Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 87 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 105 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 471 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 193 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Testing The Weak Cosmic Censorship Conjecture in Short Haired Black Holes (2402.16373v1)

Published 26 Feb 2024 in gr-qc

Abstract: The Weak Cosmic Censorship Conjecture is a hypothesis regarding the properties of event horizons and singularities during the formation of black holes, stating that singularities are always encompassed by the event horizons(TEH) of black holes, thus preventing naked singularities from affecting the causal structure of spacetime. In this paper, we explore the Weak Cosmic Censorship Conjecture in the context of rotating hairy black holes, aiming to understand the impact of hairiness on the conjecture for Kerr black holes. We investigate whether TEH of rotating hairy black holes can be disrupted by incoming test particles and scalar fields. When test particles and scalar fields incident on the rotating hairy black hole are found. In extreme cases, when considering a second order approximation, if the parameter $\kappa$ (The parameter here is a function related to hair strength $\kappa(Q_m{2k})$.)falls within the range of $0<\kappa<\sqrt{1/3}$, TEH of a hairy black hole can be disrupted. Conversely, in the range of $\sqrt{1/3}<\kappa<1$, TEH of a hairy black hole cannot be disrupted. When considering the second order approximation in near extreme cases, the parameter $\kappa$, within the range of $0<\kappa<1$, can lead to the disruption of TEH in this spacetime. When an incident scalar field is present, in near extreme conditions, TEH of a rotating short hair black hole cannot be disrupted. Therefore, the value of the parameter $\kappa$ reveals the connection between rotating short hair black holes and the weak cosmic censorship conjecture, indicating that the presence of short hair significantly affects TEH of black holes. This will aid in further understanding the nature of rotating short hair black holes.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (67)
  1. John Michell. On the Means of Discovering the Distance, Magnitude, &c. of the Fixed Stars, in Consequence of the Diminution of the Velocity of Their Light, in Case Such a Diminution Should be Found to Take Place in any of Them, and Such Other Data Should be Procured from Observations, as Would be Farther Necessary for That Purpose. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond., 74:35–57, 1784.
  2. Pierre-Simon Laplace. Exposition du systéme du monde. Cambridge Library Collection - Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 2 edition, 2009.
  3. John W. Armstrong. Low-frequency gravitational wave searches using spacecraft Doppler tracking. Living Rev. Rel., 9:1, 2006.
  4. The Accelerations of stars orbiting the Milky Way’s central black hole. Nature, 407:349, 2000.
  5. Systematics of Aligned Axions. JHEP, 11:036, 2017.
  6. B. P. Abbott et al. Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116(6):061102, 2016.
  7. Roger Penrose. Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities. Phys. Rev. Lett., 14:57–59, 1965.
  8. S. W. Hawking and R. Penrose. The Singularities of gravitational collapse and cosmology. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 314:529–548, 1970.
  9. R. Penrose. Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity. Riv. Nuovo Cim., 1:252–276, 1969.
  10. Sean M. Carroll. Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity. Cambridge University Press, 2019.
  11. William E. East. Cosmic Censorship Upheld in Spheroidal Collapse of Collisionless Matter. Phys. Rev. Lett., 122(23):231103, 2019.
  12. Weak cosmic censorship with self-interacting scalar and bound on charge to mass ratio. JHEP, 03:045, 2021.
  13. R. Goswami and P. S. Joshi. Gravitational collapse of a self-interacting scalar field. Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 22:65–74, 2007.
  14. Black hole collisions, instabilities, and cosmic censorship violation at large D𝐷Ditalic_D. JHEP, 09:099, 2019.
  15. Cosmic censorship violation in black hole collisions in higher dimensions. JHEP, 04:121, 2019.
  16. Testing cosmic censorship with black hole collisions. Phys. Rev. D, 49:840–852, 1994.
  17. An Axisymmetric gravitational collapse code. Class. Quant. Grav., 20:1857–1878, 2003.
  18. Weak cosmic censorship conjecture for the (2+1)-dimensional charged BTZ black hole in the Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet Gravity. Phys. Dark Univ., 37:101082, 2022.
  19. Availability of the thermodynamics and weak cosmic censorship conjecture for a charged AdS black hole in the large dimension limit. Int. J. Theor. Phys., 60(11-12):4145–4161, 2021.
  20. Robert Wald. Gedanken experiments to destroy a black hole. Annals Phys., 82(2):548–556, 1974.
  21. Ibrahim Semiz. Dyonic Kerr-Newman black holes, complex scalar field and cosmic censorship. Gen. Rel. Grav., 43:833–846, 2011.
  22. Destroying extremal Kerr-Newman black holes with test particles. Phys. Rev. D, 87(4):044028, 2013.
  23. Cosmic Censorship of Rotating Anti-de Sitter Black Hole. JCAP, 02:015, 2016.
  24. Overcharging higher curvature black holes. Phys. Rev. D, 100(12):124019, 2019.
  25. Haryanto M. Siahaan. Destroying Kerr-Sen black holes. Phys. Rev. D, 93(6):064028, 2016.
  26. Extending the weak cosmic censorship conjecture to the charged Buchdahl star by employing the gedanken experiments. JCAP, 06:010, 2023.
  27. Shuxuan Ying. Thermodynamics and Weak Cosmic Censorship Conjecture of 4D Gauss-Bonnet-Maxwell Black Holes via Charged Particle Absorption. Chin. Phys. C, 44(12):125101, 2020.
  28. Gedanken experiments on nearly extremal black holes and the Third Law. Phys. Rev. D, 82:104015, 2010.
  29. F. de Felice and Yun-Qiang Yu. Turning a black hole into a naked singularity. Class. Quant. Grav., 18:1235–1244, 2001.
  30. Violations of the weak cosmic censorship conjecture in the higher dimensional f⁢(R)𝑓𝑅f(R)italic_f ( italic_R ) black holes with pressure. Eur. Phys. J. C, 80(3):209, 2020.
  31. Deyou Chen. Thermodynamics and weak cosmic censorship conjecture in extended phase spaces of anti-de Sitter black holes with particles’ absorption. Eur. Phys. J. C, 79(4):353, 2019.
  32. George E. A. Matsas and Andre R. R. da Silva. Overspinning a nearly extreme charged black hole via a quantum tunneling process. Phys. Rev. Lett., 99:181301, 2007.
  33. Overspinning a nearly extreme black hole and the Weak Cosmic Censorship conjecture. Phys. Rev. D, 78:081503, 2008.
  34. Flowing along the edge: spinning up black holes in AdS spacetimes with test particles. Phys. Rev. D, 89(6):064065, 2014.
  35. Koray Düztaş. Overspinning BTZ black holes with test particles and fields. Phys. Rev. D, 94(12):124031, 2016.
  36. Bogeun Gwak. Thermodynamics with Pressure and Volume under Charged Particle Absorption. JHEP, 11:129, 2017.
  37. Exploring the Impact of Coupled Behavior on the Weak Cosmic Censorship Conjecture in Cold Dark Matter-Black Hole Systems. 1 2024.
  38. The Weak Cosmic Censorship Conjecture in Hairy Kerr Black Holes. 1 2024.
  39. Test the weak cosmic censorship conjecture via cold dark matter-black hole and ultralight dark matter-black hole. 11 2023.
  40. Test the weak cosmic supervision conjecture in dark matter-black hole system. Eur. Phys. J. C, 83(10):986, 2023.
  41. Destroying the event horizon of a rotating black-bounce black hole. Eur. Phys. J. C, 83(10):938, 2023.
  42. Werner Israel. Event horizons in static vacuum space-times. Phys. Rev., 164:1776–1779, 1967.
  43. Werner Israel. Event horizons in static electrovac space-times. Commun. Math. Phys., 8:245–260, 1968.
  44. B. Carter. Axisymmetric Black Hole Has Only Two Degrees of Freedom. Phys. Rev. Lett., 26:331–333, 1971.
  45. S. W. Hawking. Black holes in general relativity. Commun. Math. Phys., 25:152–166, 1972.
  46. D. C. Robinson. Uniqueness of the Kerr black hole. Phys. Rev. Lett., 34:905–906, 1975.
  47. P. O. Mazur. PROOF OF UNIQUENESS OF THE KERR-NEWMAN BLACK HOLE SOLUTION. J. Phys. A, 15:3173–3180, 1982.
  48. J. D. Bekenstein. Novel “no-scalar-hair” theorem for black holes. Phys. Rev. D, 51(12):R6608, 1995.
  49. Testing the No-Hair Theorem with Event Horizon Telescope Observations of Sagittarius A*. Astrophys. J., 784:7, 2014.
  50. Testing the no-hair theorem with GW150914. Phys. Rev. Lett., 123(11):111102, 2019.
  51. Ke Wang. Retesting the no-hair theorem with GW150914. Eur. Phys. J. C, 82(2):125, 2022.
  52. Norman Gürlebeck. No-hair theorem for Black Holes in Astrophysical Environments. Phys. Rev. Lett., 114(15):151102, 2015.
  53. Carlos A. R. Herdeiro and Eugen Radu. Asymptotically flat black holes with scalar hair: a review. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 24(09):1542014, 2015.
  54. The no-hair theorem and black hole shadows. JHEP, 12:125, 2022.
  55. Soft Hair on Black Holes. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116(23):231301, 2016.
  56. Carlos A. R. Herdeiro and Eugen Radu. Kerr black holes with scalar hair. Phys. Rev. Lett., 112:221101, 2014.
  57. Construction and physical properties of Kerr black holes with scalar hair. Class. Quant. Grav., 32(14):144001, 2015.
  58. Black Hole’s 1/N Hair. Phys. Lett. B, 719:419–423, 2013.
  59. Quantum hair on black holes. Nucl. Phys. B, 378:175–246, 1992.
  60. Growing hair on black holes. Phys. Rev. Lett., 67:1975–1978, Oct 1991.
  61. Soft Hair as a Soft Wig. Class. Quant. Grav., 34(20):204001, 2017.
  62. Gravitational decoupling for axially symmetric systems and rotating black holes. Phys. Rev. D, 103(4):044020, 2021.
  63. Hairy black holes by gravitational decoupling. Phys. Dark Univ., 31:100744, 2021.
  64. Note on the Kerr spinning particle metric. J. Math. Phys., 6:915–917, 1965.
  65. Mustapha Azreg-Aïnou. Generating rotating regular black hole solutions without complexification. Phys. Rev. D, 90(6):064041, 2014.
  66. Mustapha Azreg-Ainou. Regular and conformal regular cores for static and rotating solutions. Phys. Lett. B, 730:95–98, 2014.
  67. Superradiance: New Frontiers in Black Hole Physics. Lect. Notes Phys., 906:pp.1–237, 2015.
Citations (5)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com