Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
169 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Federated Deep Learning Approach for Privacy-Preserving Real-Time Transient Stability Predictions in Power Systems (2403.03126v1)

Published 5 Mar 2024 in eess.SY and cs.SY

Abstract: Maintaining the privacy of power system data is essential for protecting sensitive information and ensuring the operation security of critical infrastructure. Therefore, the adoption of centralized deep learning (DL) transient stability assessment (TSA) frameworks can introduce risks to electric utilities. This is because these frameworks make utility data susceptible to cyber threats and communication issues when transmitting data to a central server for training a single TSA model. Additionally, the centralized approach demands significant computational resources, which may not always be readily available. In light of these challenges, this paper introduces a federated DL-based TSA framework designed to identify the operating states of the power system. Instead of local utilities transmitting their data to a central server for centralized model training, they independently train their own TSA models using their respective datasets. Subsequently, the parameters of each local TSA model are sent to a central server for model aggregation, and the resulting model is shared back with the local clients. This approach not only preserves the integrity of local utility data, making it resilient against cyber threats but also reduces the computational demands for local TSA model training. The proposed approach is tested on four local clients each having the IEEE 39-bus test system.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (13)
  1. S. Wang, L. Li, and P. Dehghanian, “Distributed intelligence for online situational awareness in power grids,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 2499–2515, 2021.
  2. M. Hijazi and P. Dehghanian, “Spatio-temporal insights into recent electricity outages in the us: Drivers, trends, and impacts,” in 2022 North American Power Symposium (NAPS), pp. 1–6, IEEE, 2022.
  3. K. Wang, Z. Chen, W. Wei, X. Sun, S. Mei, Y. Xu, T. Zhu, and J. Liu, “Power system transient stability assessment based on deep bayesian active learning,” in 2022 IEEE/IAS Industrial and Commercial Power System Asia (I&CPS Asia), pp. 1692–1696, IEEE, 2022.
  4. Z. Shi, W. Yao, L. Zeng, J. Wen, J. Fang, X. Ai, and J. Wen, “Convolutional neural network-based power system transient stability assessment and instability mode prediction,” Applied Energy, vol. 263, p. 114586, 2020.
  5. J. James, D. J. Hill, A. Y. Lam, J. Gu, and V. O. Li, “Intelligent time-adaptive transient stability assessment system,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1049–1058, 2017.
  6. I. F. Azhar, L. M. Putranto, and R. Irnawan, “Development of PMU-based transient stability detection methods using CNN-LSTM considering time series data measurement,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 21, p. 8241, 2022.
  7. M. Senyuk, M. Safaraliev, F. Kamalov, and H. Sulieman, “Power system transient stability assessment based on machine learning algorithms and grid topology,” Mathematics, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 525, 2023.
  8. M. Hijazi, P. Dehghanian, and S. Wang, “Transfer learning for transient stability predictions in modern power systems under enduring topological changes,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2023.
  9. B. McMahan, E. Moore, D. Ramage, S. Hampson, and B. A. y Arcas, “Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data,” in Artificial intelligence and statistics, pp. 1273–1282, PMLR, 2017.
  10. C. Ren, H. Yu, R. Yan, Q. Li, Y. Xu, D. Niyato, and Z. Y. Dong, “Secfedsa: A secure differential privacy-based federated learning approach for smart cyber-physical grid stability assessment,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2023.
  11. C. Ren, R. Yan, M. Xu, H. Yu, Y. Xu, D. Niyato, and Z. Y. Dong, “Qfdsa: A quantum-secured federated learning system for smart grid dynamic security assessment,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2023.
  12. J. Konečnỳ, H. B. McMahan, F. X. Yu, P. Richtárik, A. T. Suresh, and D. Bacon, “Federated learning: Strategies for improving communication efficiency,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.05492, 2016.
  13. PowerWrold, “PowerWorld Corporation.” [Online]. Available: https://www.powerworld.com/, 2023.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.