Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
125 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

An Avalanche of Images on Telegram Preceded Russia's Full-Scale Invasion of Ukraine (2402.14947v2)

Published 22 Feb 2024 in cs.HC, cs.MM, and cs.SI

Abstract: Governments use propaganda, including through visual content -- or Politically Salient Image Patterns (PSIP) -- on social media, to influence and manipulate public opinion. In the present work, we collected Telegram post-history of from 989 Russian milbloggers to better understand the social and political narratives that circulated online in the months surrounding Russia's 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Overall, we found an 8,925% increase (p<0.001) in the number of posts and a 5,352% increase (p<0.001) in the number of images posted by these accounts in the two weeks prior to the invasion. We also observed a similar increase in the number and intensity of politically salient manipulated images that circulated on Telegram. Although this paper does not evaluate malice or coordination in these activities, we do conclude with a call for further research into the role that manipulated visual media has in the lead-up to instability events and armed conflict.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (48)
  1. Daniel Allington. Conspiracy theories, radicalisation and digital media. London: Kings College London.[Google Scholar], 2020.
  2. Gregory Asmolov. The disconnective power of disinformation campaigns. Journal of International Affairs, 71(1.5):69–76, 2018.
  3. Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press, 2018.
  4. Kenneth J Boyte. An analysis of the social-media technology, tactics, and narratives used to control perception in the propaganda war over ukraine. Journal of Information Warfare, 16(1):88–111, 2017.
  5. Sara Brown. In russia–ukraine war, social media stokes ingenuity, disinformation. Retrieved May, 9:2022, 2022.
  6. Daniel Dale. Fact check: How a false story about leonardo dicaprio donating $10 million to ukraine spread around the world. CNN, 2022.
  7. Visual mis-and disinformation, social media, and democracy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 98(3):641–664, 2021.
  8. Understanding conspiracy theories. Political psychology, 40:3–35, 2019.
  9. The empire strikes back: War without war and occupation without occupation in the russian sphere of influence. American ethnologist, 41(3):405–413, 2014.
  10. The Economist. Battle of the memes. 2015.
  11. Rose Eveleth. How many photographs of you are out there in the world? The Atlantic, 2, 2015.
  12. Max Fisher. Ukraine’s parliament just threw president yanukovych under the bus. that’s great news. Washington Post, 2014.
  13. Mark Galeotti. Hybrid, ambiguous, and non-linear? how new is russias new way of war? Small wars & insurgencies, 27(2):282–301, 2016.
  14. Jim Garamone. Biden: ‘ukraine will never be a victory for russia. never. US Department of Defense News, 2023.
  15. A global model for forecasting political instability. American journal of political science, 54(1):190–208, 2010.
  16. Lester W Grau. Brothers armed: Military aspects of the crisis in ukraine, by howard, colby, and pukhov, ruslan (eds.) minneapolis: East view press, 2014. isbn: 978-1-8799-4422-0, 2015.
  17. Information literacy vs. fake news: the case of ukraine. Open Information Science, 3(1):154–165, 2019.
  18. Barbara Harff. No lessons learned from the holocaust? assessing risks of genocide and political mass murder since 1955. In Genocide and Human Rights, pages 329–345. Routledge, 2017.
  19. Searching for mobilenetv3. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 1314–1324, 2019.
  20. Billion-scale similarity search with gpus. IEEE Transactions on Big Data, 7(3):535–547, 2019.
  21. How social media facilitates political protest: Information, motivation, and social networks. Political psychology, 39:85–118, 2018.
  22. Fast, automatic and fine-grained tampered jpeg image detection via dct coefficient analysis. Pattern Recognition, 42(11):2492–2501, 2009.
  23. N MacFarquahar. After the faked journalist killing in ukraine, the murk deepens. The New York Times, 2018.
  24. N MacFarquahar. ifunny has become a hub for white nationalism. BuzzFeed News, 2019.
  25. Ukraine’s Euromaidan: Analyses of a Civil Revolution, volume 138. Columbia University Press, 2014.
  26. Ukraine: Witness to revolution. Kyiv Post, 2016.
  27. An Xiao Mina. Memes to movements: How the world’s most viral media is changing social protest and power. Beacon Press, 2019.
  28. Cristina Moreno-Almeida. Memes as snapshots of participation: The role of digital amateur activists in authoritarian regimes. New Media & Society, 23(6):1545–1566, 2021.
  29. D Patterson. From deepfake to “cheap fake,” it’s getting harder to tell what’s true on your favorite apps and websites. CBN News. Retrieved May, 17:2023, 2019.
  30. Victoire Rio. Myanmar: The role of social media in fomenting violence. In Social Media Impacts on Conflict and Democracy, pages 143–160. Routledge, 2021.
  31. Matthew Rosenberg. A qanon supporter is headed to congress. The New York Times, 2020.
  32. Normalized cuts and image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 22(8):888–905, 2000.
  33. Limor Shifman. Memes in digital culture. MIT press, 2013.
  34. Marci Shore. The Ukrainian night: An intimate history of revolution. Yale University Press, 2018.
  35. Zachary C Steinert-Threlkeld. Spontaneous collective action: Peripheral mobilization during the arab spring. American Political Science Review, 111(2):379–403, 2017.
  36. Violence erupts in indonesia’s capital in wake of presidential election result. The New York Times, 2019.
  37. Automatic discovery of political meme genres with diverse appearances. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, volume 15, pages 714–726, 2021.
  38. Motif mining: Finding and summarizing remixed image content. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pages 1319–1328, 2023.
  39. On the effectiveness of image manipulation detection in the age of social media. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.09414, 2023.
  40. Destination engagement on facebook: Time and seasonality. Annals of Tourism Research, 79:102747, 2019.
  41. Visual disinformation in a digital age: A literature synthesis and research agenda. new media & society, 25(12):3696–3713, 2023.
  42. Samuel Woolley. The reality game: how the next wave of technology will break the truth. Hachette UK, 2020.
  43. Visual misinformation on facebook. Journal of Communication, page jqac051, 2023.
  44. An ai early warning system to monitor online disinformation, stop violence, and protect elections. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 76(2):85–90, 2020.
  45. Meme warfare: Ai countermeasures to disinformation should focus on popular, not perfect, fakes. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 77(3):119–123, 2021.
  46. Serhy Yekelchyk. The Conflict in Ukraine: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University Press, 2015.
  47. Thomas Zeitzoff. Using social media to measure conflict dynamics: An application to the 2008–2009 gaza conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 55(6):938–969, 2011.
  48. Thomas Zeitzoff. How social media is changing conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61(9):1970–1991, 2017.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now