Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Unveiling the Magic: Investigating Attention Distillation in Retrieval-augmented Generation (2402.11794v1)

Published 19 Feb 2024 in cs.CL and cs.IR

Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation framework can address the limitations of LLMs by enabling real-time knowledge updates for more accurate answers. An efficient way in the training phase of retrieval-augmented models is attention distillation, which uses attention scores as a supervision signal instead of manually annotated query-document pairs. Despite its growing popularity, the detailed mechanisms behind the success of attention distillation remain unexplored, particularly the specific patterns it leverages to benefit training. In this paper, we address this gap by conducting a comprehensive review of attention distillation workflow and identifying key factors influencing the learning quality of retrieval-augmented LLMs. We further propose indicators for optimizing models' training methods and avoiding ineffective training.

PDF HTML Abstract

Investigating Attention Distillation in Retrieval-augmented Generation Models

Introduction

Recent advancements in LLMs have significantly propelled the field of NLP. Despite their successes, LLMs are hindered by their inability to update knowledge in real-time and safeguard sensitive training data. Retrieval-augmented LLMs emerge as a promising solution, combining retriever and reader components to dynamically incorporate external knowledge, enhancing model accuracy while potentially reducing training complexities. An intriguing strategy within this domain is attention distillation, a process that distills attention scores from the reader to guide the retriever in identifying key information assets. This paper explores the intricacies of attention distillation, exploring its operational mechanisms and presenting indicators for optimizing training efficiency.

Methodological Overview

The paper adopts the ATLAS architecture, utilizing a decoder-only LLM configuration focusing on QA tasks to scrutinize the attention score distillation mechanisms. Attention scores are employed as indicators of document relevance, steering away from the more traditional cross-attention scores. The uniqueness of this paper lies in its evaluation of both the self-attention scores and the value vector norms to comprehensively understand their combined effect on distilling knowledge into the retriever component.

Experimental Insights

The experimental setup spans Falcon-1b as the reader and Contriver as the retriever, examining performance across varied training configurations using the NaturalQuestions and TriviaQA benchmarks. A pivotal finding is the dichotomy in performance between off-the-shelf and fine-tuned distillation training, with the latter significantly outperforming the former. This discrepancy alludes to the critical role of reader model quality in attention distillation efficacy. Furthermore, the research navigates through token-level quantitative analyses, uncovering notable patterns in attention distribution that align with optimal supervisory signals from high-quality readers. Such insights pave the way for introducing two key indicators of attention distillation quality, hinged on the attention allocation to answer-related and question-related tokens.

Implications and Future Directions

This paper elucidates the complex dynamics of attention distillation within retrieval-augmented LLMs, providing a nuanced understanding that can refine the retriever-reader interplay. Practically, the indicators proposed offer a methodical approach to enhancing training methodologies, potentially steering future research toward more nuanced, attention-based knowledge distillation techniques. Theoretically, these findings contribute significantly to the broader discourse on improving the efficiency and effectiveness of retrieval-augmented models. However, recognising the limitation of focusing on decoder-only models, the paper underscores the necessity of extending this exploration to encompass larger-scale models, aiming to affirm the generalizability of its findings across varying model architectures.

Conclusion

Through a detailed examination of attention distillation in retrieval-augmented generation, this paper highlights the paramount influence of attention scores derived from high-quality reader models in enhancing retriever performance. By proposing novel metrics for evaluating the attention distillation quality, the research not only addresses the imperative need for efficient training strategies but also lays the groundwork for future investigations aimed at refining the symbiosis between retrieval and generation components in LLMs.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown Bookmark Chat Bubble Oval Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Chat (Pro)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (31)
  1. Can retriever-augmented language models reason? the blame game between the retriever and the language model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.09146.
  2. Retrieval augmented language model pre-training. In International conference on machine learning, pages 3929–3938. PMLR.
  3. Efficiently teaching an effective dense retriever with balanced topic aware sampling. In Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 113–122.
  4. A survey of knowledge enhanced pre-trained language models. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.
  5. Unsupervised dense information retrieval with contrastive learning.
  6. Gautier Izacard and Edouard Grave. 2020a. Distilling knowledge from reader to retriever for question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.04584.
  7. Gautier Izacard and Edouard Grave. 2020b. Leveraging passage retrieval with generative models for open domain question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.01282.
  8. Few-shot learning with retrieval augmented language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.03299.
  9. Active retrieval augmented generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.06983.
  10. TriviaQA: A large scale distantly supervised challenge dataset for reading comprehension. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 1601–1611, Vancouver, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  11. Large language models struggle to learn long-tail knowledge. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 15696–15707. PMLR.
  12. Dense passage retrieval for open-domain question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.04906.
  13. Generalization through memorization: Nearest neighbor language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.00172.
  14. Natural questions: A benchmark for question answering research. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 7:452–466.
  15. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:9459–9474.
  16. Truthfulqa: Measuring how models mimic human falsehoods. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.07958.
  17. Recent advances in natural language processing via large pre-trained language models: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 56(2):1–40.
  18. Scalable extraction of training data from (production) language models.
  19. OpenAI. 2023. Gpt-4 technical report.
  20. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:27730–27744.
  21. The RefinedWeb dataset for Falcon LLM: outperforming curated corpora with web data, and web data only. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.01116.
  22. In-context retrieval-augmented language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.00083.
  23. knn-prompt: Nearest neighbor zero-shot inference, 2022b. URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2205.13792.
  24. Replug: Retrieval-augmented black-box language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.12652.
  25. Retrieval augmentation reduces hallucination in conversation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.07567.
  26. A survey on large language model based autonomous agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.11432.
  27. Generate rather than retrieve: Large language models are strong context generators. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.10063.
  28. Extractive summarization via ChatGPT for faithful summary generation. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023, pages 3270–3278, Singapore. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  29. SummIt: Iterative text summarization via ChatGPT. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023, pages 10644–10657, Singapore. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  30. Improving the faithfulness of abstractive summarization via entity coverage control. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2022, pages 528–535, Seattle, United States. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  31. How language model hallucinations can snowball. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13534.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Zizhong Li (9 papers)
  2. Haopeng Zhang (32 papers)
  3. Jiawei Zhang (529 papers)
Citations (2)
View on Semantic Scholar
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets