Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Cause and Effect: Can Large Language Models Truly Understand Causality? (2402.18139v3)

Published 28 Feb 2024 in cs.CL and cs.AI

Abstract: With the rise of LLMs(LLMs), it has become crucial to understand their capabilities and limitations in deciphering and explaining the complex web of causal relationships that language entails. Current methods use either explicit or implicit causal reasoning, yet there is a strong need for a unified approach combining both to tackle a wide array of causal relationships more effectively. This research proposes a novel architecture called Context Aware Reasoning Enhancement with Counterfactual Analysis(CARE CA) framework to enhance causal reasoning and explainability. The proposed framework incorporates an explicit causal detection module with ConceptNet and counterfactual statements, as well as implicit causal detection through LLMs. Our framework goes one step further with a layer of counterfactual explanations to accentuate LLMs understanding of causality. The knowledge from ConceptNet enhances the performance of multiple causal reasoning tasks such as causal discovery, causal identification and counterfactual reasoning. The counterfactual sentences add explicit knowledge of the not caused by scenarios. By combining these powerful modules, our model aims to provide a deeper understanding of causal relationships, enabling enhanced interpretability. Evaluation of benchmark datasets shows improved performance across all metrics, such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 scores. We also introduce CausalNet, a new dataset accompanied by our code, to facilitate further research in this domain.

PDF HTML Abstract

Enhancing LLMs with CARE-CA for Advanced Causal Reasoning

Introduction

LLMs are becoming indispensable in diverse applications, from decision-making systems to personalized virtual assistants. However, their ability to understand and navigate causal relationships—a fundamental aspect of human cognition—remains a critical limitation. This paper introduces the Context-Aware Reasoning Enhancement with Counterfactual Analysis (CARE-CA) framework, designed to address this gap by enhancing LLMs' capabilities in interpreting and generating causal relationships.

Approach

The CARE-CA framework represents a novel methodology aiming to refine LLMs' understanding of causality through an integration of explicit and implicit causal reasoning processes. The framework leverages:

  • Contextual Knowledge Integrator (CKI): Uses ConceptNet to enrich LLMs' reasoning with pertinent external knowledge, providing a contextual understanding crucial for identifying causal links.
  • Counterfactual Reasoning Enhancer (CRE): Introduces hypothetical scenarios to refine causal inferences, crucial for distinguishing correlation from causation.
  • Context-Aware Prompting Mechanism (CAPM): Employs enriched context and counterfactual insights to guide LLMs towards more accurate causal reasoning.

The theoretical foundation combined with empirical investigation using datasets like CausalNet offers a rigorous evaluation of LLMs' causal reasoning capabilities and showcases improvements across key metrics.

Evaluation

The experimental evaluation encompassed several datasets tailored to different aspects of causal reasoning:

  • For Causal Relationship Identification, datasets like CLadder and Com2Sense were employed, demonstrating CARE-CA's superiority in identifying explicit causal links.
  • In Counterfactual Reasoning, the TimeTravel dataset tested the framework's competence in hypothetical scenario analysis, highlighting its advanced reasoning capabilities.
  • Causal Discovery was evaluated using the COPA and e-care datasets, showcasing CARE-CA's ability to uncover implicit causal relationships.

Crucially, the introduction of the CausalNet dataset alongside comprehensive evaluation metrics like accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 scores has not only facilitated a deeper understanding of LLMs' causal reasoning capabilities but has also set new benchmarks for future advancements.

Analysis

An analysis of the results indicates that CARE-CA significantly enhances LLMs' understanding of causality, as evidenced by its superior performance across multiple causal reasoning tasks. The integration of external knowledge and counterfactual reasoning within this framework offers a balanced approach, marrying data-driven inferencing with a knowledge-based understanding of causality. Moreover, human evaluation results further corroborate the model's efficacy in generating coherent and logically consistent causal explanations, underlining its potential for applications requiring nuanced understanding and interpretation of causal relationships.

Conclusion and Future Work

The CARE-CA framework marks an advancement in the quest to imbue LLMs with a more nuanced and sophisticated understanding of causality. Its implementation showcases marked improvements in LLMs' ability to identify, discover, and explain causal relationships, moving closer to achieving more reliable and transparent AI systems. The paper also opens avenues for future research, including fine-tuning strategies, domain-specific adaptations, and the exploration of multimodal and multilingual datasets, aiming to further refine LLMs' causal reasoning faculties.

Limitations and Ethics

Despite significant advancements, limitations related to computational resources, language specificity, and domain adaptability prompt further investigation. Ethically, the research underscores the importance of mitigating biases and ensuring transparent use of LLMs, highlighting ongoing responsibilities to address ethical considerations in AI development.

Insights for Future Research

This research opens several promising directions, including the investigation into hybrid models that seamlessly integrate large-scale knowledge bases with LLMs, and the exploration of domain-specific fine-tuning to bolster performance further. The creation of more comprehensive and diverse datasets like CausalNet paves the way for a deeper understanding and enhancement of LLMs' causal reasoning abilities.

In conclusion, the CARE-CA framework represents a significant stride towards bridging the gap in LLMs' understanding of causality. Its potential to impact a wide range of applications underscores the necessity for continued exploration and innovation within the AI and LLM domains.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown Bookmark Chat Bubble Oval Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Chat (Pro)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (31)
  1. Unsupervised cross-lingual representation learning at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.02116.
  2. Louis Anthony Cox. 2024. An ai assistant to help review and improve causal reasoning in epidemiological documents. Global Epidemiology, 7:100130.
  3. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805.
  4. e-care: a new dataset for exploring explainable causal reasoning. Submitted on 12 May 2022.
  5. Large language models: A comprehensive survey of its applications, challenges, limitations, and future prospects.
  6. Inductive reasoning in humans and large language models. Cognitive Systems Research, 83:101155.
  7. Deberta: Decoding-enhanced bert with disentangled attention. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.03654.
  8. Benchmarking and explaining large language model-based code generation: A causality-centric approach.
  9. Mistral 7b. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06825.
  10. Cladder: Assessing causal reasoning in language models.
  11. Cladder: Assessing causal reasoning in language models. NeurIPS 2023; updated with CLadder dataset v1.5.
  12. Causal reasoning and large language models: Opening a new frontier for causality.
  13. Albert: A lite bert for self-supervised learning of language representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.11942.
  14. The magic of if: Investigating causal reasoning abilities in large language models of code.
  15. Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692.
  16. OpenAI. https://platform.openai.com/docs/introduction.
  17. Ellie Pavlick. 2023. Symbols and grounding in large language models. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 381.
  18. Leveraging large language models for topic classification in the domain of public affairs. Accepted in ICDAR 2023 Workshop on Automatic Domain-Adapted and Personalized Document Analysis.
  19. Counterfactual story reasoning and generation. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pages 5043–5053, Hong Kong, China. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  20. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(1):5485–5551.
  21. Com2sense: A commonsense reasoning benchmark with complementary sentences. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2021. In Proceedings of Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2021 (ACL-Findings). Contains 16 pages, 14 figures, and 11 tables.
  22. Conceptnet 5.5: An open multilingual graph of general knowledge. pages 4444–4451.
  23. Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805.
  24. Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288.
  25. Bidirectional encoder representations from transformers-like large language models in patient safety and pharmacovigilance: A comprehensive assessment of causal inference implications. Experimental Biology and Medicine, 248(21):1908–1917. PMID: 38084745.
  26. Large language models are better reasoners with self-verification. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023, pages 2550–2575.
  27. Yang Xu. 2021. Global divergence and local convergence of utterance semantic representations in dialogue. In Proceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics 2021, pages 116–124, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  28. Causal parrots: Large language models may talk causality but are not causal. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.13067.
  29. Understanding causality with large language models: Feasibility and opportunities.
  30. Causality analysis for evaluating the security of large language models.
  31. Through the lens of core competency: Survey on evaluation of large language models.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (9)
  1. Swagata Ashwani (1 paper)
  2. Kshiteesh Hegde (4 papers)
  3. Nishith Reddy Mannuru (7 papers)
  4. Mayank Jindal (3 papers)
  5. Dushyant Singh Sengar (1 paper)
  6. Krishna Chaitanya Rao Kathala (2 papers)
  7. Dishant Banga (1 paper)
  8. Vinija Jain (42 papers)
  9. Aman Chadha (109 papers)
Citations (9)
View on Semantic Scholar