Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
158 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Facility Location Games with Scaling Effects (2402.18908v3)

Published 29 Feb 2024 in cs.GT, cs.AI, cs.MA, and econ.TH

Abstract: We take the classic facility location problem and consider a variation, in which each agent's individual cost function is equal to their distance from the facility multiplied by a scaling factor which is determined by the facility placement. In addition to the general class of continuous scaling functions, we also provide results for piecewise linear scaling functions which can effectively approximate or model the scaling of many real world scenarios. We focus on the objectives of total and maximum cost, describing the computation of the optimal solution. We then move to the approximate mechanism design setting, observing that the agents' preferences may no longer be single-peaked. Consequently, we characterize the conditions on scaling functions which ensure that agents have single-peaked preferences. Under these conditions, we find a characterization of continuous, strategyproof, and anonymous mechanisms, and compute the total and maximum cost approximation ratios achievable by these mechanisms.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (22)
  1. Facility location problem with capacity constraints: Algorithmic and mechanism design perspectives. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 34. 1806–1813.
  2. The capacity constrained facility location problem. Games and Economic Behavior 124 (2020), 478–490.
  3. Strategyproof and Proportionally Fair Facility Location. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Web and Internet Economics.
  4. S. Barberà and M. Jackson. 1994. A characterization of strategy-proof social choice functions for economies with pure public goods. Social Choice and Welfare 11, 3 (1994), 241–252.
  5. K. C. Border and J. S. Jordan. 1983. Straightforward Elections, Unanimity and Phantom Voters. The Review of Economic Studies 50, 1 (1983), 153–170.
  6. Mechanism Design for Facility Location Problems: A Survey. In 30th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2021). 4356–4365.
  7. Strategy-proof approximation mechanisms for an obnoxious facility game on networks. Theoretical Computer Science 497 (2013), 154–163.
  8. On Voting and Facility Location. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation. 269–286.
  9. Truthful aggregation of budget proposals. Journal of Economic Theory 193 (2021), 105234.
  10. A. Gibbard. 1973. Manipulation of voting schemes: A general result. Econometrica 41, 4 (1973), 587–601.
  11. S. Goel and W. Hann-Caruthers. 2023. Optimality of the coordinate-wise median mechanism for strategyproof facility location in two dimensions. Social Choice and Welfare 61, 1 (2023), 11–34.
  12. New characterizations of strategy-proofness under single-peakedness. Mathematical Programming (2023), 1–32.
  13. Facility location games with entrance fees. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 37. 5797–5804.
  14. J. Massó and I. Moreno De Barreda. 2011. On strategy-proofness and symmetric single-peakedness. Games and Economic Behavior 72, 2 (2011), 467 –484.
  15. E. Miyagawa. 2001. Locating libraries on a street. Social Choice and Welfare 18, 3 (2001), 527–541.
  16. H. Moulin. 1980. On strategy-proofness and single peakedness. Public Choice (1980).
  17. K. Nehring and C. Puppe. 2006. The structure of strategy-proof social choice — Part I: General characterization and possibility results on median spaces. Journal of Economic Theory 135, 1 (2006), 269–305.
  18. K. Nehring and C. Puppe. 2007. Efficient and strategy-proof voting rules: A characterization. Games and Economic Behavior 59, 1 (2007), 132–153.
  19. Pareto optimality, anonymity, and strategy-proofness in location problems. International Journal of Game Theory 21 (1992), 221–235.
  20. A. D. Procaccia and M. Tennenholtz. 2013. Approximate Mechanism Design without Money. ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation 1, 4, Article 18 (2013).
  21. M. A. Satterthwaite. 1975. Strategy-proofness and Arrow’s conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions. Journal of Economic Theory 10 (1975), 187–217.
  22. J. Schummer and R. V. Vohra. 2002. Strategy-proof Location on a Network. Journal of Economic Theory 104 (2002), 405–428.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com