Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 75 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 51 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 95 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 193 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 467 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

What do we learn from inverting CLIP models? (2403.02580v1)

Published 5 Mar 2024 in cs.CV and cs.LG

Abstract: We employ an inversion-based approach to examine CLIP models. Our examination reveals that inverting CLIP models results in the generation of images that exhibit semantic alignment with the specified target prompts. We leverage these inverted images to gain insights into various aspects of CLIP models, such as their ability to blend concepts and inclusion of gender biases. We notably observe instances of NSFW (Not Safe For Work) images during model inversion. This phenomenon occurs even for semantically innocuous prompts, like "a beautiful landscape," as well as for prompts involving the names of celebrities.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (32)
  1. Evaluating clip: towards characterization of broader capabilities and downstream implications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.02818, 2021.
  2. Multimodal datasets: misogyny, pornography, and malignant stereotypes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.01963, 2021.
  3. Into the laions den: Investigating hate in multimodal datasets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.03449, 2023.
  4. Conceptual 12M: Pushing web-scale image-text pre-training to recognize long-tail visual concepts. In CVPR, 2021.
  5. Identifying and mitigating model failures through few-shot clip-aided diffusion generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.05464, 2023.
  6. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp.  248–255. Ieee, 2009.
  7. Inverting visual representations with convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp.  4829–4837, 2016.
  8. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929, 2020.
  9. Erasing concepts from diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.07345, 2023.
  10. Plug-in inversion: Model-agnostic inversion for vision with data augmentations. 2021.
  11. What do vision transformers learn? a visual exploration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.06727, 2022.
  12. Multimodal neurons in artificial neural networks. Distill, 6(3):e30, 2021.
  13. Openclip, July 2021. URL https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5143773. If you use this software, please cite it as below.
  14. Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. In International conference on machine learning, pp.  448–456. pmlr, 2015.
  15. Stable bias: Analyzing societal representations in diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.11408, 2023.
  16. Image segmentation using text and image prompts. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  7086–7096, 2022.
  17. Clipcap: Clip prefix for image captioning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.09734, 2021.
  18. Inceptionism: Going deeper into neural networks. 2015.
  19. Glide: Towards photorealistic image generation and editing with text-guided diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.10741, 2021.
  20. Clip-guided vision-language pre-training for question answering in 3d scenes. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  5606–5611, 2023.
  21. Styleclip: Text-driven manipulation of stylegan imagery. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp.  2085–2094, 2021.
  22. Analyzing bias in diffusion-based face generation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.06402, 2023.
  23. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.00020, 2021.
  24. Zero-shot text-to-image generation. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp.  8821–8831. PMLR, 2021.
  25. Red-teaming the stable diffusion safety filter. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.04610, 2022.
  26. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp.  10684–10695, 2022.
  27. Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language understanding. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:36479–36494, 2022.
  28. Safe latent diffusion: Mitigating inappropriate degeneration in diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  22522–22531, 2023.
  29. Yfcc100m: The new data in multimedia research. Communications of the ACM, 59(2):64–73, 2016.
  30. Mlp-mixer: An all-mlp architecture for vision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.01601, 2021.
  31. When are lemons purple? the concept association bias of clip. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.12043, 2022.
  32. Dreaming to distill: Data-free knowledge transfer via deepinversion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  8715–8724, 2020.
Citations (2)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates the inversion technique to uncover CLIP's internal semantic alignments and robust concept blending capabilities.
  • It uncovers the risk of NSFW content generation linked to training data biases, emphasizing the need for advanced content filtering.
  • The study exposes inherent gender biases and highlights how training data scale and quality directly impact the fidelity of model inversions.

Insights from Inverting CLIP Models: Unpacking the Black Box

Introduction to Inverting CLIP Models

The paper of CLIP models through the prism of inversion offers a unique vantage point into their inner workings. Unlike conventional approaches that primarily analyze output performances on benchmark tasks, inversion delves directly into the model's representational space. By inverting CLIP, we effectively reverse-engineer the model's learning, allowing us to generate images that CLIP aligns with specific text prompts. This process unveils the nuanced semantic alignments and biases encoded within the model, offering a richer understanding of its capabilities and limitations.

Blending Concepts with CLIP

One of the remarkable findings from inverting CLIP models is their adeptness at concept blending. Similar to state-of-the-art generative models, CLIP can synthesize images that seamlessly meld disparate concepts into coherent visuals. This capability is indicative of CLIP's robust understanding and representation of complex, multi-faceted ideas. Furthermore, the consistent observation of concept blending across various CLIP architectures underscores this attribute as a fundamental characteristic of the model.

NSFW Content Generation: A Cautionary Tale

A significant revelation from inverting CLIP models is their propensity to generate NSFW content, even from innocuous prompts. This tendency raises substantial concerns regarding the training data's composition and the necessity for rigorous content filtering. The inadvertent generation of explicit imagery underlines the challenges of training on web-scale datasets and highlights the importance of developing more sophisticated data curation methodologies.

Gender Bias Exposed Through Inversion

Inversion also sheds light on the gender biases inherent within CLIP models. When inverting images with neutral prompts, there is a marked tendency for the generated images to reflect stereotypical gender roles or attributes. This observation is alarming and signifies the deep-rooted biases present in the dataset CLIP was trained on. It calls for a concerted effort to address and mitigate these biases to ensure fairer, more equitable model outcomes.

Training Data Scale and Quality of Inversions

The paper further explores the impact of training data scale on the quality of inversions. It demonstrates that larger datasets result in more detailed and coherent inversions, suggesting that the vastness and diversity of the training data play crucial roles in the model's generative capabilities. This finding underscores the importance of not just the quantity but also the quality of data in training robust models.

Limitations and Considerations

While this inversion-based analysis offers profound insights into CLIP models, it is essential to note its limitations. Primarily, the paper examines CLIP in a generative context, which may not directly correlate with its performances in non-generative applications. Also, the findings concerning biases and NSFW content generation emphasize the need for more responsible data curation practices. It is crucial to approach these findings with an understanding that they reflect not just the model's characteristics but also the nature of the data it was trained on.

Conclusion

The inversion of CLIP models unveils a spectrum of insights, from their impressive ability to blend concepts to the less desirable discovery of biases and inappropriate content generation. These findings highlight the intricacies of training on web-scale datasets and underscore the necessity for thoughtful consideration in model training practices. As we move forward, it is imperative to address the revealed issues responsibly to harness the full potential of models like CLIP while ensuring their ethical and fair use.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Github Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube