 papers)
  2. Ruihua Han (17 papers)
  3. Zirui Zhao (18 papers)
  4. Wei Xu (536 papers)
  5. Qi Hao (53 papers)
  6. Shuai Wang (466 papers)
  7. Chengzhong Xu (98 papers)
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

YouTube