Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

The CoExplorer Technology Probe: A Generative AI-Powered Adaptive Interface to Support Intentionality in Planning and Running Video Meetings (2405.18239v2)

Published 28 May 2024 in cs.HC

Abstract: Effective meetings are effortful, but traditional videoconferencing systems offer little support for reducing this effort across the meeting lifecycle. Generative AI (GenAI) has the potential to radically redefine meetings by augmenting intentional meeting behaviors. CoExplorer, our novel adaptive meeting prototype, preemptively generates likely phases that meetings would undergo, tools that allow capturing attendees' thoughts before the meeting, and for each phase, window layouts, and appropriate applications and files. Using CoExplorer as a technology probe in a guided walkthrough, we studied its potential in a sample of participants from a global technology company. Our findings suggest that GenAI has the potential to help meetings stay on track and reduce workload, although concerns were raised about users' agency, trust, and possible disruption to traditional meeting norms. We discuss these concerns and their design implications for the development of GenAI meeting technology.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (117)
  1. Khalid Al-Omar and Dimitrios Rigas. 2009. A user performance evaluation of personalised menus. In 2009 Second International Conference on the Applications of Digital Information and Web Technologies. IEEE, London, United Kingdom, 104–109. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICADIWT.2009.5273847
  2. Pedro Antunes and Carlos J. Costa. 2003. From Genre Analysis to the Design of Meetingware. In Proceedings of the 2003 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work (Sanibel Island, Florida, USA) (GROUP ’03). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 302–310. https://doi.org/10.1145/958160.958209
  3. MeetCues: Supporting online meetings experience. In 2020 IEEE Visualization Conference (VIS). IEEE, 236–240.
  4. Summaries, Highlights, and Action items: Design, implementation and evaluation of an LLM-powered meeting recap system. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.15793 arXiv:2307.15793 [cs].
  5. Jeremy N. Bailenson. 2021. Nonverbal Overload: A Theoretical Argument for the Causes of Zoom Fatigue. Technology, Mind, and Behavior 2, 1 (Feb. 2021). https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000030
  6. Karolina Balogova and Duncan Brumby. 2022. How Do You Zoom?: A Survey Study of How Users Configure Video-Conference Tools for Online Meetings. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual Meeting of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work (Durham, NH, USA) (CHIWORK ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 5, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3533406.3533408
  7. Satanjeev Banerjee and Alexander Rudnicky. 2004. Using simple speech-based features to detect the state of a meeting and the roles of the meeting participants. In Eighth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing.
  8. Effectiveness in top management group meetings: The role of goal clarity, focused communication, and learning behavior: Effectiveness in top management meetings. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 51, 3 (Jan. 2010), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00769.x
  9. Meeting (the) Pandemic: Videoconferencing Fatigue and Evolving Tensions of Sociality in Enterprise Video Meetings During COVID-19. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (Nov. 2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-022-09451-6
  10. A multimodal-sensor-enabled room for unobtrusive group meeting analysis. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction. 347–355.
  11. Cutting to the Chase: Improving Meeting Effectiveness by Focusing on the Agenda. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Chicago, Illinois, USA) (CSCW ’04). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 346–349. https://doi.org/10.1145/1031607.1031664
  12. Peter Brusilovsky. 1996. Methods and techniques of adaptive hypermedia. (1996).
  13. Bill Buxton. 2009. Mediaspace – Meaningspace – Meetingspace. In Media Space 20 + Years of Mediated Life, Steve Harrison (Ed.). Springer, London, 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-483-6_13
  14. How is ChatGPT’s behavior changing over time? http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.09009 arXiv:2307.09009 [cs].
  15. An adaptive multi-disciplinary telemedicine system. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Image Management and Communication (IMAC 95). 244–249. https://doi.org/10.1109/IMAC.1995.532593
  16. KAIROS: Talking heads and moving bodies for successful meetings. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications. 30–36.
  17. Optimizing agent-based meeting scheduling through preference estimation. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 16, 7 (Oct. 2003), 727–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2003.09.009
  18. Beyond Show of Hands: Engaging Viewers via Expressive and Scalable Visual Communication in Live Streaming. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 109, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445419
  19. Meeting design characteristics and attendee perceptions of staff/team meeting quality. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 15, 1 (March 2011), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021549
  20. ComFeel: Productivity is a matter of the senses too. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 4, 4 (2020), 1–21.
  21. Meeting Effectiveness and Inclusiveness in Remote Collaboration. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (April 2021), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449247
  22. Ritwik Dasgupta. 2018. Voice User Interface Design: Moving from GUI to Mixed Modal Interaction. Apress, Berkeley, CA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-4125-7
  23. How a silver bullet may lose its shine. Commun. ACM 46, 8 (Aug. 2003), 96–101. https://doi.org/10.1145/859670.859676
  24. Emily Dean. 2023. 60+ Women in Tech Statistics You Need to Know in 2023 – Closing the Gaps — techopedia.com. https://www.techopedia.com/women-in-tech-statistics.
  25. Agenda and emergence: Contingent and planned activities in a meeting. Journal of Pragmatics 42, 6 (June 2010), 1700–1718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.10.006
  26. Algorithm Aversion: People Erroneously Avoid Algorithms After Seeing Them Err. (2014), 13.
  27. WebRobot: Web Robotic Process Automation using Interactive Programming-by-Demonstration. http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.09993 arXiv:2203.09993 [cs].
  28. Doodle. 2019. The Doodle State of Meetings Report 2019. Technical Report. Doodle. https://doodle.com/en/resources/research-and-reports-/the-state-of-meetings-2019/
  29. UX Design Innovation: Challenges for Working with Machine Learning as a Design Material. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025739 event-place: Denver, Colorado, USA.
  30. Why is a third of your time wasted in meetings? Journal of Management Development 16, 9 (Jan. 1997), 672–676. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621719710190185 Publisher: MCB UP Ltd.
  31. Ephemeral adaptation: the use of gradual onset to improve menu selection performance. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Boston MA USA, 1655–1664. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518956
  32. Improving meeting inclusiveness using speech interruption analysis. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 887–895.
  33. Predictability and accuracy in adaptive user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Florence Italy, 1271–1274. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357252
  34. Meeting Details: Methods to instrument meetings and use agenda voting to make them more effective. In meeting of the Center for Integrated Facility Engineering, Stanford (no. TR147).
  35. Voting on the agenda: the key to social efficient meetings. International Journal of Project Management 23, 1 (Jan. 2005), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.05.003
  36. Meetings at work: Perceived effectiveness and recommended improvements. Journal of Business Research 68, 9 (Sept. 2015), 2015–2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.02.015
  37. Paul Geyer. 2020. Do directors prepare well for board meetings? Governance Directions 72, 6 (Aug. 2020), 272–276. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.263991955412630 Publisher: Governance Institute of Australia.
  38. Work from Home & Productivity: Evidence from Personnel & Analytics Data on IT Professionals. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3843197
  39. Making Space for Social Time: Supporting Conversational Transitions Before, During, and After Video Meetings. In 2022 Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work (CHIWORK 2022). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3533406.3533417
  40. MirrorBlender: Supporting Hybrid Meetings with a Malleable Video-Conferencing System. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 451, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445698
  41. Zixuan Guo and Tomoo Inoue. 2019. Using a Conversational Agent to Facilitate Non-Native Speaker’s Active Participation in Conversation. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI EA ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3313075
  42. Spatiality in Videoconferencing: Trade-Offs between Efficiency and Social Presence. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Banff, Alberta, Canada) (CSCW ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1145/1180875.1180937
  43. Meeting effectiveness and inclusiveness: large-scale measurement, identification of key features, and prediction in real-world remote meetings. arXiv:2304.00652 [cs.HC]
  44. Activity-centric support for ad hoc knowledge work: a case study of co-activity manager. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2013).
  45. Co-activity manager: integrating activity-based collaboration into the desktop interface. In Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces. ACM, Capri Island Italy, 398–401. https://doi.org/10.1145/2254556.2254633
  46. Donghan Hu and Sang Won Lee. 2020. Scrapbook: Screenshot-based Bookmark for Effective Curation of Digital Resources. In Adjunct Publication of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, Virtual Event USA, 46–48. https://doi.org/10.1145/3379350.3416181
  47. FluidMeet: Enabling Frictionless Transitions Between In-Group, Between-Group, and Private Conversations During Virtual Breakout Meetings. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 511, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517558
  48. Avan R. Jassawalla and Hemant C. Sashittal. 2000. Cross-Functional Dynamics in New Product Development. Research-Technology Management 43, 1 (2000), 46–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2000.11671331
  49. Jason Jerald and Mike Daily. 2002. Eye Gaze Correction for Videoconferencing. In Proceedings of the 2002 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (New Orleans, Louisiana) (ETRA ’02). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1145/507072.507088
  50. Starr Roxanne Hiltz Jerry Fjermestad. 2000. Group Support Systems: A Descriptive Evaluation of Case and Field Studies. Journal of Management Information Systems 17, 3 (2000), 115–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2000.11045657
  51. Assessing the Accuracy and Reliability of AI-Generated Medical Responses: An Evaluation of the Chat-GPT Model. preprint. In Review. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2566942/v1
  52. Jon Crowcroft. 1997. Supporting Videoconferencing on the Internet. In Video-Mediated Communication, Kathleen E. Finn, Abigail J. Sellen, and Sylvia B. Wilbur (Eds.). 519–540.
  53. Towards Ideal Window Layouts for Multi-Party, Gaze-Aware Desktop Videoconferencing. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2011 (St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada) (GI ’11). Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society, Waterloo, CAN, 119–126.
  54. Markup as you talk: establishing effective memory cues while still contributing to a meeting. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 349–358. https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145260
  55. Joseph Kim and Julie A Shah. 2016. Improving team’s consistency of understanding in meetings. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 46, 5 (2016), 625–637.
  56. Designing and Executing Effective Meetings with Codified Best Facilitation Practices. Cambridge University Press, 483–503. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107589735.021
  57. Using Speech Contribution Visualization to Improve Team Performance of Divergent Thinking Tasks. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Creativity and Cognition (Virtual Event, USA) (C&C ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 319–324. https://doi.org/10.1145/3591196.3596824
  58. How to hold an effective meeting. International Journal of Surgery Oncology 2, 5 (June 2017), e22–e22. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJ9.0000000000000022
  59. Robert E. Kraut and Robert S. Fish. 1997. Prospects for Video Telephony. In Video-Mediated Communication, Kathleen E. Finn, Abigail J. Sellen, and Sylvia B. Wilbur (Eds.). 541–561.
  60. Optimizing Virtual Team Meetings: Attendee and Leader Perspectives. American Journal of Health Promotion 35, 5 (June 2021), 744–747. https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171211007955e
  61. Lacretia Taylor. 2023. Zoom introduces Zoom AI Companion — available at no additional cost with paid Zoom user accounts. https://news.zoom.us/zoom-ai-companion/
  62. Martha Lewis and Melanie Mitchell. 2024. Using counterfactual tasks to evaluate the generality of analogical reasoning in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.08955 (2024).
  63. Stargazer: An Interactive Camera Robot for Capturing How-To Videos Based on Subtle Instructor Cues. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Hamburg Germany, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580896
  64. Patina: dynamic heatmaps for visualizing application usage. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Paris France, 3227–3236. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466442
  65. Matt Martin. 2020. The State of Meetings in 2020 | Clockwise. https://www.getclockwise.com/blog/the-state-of-meetings-in-2020
  66. Moira McGregor and John C Tang. 2017. More to meetings: challenges in using speech-based technology to support meetings. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing. 2208–2220.
  67. Lucid Meetings. 2022. How many meetings are there per day in 2022? (And should you care?) - The Lucid Meetings Blog. https://blog.lucidmeetings.com/blog/how-many-meetings-are-there-per-day-in-2022/
  68. Microsoft. [n. d.]. In the Office, It’s All About Moments That Matter. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/worklab/in-the-office-it-is-all-about-moments-that-matter
  69. Microsoft. 2023a. Get started with Copilot in Microsoft Teams meetings - Microsoft Support. https://products.support.services.microsoft.com/en-us/office/get-started-with-copilot-in-microsoft-teams-meetings-0bf9dd3c-96f7-44e2-8bb8-790bedf066b1
  70. Microsoft. 2023b. Work Trend Index | Will AI Fix Work? https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/worklab/will-ai-fix-work
  71. Shaila M. Miranda and Robert P. Bostrom. 1993. The Impact of Group Support Systems on Group Conflict and Conflict Management. Journal of Management Information Systems 10, 3 (1993), 63–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1993.11518011
  72. Comparing Humans, GPT-4, and GPT-4V on abstraction and reasoning tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.09247 (2023).
  73. Challenging but Connective: Large-Scale Characteristics of Synchronous Collaboration Across Time Zones. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 611, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581141
  74. “I’ll get that off the audio”: a case study of salvaging multimedia meeting records. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI ’97). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 202–209. https://doi.org/10.1145/258549.258704
  75. Automatically detecting action items in audio meeting recordings. In Proceedings of the 7th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue (SigDIAL ’06). Association for Computational Linguistics, USA, 96–103.
  76. Detecting low rapport during natural interactions in small groups from non-verbal behaviour. In 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 153–164.
  77. Saeid Nahavandi. 2017. Trusted Autonomy Between Humans and Robots: Toward Human-on-the-Loop in Robotics and Autonomous Systems. IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Magazine 3, 1 (Jan. 2017), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSMC.2016.2623867
  78. Reducing Disruption from Subtle Information Delivery during a Conversation: Mode and Bandwidth Investigation. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2013).
  79. Combinatorial Optimization of Graphical User Interface Designs. Proc. IEEE 108, 3 (2020), 434–464. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2020.2969687
  80. CoExplorer: Generative AI Powered 2D and 3D Adaptive Interfaces to Support Intentionality in Video Meetings. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1145/3613905.3650797
  81. AdaM: Adapting Multi-User Interfaces for Collaborative Environments in Real-Time. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173758 arXiv:1803.01166 [cs].
  82. SemanticOn: Specifying Content-Based Semantic Conditions for Web Automation Programs. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, Bend OR USA, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3526113.3545691
  83. Qatalog. [n. d.]. Killing Time Report | language.work. https://language.work/research/killing-time-at-work/
  84. Steven G. Rogelberg. 2019. The Surprising Science of Meetings: How You Can Lead Your Team to Peak Performance. Oxford University Press, New York.
  85. “In This Online Environment, We’re Limited”: Exploring Inclusive Video Conferencing Design for Signers. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 609, 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517488
  86. Meetingcoach: An intelligent dashboard for supporting effective & inclusive meetings. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.
  87. CoCo: Collaboration Coach for Understanding Team Dynamics during Video Conferencing. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 1, 4, Article 160 (jan 2018), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3161186
  88. Advait Sarkar. 2023. Will Code Remain a Relevant User Interface for End-User Programming with Generative AI Models?. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on New Ideas, New Paradigms, and Reflections on Programming and Software (¡conf-loc¿, ¡city¿Cascais¡/city¿, ¡country¿Portugal¡/country¿, ¡/conf-loc¿) (Onward! 2023). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1145/3622758.3622882
  89. Participatory prompting: a user-centric research method for eliciting AI assistance opportunities in knowledge workflows. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group (PPIG 2023).
  90. USER ACCEPTANCE OF PROACTIVE VOICE ASSISTANT BEHAVIOR. Konferenz Elektronische Sprachsignalverarbeitung (2020).
  91. Mental Models of Meeting Goals: Supporting Intentionality in Meeting Technologies. In Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.
  92. Mental Models of Meeting Goals: Supporting Intentionality in Meeting Technologies. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642670
  93. Sandip Sen and Edmund H. Durfee. 1998. A Formal Study of Distributed Meeting Scheduling. Group Decision and Negotiation 7, 3 (May 1998), 265–289. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008639617029
  94. User-context for adaptive user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces. ACM, Honolulu Hawaii USA, 321–324. https://doi.org/10.1145/1216295.1216357
  95. GroupBar: The TaskBar evolved. (2003).
  96. How shall we meet? Understanding the importance of meeting mode capabilities for different meeting objectives. Information & Management 58, 1 (2021), 103393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103393
  97. Real-Time Adaptation of Context-Aware Intelligent User Interfaces, for Enhanced Situational Awareness. IEEE Access 10 (2022), 23367–23393. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3152743
  98. Artificial intelligence (AI) for user experience (UX) design: a systematic literature review and future research agenda. Information Technology & People ahead-of-print, ahead-of-print (Jan. 2023). https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-07-2022-0519
  99. Barbara J. Streibel. 2003. The manager’s guide to effective meetings. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  100. Jan Svennevig. 2012. The agenda as resource for topic introduction in workplace meetings. Discourse Studies 14, 1 (Feb. 2012), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611427204
  101. John Tang. 2021. Understanding the Telework Experience of People with Disabilities. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW1, Article 30 (apr 2021), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449104
  102. Perspectives: Creating Inclusive and Equitable Hybrid Meeting Experiences. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 7, CSCW2, Article 351 (oct 2023), 25 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3610200
  103. Craig Tashman. 2006. WindowScape: a task oriented window manager. In Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, Montreux Switzerland, 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1145/1166253.1166266
  104. Craig Tashman and W. Keith Edwards. 2012. WindowScape: Lessons learned from a task-centric window manager. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 19, 1 (March 2012), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1145/2147783.2147791
  105. Adapting User Interfaces with Model-based Reinforcement Learning. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445497
  106. Impact of structured meetings on the learning of faculty members. 26, 03 (2012).
  107. GAZE-2: Conveying Eye Contact in Group Video Conferencing Using Eye-Controlled Camera Direction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA) (CHI ’03). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 521–528. https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642702
  108. Understanding social signals in multi-party conversations: Automatic recognition of socio-emotional roles in the AMI meeting corpus. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. IEEE, 374–379.
  109. Understanding User Perceptions of Proactive Smart Speakers. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 5, 4 (Dec. 2021), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3494965
  110. Orchestration for Group Videoconferencing: An Interactive Demonstrator. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (Istanbul, Turkey) (ICMI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 72–73. https://doi.org/10.1145/2663204.2669624
  111. AI Chains: Transparent and Controllable Human-AI Interaction by Chaining Large Language Model Prompts. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (¡conf-loc¿, ¡city¿New Orleans¡/city¿, ¡state¿LA¡/state¿, ¡country¿USA¡/country¿, ¡/conf-loc¿) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 385, 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517582
  112. CrossTalk: Intelligent Substrates for Language-Oriented Interaction in Video-Based Communication and Collaboration. https://doi.org/10.1145/3586183.3606773 arXiv:2308.03311 [cs].
  113. FocalSpace: Multimodal Activity Tracking, Synthetic Blur and Adaptive Presentation for Video Conferencing. In Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Spatial User Interaction (Los Angeles, California, USA) (SUI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1145/2491367.2491377
  114. So Much More than “Chit-Chat”: A Closer Look at Premeeting Talk. In The Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science, Joseph A. Allen, Nale Lehmann-Willenbrock, and Steven G. Rogelberg (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107589735.008
  115. Understanding Circumstances for Desirable Proactive Behaviour of Voice Assistants: The Proactivity Dilemma. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Conversational User Interfaces. ACM, Glasgow United Kingdom, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3543829.3543834
  116. The Role of Different Types of Conversations for Meeting Success. IEEE Pervasive Computing 20, 4 (2021), 35–42.
  117. Predicting meeting success with nuanced emotions. IEEE Pervasive Computing 21, 2 (2022), 51–59.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Payod Panda (4 papers)
  2. Lev Tankelevitch (10 papers)
  3. Sean Rintel (14 papers)
  4. Gun Woo Warren Park (1 paper)
Citations (2)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets