Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 83 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 54 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 21 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 103 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 205 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 456 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 35 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Size-consistency and orbital-invariance issues revealed by VQE-UCCSD calculations with the FMO scheme (2402.17993v2)

Published 28 Feb 2024 in quant-ph and physics.chem-ph

Abstract: The fragment molecular orbital (FMO) scheme is one of the popular fragmentation-based methods and has the potential advantage of making the circuit flat in quantum chemical calculations on quantum computers. In this study, we used a GPU-accelerated quantum simulator (cuQuantum) to perform the electron correlation part of the FMO calculation as unitary coupled-cluster singles and doubles (UCCSD) with the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) for hydrogen-bonded (FH)$_3$ and (FH)$_2$-H$_2$O systems with the STO-3G basis set. VQE-UCCD calculations were performed using both canonical and localized MO sets, and the results were examined from the point of view of size-consistency and orbital-invariance affected by the Trotter error. It was found that the use of localized MO leads to better results, especially for (FH)$_2$-H$_2$O. The GPU acceleration was substantial for the simulations with larger numbers of qubits, and was about a factor of 6.7--7.7 for 18 qubit systems.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (62)
  1. Simulated quantum computation of molecular energies. Science, 309:1704–1707, 2005.
  2. Quantum chemistry in the age of quantum computing. Chem. Rev., 119:10856–10915, 2019.
  3. Quantum computational chemistry. Rev. Mod. Phys., 92:015003, 2020.
  4. Quantum algorithms for quantum chemistry and quantum materials science. Chem. Rev., 120:12685–12717, 2020.
  5. M. Motta and J. E. Rice. Emerging quantum computing algorithms for quantum chemistry. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci., 12:e1580, 2022.
  6. Evaluating the evidence for exponential quantum advantage in ground-state quantum chemistry. Nat. Comm., 14:1952, 2023.
  7. Elucidating reaction mechanisms on quantum computers. PNAS, 114:7555–7560, 2017.
  8. New perspectives on unitary coupled-cluster theory. Int. J. Quantum Chem., 106:3393–3401, 2006.
  9. A quantum computing view on unitary coupled cluster theory. Chem. Soc. Rev., 51:1659–1684, 2022.
  10. From transistor to trapped-ion computers for quantum chemistry. Sci. Rep., 4:3589, 2014.
  11. A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor. Nat. Comm., 5:4213, 2014.
  12. Strategies for quantum computing molecular energies using the unitary coupled cluster ansatz. Quantum Sci. Technol., 4:014008, 2018.
  13. Experimental quantum computational chemistry with optimised unitary coupled cluster ansatz. arXiv:2212.08006v2, 2022.
  14. Generalized unitary coupled cluster wave functions for quantum computation. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 15:311–324, 2019.
  15. A multireference quantum Krylov algorithm for strongly correlated electrons. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 16:2236–2245, 2020.
  16. G. Greene-Diniz and D. M. Ramo. Generalized unitary coupled cluster excitations for multireference molecular states optimized by the variational quantum eigensolver. Int. J. Quantum Chem., 121:e26352, 2021.
  17. Variational quantum eigensolver simulations with the multireference unitary coupled cluster ansatz: a case study of the C2⁢v2v{}_{\rm 2v}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_v end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT quasi-reaction pathway of beryllium insertion into a H22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT molecule. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 24:8439–8452, 2022.
  18. cuQuantum SDK: A high-performance library for accelerating quantum science. arXiv:2308.01999v1, 2023.
  19. Bayesian phase difference estimation algorithm for direct calculation of fine structure splitting: accelerated simulation of relativistic and quantum many-body effects. Electron. Struct., 5:035006, 2023.
  20. Quantifying the effect of gate errors on variational quantum eigensolvers for quantum chemistry. npj Quantum Info., 10:18, 2024.
  21. Fragmentation methods: A route to accurate calculations on large systems. Chem. Rev., 112:632–672, 2012.
  22. Energy-based molecular fragmentation methods. Chem. Rev., 115:5607–5642, 2015.
  23. K. Raghavachari and A. Saha. Accurate composite and fragment-based quantum chemical models for large molecules. Chem. Rev., 115:5643–5677, 2015.
  24. Towards the practical application of near-term quantum computers in quantum chemistry simulations: A problem decomposition approach. arXiv:1806.01305v1, 2018.
  25. Fragment molecular orbital method: an approximate computational method for large molecules. Chem. Phys. Lett., 313:701–706, 1999.
  26. Implementation of divide-and-conquer method including Hartree-Fock exchange interaction. J. Comput. Chem., 28:2003–2012, 2007.
  27. G. Knizia anbd G. K.-L. Chan. Density matrix embedding: A simple alternative to dynamical mean-field theory. Phys. Rev. Lett., 109:186404, 2012.
  28. Fragment molecular orbital-based variational quantum eigensolver for quantum chemistry in the age of quantum computing. Sci. Rep., 14:2422, 2024.
  29. D. Fedorov and K. Kitaura, editors. The Fragment Molecular Orbital Method: Practical Applications to Large Molecular Systems. CRC Press, Florida, 2009.
  30. Recent Advances of the Fragment Molecular Orbital Method - Enhanced Performance and Applicability. Springer, Berlin, 2021.
  31. A. Szabo and N. S. Ostlund. Modern Quantum Chemistry: Introduction to Advanced Electronic Structure Theory. Macmillan Publishing, New York, 1982.
  32. D. G. Fedorov. The fragment molecular orbital method: theoretical development, implementation in GAMESS, and applications. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci., 7:e1322, 2017.
  33. Theoretical study of the prion protein based on the fragment molecular orbital method. J. Comput. Chem., 30:2594–2601, 2009.
  34. Electron-correlated fragment-molecular-orbital calculations for biomolecular and nano systems. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 16:10310–10344, 2014.
  35. The ABINIT-MP program. In Y. Mochizuki, S. Tanaka, and K. Fukuzawa, editors, Recent Advances of the Fragment Molecular Orbital Method: Enhanced Performance and Applicability, pages 53–67. Springer, Berlin, 2021.
  36. A parallelized integral-direct second-order Møller–Plesset perturbation theory method with a fragment molecular orbital scheme. Theor. Chem. Acc., 112:442–452, 2004.
  37. Large scale MP2 calculations with fragment molecular orbital scheme. Chem. Phys. Lett., 396:473–479, 2004.
  38. Large scale FMO-MP2 calculations on a massively parallel-vector computer. Chem. Phys. Lett., 457:396–403, 2008.
  39. I. Shavitt and R. J. Bartlett. Many-Body Methods in Chemistry and Physics: MBPT and Coupled-Cluster Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009.
  40. Large-scale FMO-MP3 calculations on the surface proteins of influenza virus, hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA). Chem. Phys. Lett., 493:346–352, 2010.
  41. Higher-order correlated calculations based on fragment molecular orbital scheme. Theor. Chem. Acc., 130:515–530, 2011.
  42. Gaussian 16, Revision B.01, 2016. Gaussian Inc. Wallingford CT.
  43. A. D. Becke. A new mixing of Hartree–Fock and local density-functional theories. J. Chem. Phys., 98:1372–1377, 1993.
  44. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys., 132:154104, 2010.
  45. A complete basis set model chemistry. II. Open‐shell systems and the total energies of the first‐row atoms. J. Chem. Phys., 94:6081–6090, 1991.
  46. Self-consistent molecular-orbital methods. I. Use of Gaussian expansions of Slater-type atomic orbitals. J. Chem. Phys., 51:2657–2664, 1969.
  47. Ab initio study of the π𝜋\piitalic_π‐electron states of trans‐butadiene. J. Chem. Phys., 62:4764–4779, 1975.
  48. Quantum chemistry as a benchmark for near-term quantum computers. npj Quantum Info., 5:99, 2019.
  49. Reduction of orbital space for molecular orbital calculations with quantum computation simulator for educations. ChemRxiv.9863810.v1, 2019.
  50. The variational quantum eigensolver: A review of methods and best practices. Phys. Rep., 986:1–128, 2022.
  51. Tapering off qubits to simulate fermionic Hamiltonians. arXiv:1701.08213v1, 2017.
  52. OpenFermion: the electronic structure package for quantum computers. Quantum Sci. Technol., 5:034014, 2020.
  53. Cirq developers. Cirq (v1.2.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8161252.
  54. A comparison of the Bravyi–Kitaev and Jordan–Wigner transformations for the quantum simulation of quantum chemistry. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 14:5617–5630, 2018.
  55. M. J. D. Powell. A direct search optimization method that models the objective and constraint functions by linear interpolation. In S. Gomez and J.-P. Hennart, editors, Advances in Optimization and Numerical Analysis, pages 51–67. Springer, Dordrecht, 1994.
  56. M. J. D. Powell. An efficient method for finding the minimum of a function of several variables without calculating derivatives. Comp. J., 7:155–162, 1964.
  57. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat. Methods, 17:261–272, 2020.
  58. Application of Hilbert-space coupled-cluster theory to simple (H22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT)22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT model systems: Planar models. Phys. Rev. A, 47:2738–2782, 1993.
  59. Chemical basis of Trotter-Suzuki errors in quantum chemistry simulation. Phys. Rev. A, 91:022311, 2015.
  60. M. Möller and C. Vuik. On the impact of quantum computing technology on future developments in high-performance scientific computing. Ethics Info. Technol., 19:253–269, 2017.
  61. Quantum phase estimations of benzene and its derivatives on GPGPU quantum simulators. arXiv:2312.16375v1, 2023.
  62. Applications of noisy quantum computing and quantum error mitigation to “adamantaneland”: a benchmarking study for quantum chemistry. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 26:4071–4082, 2024.
Citations (2)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 post and received 0 likes.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up to View

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

Explore Trending Papers

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube