Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
143 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Mental Models of Meeting Goals: Supporting Intentionality in Meeting Technologies (2402.18526v1)

Published 28 Feb 2024 in cs.HC

Abstract: Ineffective meetings due to unclear goals are major obstacles to productivity, yet support for intentionality is surprisingly scant in our meeting and allied workflow technologies. To design for intentionality, we need to understand workers' attitudes and practices around goals. We interviewed 21 employees of a global technology company and identified contrasting mental models of meeting goals: meetings as a means to an end, and meetings as an end in themselves. We explore how these mental models impact how meeting goals arise, goal prioritization, obstacles to considering goals, and how lack of alignment around goals may create tension between organizers and attendees. We highlight the challenges in balancing preparation, constraining scope, and clear outcomes, with the need for intentional adaptability and discovery in meetings. Our findings have implications for designing systems which increase effectiveness in meetings by catalyzing intentionality and reducing tension in the organisation of meetings.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (86)
  1. Mohammed Alhamadi. 2020. Challenges, Strategies and Adaptations on Interactive Dashboards. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 368–371. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340631.3398678
  2. Understanding workplace meetings: A qualitative taxonomy of meeting purposes. Management Research Review 37, 9 (Jan. 2014), 791–814. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-03-2013-0067 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  3. Effectiveness in top management group meetings: The role of goal clarity, focused communication, and learning behavior: Effectiveness in top management meetings. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 51, 3 (Jan. 2010), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00769.x
  4. Eric P.S. Baumer. 2015. Reflective Informatics: Conceptual Dimensions for Designing Technologies of Reflection. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 585–594. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702234
  5. Reviewing reflection: on the use of reflection in interactive system design. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems (DIS ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598598
  6. Revisiting Reflection in HCI: Four Design Resources for Technologies that Support Reflection. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 6, 1 (March 2022), 2:1–2:27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3517233
  7. Meeting (the) Pandemic: Videoconferencing Fatigue and Evolving Tensions of Sociality in Enterprise Video Meetings During COVID-19. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 32, 2 (June 2023), 347–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-022-09451-6
  8. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101.
  9. Adam Bulley and Daniel L. Schacter. 2020. Deliberating trade-offs with the future. Nature human behaviour 4, 3 (March 2020), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0834-9
  10. Large scale analysis of multitasking behavior during remote meetings. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.
  11. Meeting design characteristics and attendee perceptions of staff/team meeting quality. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 15, 1 (2011), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021549 Place: US Publisher: Educational Publishing Foundation.
  12. Noël Craven and Dirk Mahling. 1995. Goals and Processes: A Task Basis for Projects and Workflows. In Proceedings of Conference on Organizational Computing Systems (Milpitas, California, USA) (COCS ’95). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1145/224019.224045
  13. Meeting Effectiveness and Inclusiveness in Remote Collaboration. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (April 2021), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449247
  14. How a silver bullet may lose its shine. Commun. ACM 46, 8 (Aug. 2003), 96–101. https://doi.org/10.1145/859670.859676
  15. Videoconference Fatigue: A Conceptual Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, 4 (Feb. 2022), 2061. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042061
  16. Beyond self-reflection: introducing the concept of rumination in personal informatics. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 25, 3 (2021), 601–616.
  17. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics 5, 1 (2016), 1–4.
  18. Video-mediated communication. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
  19. Meetings at work: Perceived effectiveness and recommended improvements. Journal of Business Research 68, 9 (Sept. 2015), 2015–2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.02.015
  20. Peter M. Gollwitzer and Paschal Sheeran. 2006. Implementation Intentions and Goal Achievement: A Meta‐analysis of Effects and Processes. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 38. Elsevier, 69–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38002-1
  21. Making Space for Social Time: Supporting Conversational Transitions Before, During, and After Video Meetings. In 2022 Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work (CHIWORK 2022). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3533406.3533417
  22. J. Grudin. 1994. Computer-supported cooperative work: history and focus. Computer 27, 5 (1994), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1109/2.291294
  23. Lars Hallnäs and Johan Redström. 2001. Slow Technology – Designing for Reflection. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 5, 3 (Aug. 2001), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00000019
  24. Steve Harrison (Ed.). 2009. Media Space 20+ Years of Mediated Life (1st ed.). Springer, London.
  25. An Automated Meeting Scheduling System That Utilizes User Preferences. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Marina del Rey, California, USA) (AGENTS ’97). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 308–315. https://doi.org/10.1145/267658.267733
  26. John Heritage. 2013. Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. John Wiley & Sons.
  27. Janet Holmes. 2003. Small talk at work: Potential problems for workers with an intellectual disability. Research on Language and Social Interaction 36, 1 (2003), 65–84.
  28. Co-Located Collaborative Visual Analytics around a Tabletop Display. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18, 5 (2012), 689–702. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2011.287
  29. Encouraging Work in Citizen Science: Experiments in Goal Setting and Anchoring. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion (CSCW ’16 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 297–300. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818052.2869129
  30. Starr Roxanne Hiltz Jerry Fjermestad. 2000. Group Support Systems: A Descriptive Evaluation of Case and Field Studies. Journal of Management Information Systems 17, 3 (2000), 115–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2000.11045657
  31. Joseph Kim and Julie A Shah. 2016. Improving team’s consistency of understanding in meetings. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 46, 5 (2016), 625–637.
  32. Bot in the Bunch: Facilitating Group Chat Discussion by Improving Efficiency and Participation with a Chatbot. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376785
  33. Designing for workplace reflection: a chat and voice-based conversational agent. In Proceedings of the 2018 designing interactive systems conference. 881–894.
  34. Reflection Companion: A Conversational System for Engaging Users in Reflection on Physical Activity. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 2, 2, Article 70 (jul 2018), 26 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3214273
  35. Anastasia Kuzminykh and Sean Rintel. 2020. Classification of Functional Attention in Video Meetings. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376546
  36. Tine Köhler and Markus Gölz. 2015. Meetings across cultures: Cultural differences in meeting expectations and processes. In The Cambridge handbook of meeting science. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, US, 119–149. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107589735.007
  37. Ann Langley. 1995. Between’paralysis by analysis’ and’extinction by instinct’. MIT Sloan Management Review 36, 3 (1995), 63.
  38. Gary P Latham and Edwin A Locke. 1991. Self-regulation through goal setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 2 (Dec. 1991), 212–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90021-K
  39. Perceived Meeting Effectiveness: The Role of Design Characteristics. Journal of Business and Psychology 24, 1 (March 2009), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-009-9092-6
  40. Nale Lehmann-Willenbrock and Annika L. Meinecke. 2017. Team-Meeting Behaviors in Germany and the United States. In The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0262 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0262.
  41. RT Lenz and Marjorie A Lyles. 1985. Paralysis by analysis: is your planning system becoming too rational? Long Range Planning 18, 4 (1985), 64–72.
  42. Exploring Design Opportunities for Reflective Conversational Agents to Reduce Compulsive Smartphone Use. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (CUI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3571884.3604305
  43. Alexandra Luong and Steven G. Rogelberg. 2005. Meetings and More Meetings: The Relationship Between Meeting Load and the Daily Well-Being of Employees. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 9, 1 (2005), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.9.1.58 Place: US Publisher: Educational Publishing Foundation.
  44. Palmira López-Fresno and Rosalía Cascón-Pereira. 2022. What is the Purpose of this Meeting? The hidden meanings of the meeting announcement. Organization Studies 43, 8 (Aug. 2022), 1297–1325. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406211040216 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  45. Interpersonal trust in organizations. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management.
  46. Joseph E McGrath. 1991. Time, interaction, and performance (TIP) A Theory of Groups. Small group research 22, 2 (1991), 147–174.
  47. Cliona McParland and Regina Connolly. 2020. Dataveillance in the Workplace: Managing the Impact of Innovation. Business Systems Research : International journal of the Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy 11, 1 (June 2020), 106–124. https://hrcak.srce.hr/ojs/index.php/bsr/article/view/12670 Number: 1.
  48. Enabling Good Work Habits in Software Developers through Reflective Goal-Setting. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 47, 9 (Sept. 2021), 1872–1885. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2019.2938525 Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.
  49. Microsoft. 2023. Work Trend Index | Will AI Fix Work? https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/worklab/will-ai-fix-work
  50. Advancing the Understanding and Measurement of Workplace Stress in Remote Information Workers from Passive Sensors and Behavioral Data. In 2022 10th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII). 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII55700.2022.9953824
  51. What was hybrid? a systematic review of hybrid collaboration and meetings research. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.06172 (2021).
  52. Karin Niemantsverdriet and Thomas Erickson. 2017. Recurring Meetings: An Experiential Account of Repeating Meetings in a Large Organization. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW (Dec. 2017), 84:1–84:17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134719
  53. Carol T. Nixon and Glenn E. Littlepage. 1992. Impact of meeting procedures on meeting effectiveness. Journal of Business and Psychology 6, 3 (1992), 361–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01126771
  54. Donald A. Norman. 1993. Things that Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes in the Age of the Machine. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Google-Books-ID: Gr9fQgAACAAJ.
  55. Electronic meeting systems. Commun. ACM 34, 7 (1991), 40–61. Publisher: ACM New York, NY, USA.
  56. A systematic review of social presence: Definition, antecedents, and implications. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 5 (2018), 409295.
  57. G.K. Raikundalia. 1998. A Web tool for asynchronous, collaborative development of electronic meeting agendas. In Proceedings. 3rd Asia Pacific Computer Human Interaction (Cat. No.98EX110). 374–379. https://doi.org/10.1109/APCHI.1998.704464
  58. Extending Chatbots to Probe Users: Enhancing Complex Decision-Making Through Probing Conversations. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (CUI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3543829.3543832
  59. Leon Reicherts and Yvonne Rogers. 2020. Do Make me Think!: How CUIs Can Support Cognitive Processes. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces. ACM, Bilbao Spain, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3405755.3406157
  60. Howard Rheingold. 1985. Tools for Thought: The People and Ideas behind the Next Computer Revolution. Simon & Schuster Trade.
  61. Steven G Rogelberg. 2018. The surprising science of meetings: How you can lead your team to peak performance. Oxford University Press, USA.
  62. Employee satisfaction with meetings: A contemporary facet of job satisfaction. Human Resource Management: Published in Cooperation with the School of Business Administration, The University of Michigan and in alliance with the Society of Human Resources Management 49, 2 (2010), 149–172.
  63. ”Not Another Meeting!” Are Meeting Time Demands Related to Employee Well-Being? Journal of Applied Psychology 91, 1 (2006), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.83
  64. N.C. Romano and J.F. Nunamaker. 2001. Meeting analysis: findings from research and practice. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 13 pp.–. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2001.926253
  65. MeetingCoach: An Intelligent Dashboard for Supporting Effective & Inclusive Meetings. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445615
  66. The promise and peril of parallel chat in video meetings for work. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451793
  67. Kjeld Schmidt. 2013. Cooperative Work and Coordinative Practices: Contributions to the Conceptual Foundations of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated.
  68. Five theoretical lenses for conceptualizing the role of meetings in organizational life. In The Cambridge handbook of meeting science. Cambridge University Press New York, NY, 20–46.
  69. Charles PR Scott and Jessica L Wildman. 2015. Culture, communication, and conflict: A review of the global virtual team literature. Leading global teams: Translating multidisciplinary science to practice (2015), 13–32.
  70. Paschal Sheeran and Thomas L. Webb. 2016. The Intention-Behavior Gap: The Intention-Behavior Gap. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 10, 9 (Sept. 2016), 503–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12265
  71. Recurring distributed software maintenance meetings: toward an initial understanding. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 21–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3528579.3529179
  72. An Empirical Study of the Effectiveness of Telepresence as a Business Meeting Mode. Information Technology and Management 17 (Dec. 2016), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-015-0221-9
  73. How shall we meet? Understanding the importance of meeting mode capabilities for different meeting objectives. Information & Management 58, 1 (Jan. 2021), 103393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103393
  74. Anselm L Strauss and Juliet Corbin. 2004. Open coding. Social research methods: A reader (2004), 303–306.
  75. Rhythm of Work: Mixed-methods Characterization of Information Workers Scheduling Preferences and Practices. http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.08104 arXiv:2309.08104 [cs] version: 1.
  76. Perspectives: Creating Inclusive and Equitable Hybrid Meeting Experiences. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 7, CSCW2, Article 351 (oct 2023), 25 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3610200
  77. The new future of work. Microsoft Internal Report (2020).
  78. Paul D Trapnell and Jennifer D Campbell. 1999. Private self-consciousness and the five-factor model of personality: distinguishing rumination from reflection. Journal of personality and social psychology 76, 2 (1999), 284.
  79. John E Tropman. 2003. Making meetings work: Achieving high quality group decisions. Sage.
  80. Distributed Group Support Systems. MIS Quarterly 17, 4 (1993), 399–417. http://www.jstor.org/stable/249585
  81. Wendelien van Eerde and Claudia Buengeler. 2015. Meetings all over the world: Structural and psychological characteristics of meetings in different countries. In The Cambridge handbook of meeting science. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, US, 177–202. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107589735.009
  82. Wilbert van Vree. 2019. Formalisation and Informalisation of Meeting Manners. In Civilisation and Informalisation: Connecting Long-Term Social and Psychic Processes, Cas Wouters and Michael Dunning (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 291–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00798-0_11
  83. The Conversational Circumplex: Identifying, prioritizing, and pursuing informational and relational motives in conversation. Current Opinion in Psychology 44 (April 2022), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.10.001
  84. Participate or else!: The effect of participation in decision-making in meetings on employee engagement. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research 67, 1 (2015), 65.
  85. The Role of Different Types of Conversations for Meeting Success. IEEE Pervasive Computing 20, 4 (2021), 35–42.
  86. The Role of Different Types of Conversations for Meeting Success. IEEE Pervasive Computing 20, 4 (2021), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2021.3115879
Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com