Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 47 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 37 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 11 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 101 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 195 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 465 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 30 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

A scaling limit of $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ lattice Yang-Mills-Higgs theory (2401.10507v2)

Published 19 Jan 2024 in math.PR, hep-th, math-ph, and math.MP

Abstract: The construction of non-Abelian Euclidean Yang-Mills theories in dimension four, as scaling limits of lattice Yang-Mills theories or otherwise, is a central open question of mathematical physics. This paper takes the following small step towards this goal. In any dimension $d\ge 2$, we construct a scaling limit of $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ lattice Yang-Mills theory coupled to a Higgs field transforming in the fundamental representation of $\mathrm{SU}(2)$. After unitary gauge fixing and taking the lattice spacing $\varepsilon\to 0$, and simultaneously taking the gauge coupling constant $g\to 0$ and the Higgs length $\alpha\to \infty$ in such a manner that $\alpha g$ is always equal to $c\varepsilon$ for some fixed $c$ and $g= O(\varepsilon{50d})$, a stereographic projection of the gauge field is shown to converge to a scale-invariant massive Gaussian field. This gives the first construction of a scaling limit of a non-Abelian lattice Yang-Mills theory in a dimension higher than two, as well as the first rigorous proof of mass generation by the Higgs mechanism in such a theory. Analogous results are proved for $\mathrm{U}(1)$ theory as well. The question of constructing a non-Gaussian scaling limit remains open.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (38)
  1. T. Balaban. ((((Higgs)2,3)_{2,3}) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT quantum fields in a finite volume. I. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 85(4):603–626, 1982a.
  2. T. Balaban. ((((Higgs)2,3)_{2,3}) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT quantum fields in a finite volume. II. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 86(4):555–594, 1982b.
  3. T. Balaban. ((((Higgs)2,3)_{2,3}) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT quantum fields in a finite volume. III. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 88(3):411–445, 1983a.
  4. T. Balaban. Regularity and decay of lattice Green’s functions. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 89(4):571–597, 1983b.
  5. T. Balaban. Ultraviolet stability of three-dimensional lattice pure gauge field theories. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 102(2):255–275, 1985.
  6. T. Balaban. Large field renormalization. II. Localization, exponentiation, and bounds for the R operation. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 122(3):355–392, 1989.
  7. The mass gap for Higgs models on a unit lattice. Annals of Physics, 158(2):281–319, 1984.
  8. T. Banks and E. Rabinovici. Finite Temperature Behavior of the Lattice Abelian Higgs Model. Nuclear Physics B, 160:349–379, 1979.
  9. C. Borgs and F. Nill. The phase diagram of the Abelian lattice Higgs model. A review of rigorous results. Journal of Statistical Physics, 47:877–904, 1987.
  10. On the construction of quantized gauge fields. I. General results. Annals of Physics, 121(1-2):227–284, 1979.
  11. S. Cao and S. Chatterjee. A state space for 3D Euclidean Yang-Mills theories. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.12813, 2021.
  12. S. Cao and S. Chatterjee. The Yang-Mills heat flow with random distributional initial data. Communications in Partial Differential Equations, 48(2):209–251, 2023.
  13. Langevin dynamic for the 2D Yang–Mills measure. Publications Mathématiques de l’IHÉS, 136(1):1–147, 2022a.
  14. Stochastic quantisation of Yang-Mills-Higgs in 3D. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.03487, 2022b.
  15. I. Chevyrev. Yang–Mills measure on the two-dimensional torus as a random distribution. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 372(3):1027–1058, 2019.
  16. I. Chevyrev. Stochastic quantization of Yang–Mills. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 63(9), 2022.
  17. J. Dimock. Ultraviolet regularity for QED in d=3𝑑3d=3italic_d = 3. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 59(1), 2018.
  18. J. Dimock. Multiscale block averaging for QED in d=3𝑑3d=3italic_d = 3. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 61(3), 2020.
  19. B. K. Driver. Convergence of the U⁢(1)4𝑈subscript14U(1)_{4}italic_U ( 1 ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT lattice gauge theory to its continuum limit. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 110(3):479–501, 1987.
  20. B. K. Driver. YM2subscriptYM2\mathrm{YM}_{2}roman_YM start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT: Continuum expectations, lattice convergence, and lassos. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 123:575–616, 1989.
  21. D. S. Fine. Quantum Yang–Mills on a Riemann surface. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 140:321–338, 1991.
  22. E. Fradkin and S. H. Shenker. Phase diagrams of lattice gauge theories with Higgs fields. Physical Review D, 19(12):3682, 1979.
  23. J. Ginibre and G. Velo. The free Euclidean massive vector field in the Stückelberg gauge. Annales de l’IHP Physique Théorique, 22(3):257–264, 1975.
  24. J. Glimm and A. Jaffe. Quantum Physics: A Functional Integral Point Of View. Springer-Verlag, New York, second edition, 1987.
  25. A convergent expansion about mean field theory: I. The expansion. Annals of Physics, 101(2):610–630, 1976.
  26. L. Gross. The free Euclidean Proca and electromagnetic fields. In Report to the Cumberland Lodge Conference on Functional Integration and its Applications, 1974.
  27. L. Gross. Convergence of U⁢(1)3𝑈subscript13U(1)_{3}italic_U ( 1 ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT lattice gauge theory to its continuum limit. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 92(2):137–162, 1983.
  28. L. Gross. The Yang-Mills heat equation with finite action in three dimensions. Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society. American Mathematical Society, 2022.
  29. Two dimensional Yang-Mills theory via stochastic differential equations. Annals of Physics, 194(1):65–112, 1989.
  30. A. Jaffe and E. Witten. Quantum Yang–Mills theory. In The millennium prize problems, pages 129–152. Clay Mathematics Institute, Cambridge, MA., 2006.
  31. T. Kennedy and C. King. Spontaneous symmetry breakdown in the abelian Higgs model. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 104(2):327–347, 1986.
  32. T. Lévy. Yang–Mills measure on compact surfaces. Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society. American Mathematical Soc., 2003.
  33. Construction of YM4subscriptYM4\mathrm{YM}_{4}roman_YM start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with an infrared cutoff. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 155:325–383, 1993.
  34. K. Osterwalder and E. Seiler. Gauge field theories on a lattice. Annals of Physics, 110(2):440–471, 1978.
  35. E. Seiler. Gauge Theories as a Problem of Constructive Quantum Field Theory and Statistical Mechanics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1982.
  36. A. Sengupta. Gauge theory on compact surfaces. Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society. American Mathematical Soc., 1997.
  37. H. Shen. Stochastic quantization of an Abelian gauge theory. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 384(3):1445–1512, 2021.
  38. E. C. G. Stückelberg. Interaction energy in electrodynamics and in the field theory of nuclear forces. Helv. Phys. Acta, 11(3):225, 1938.
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)