Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Cross-Attention Watermarking of Large Language Models (2401.06829v1)

Published 12 Jan 2024 in cs.CL and cs.AI

Abstract: A new approach to linguistic watermarking of LLMs is presented in which information is imperceptibly inserted into the output text while preserving its readability and original meaning. A cross-attention mechanism is used to embed watermarks in the text during inference. Two methods using cross-attention are presented that minimize the effect of watermarking on the performance of a pretrained model. Exploration of different training strategies for optimizing the watermarking and of the challenges and implications of applying this approach in real-world scenarios clarified the tradeoff between watermark robustness and text quality. Watermark selection substantially affects the generated output for high entropy sentences. This proactive watermarking approach has potential application in future model development.

PDF HTML Abstract

Exploring the Frontiers of Linguistic Watermarking in LLMs

Introduction to Linguistic Watermarking in LLMs

In the field of NLP, the paper introduces an innovative strategy centered on the notion of linguistic watermarking within LLMs. This approach entails the imperceptible embedding of specific information into the output text during inference, ensuring the preservation of the original text's readability and meaning. The utilization of a cross-attention mechanism plays a pivotal role in this process, facilitating the embedding of watermarks directly into the text. This method represents a significant step forward in addressing the challenges associated with watermark robustness and text quality, offering a promising avenue for securing and attributing authorship to machine-generated content.

The Challenge at Hand

The drive towards developing effective watermarking techniques stems from the need to discern machine-generated texts in light of their increasingly indistinguishable quality from human-produced content. As LLMs become more prevalent and accessible, the risk of their exploitation across various sectors intensifies, necessitating robust solutions for the accountability and traceability of AI-generated text. Traditional watermarking methods have struggled to balance the imperceptibility of the watermark with the integrity of the original text, often at the cost of diminishing the text's quality or the watermark's effectiveness.

Contributions and Methodologies

The paper delineates several noteworthy contributions to the field of text watermarking using LLMs:

  • Watermarking Layer with Cross-Attention: By incorporating a watermarking layer that leverages a cross-attention mechanism, the authors propose a streamlined method to integrate watermarks into the LLM's output without significantly increasing the model's parameter count. This methodology promises a minimal impact on the LLM's performance while ensuring the robustness of the embedded watermark.
  • Explainable Framework for Watermark Verification: The establishment of a framework for the verification of watermarks post-generation enriches this research with a practical tool for real-world applications. By clearly outlining the challenges associated with watermark integration and verification, the paper presents a well-considered approach to realizing watermarking in practice.
  • Optimization of Training Strategies: The development of specialized training strategies aimed at reinforcing the watermarks' resilience and the model's output quality underlines the meticulous research efforts. These strategies are designed to navigate the trade-offs inherent to watermark robustness and text quality, marking a critical contribution to the watermarking discourse.

Technical Insights and Implications

On the technical front, the paper's exploration of models, particularly those utilizing the cross-attention mechanism, illuminates the potential for efficient and effective watermark embedding. The use of such mechanisms, drawing inspiration from the integration of multimodal models, highlights an inventive application of existing technologies in novel contexts. Additionally, the proposal of augmentative techniques—specifically noise addition and paraphrasing—undoubtedly advances the robustness of the watermarked texts against adversarial attacks.

The practical implications of this research are multi-faceted. Not only does it pave the way for more secure and accountable use of LLMs in generating content, but it also has the potential to influence future regulations surrounding AI-generated texts. Importantly, this work proposes a paradigm where watermark integration does not impose heavy computational costs or necessitate substantial model alterations, advocating for a balance between operability and security.

Looking Forward

The paper sets a solid foundation for future exploration in linguistic watermarking within the rapidly evolving domain of LLMs. It propels the conversation beyond mere detection of AI-generated content to encompass secure, effective, and integrated solutions for watermarking. As the technology progresses, the intersection of AI-generated text authenticity and imperceptible watermarking will undoubtedly remain a critical area of research. The continued development of methods that adeptly balance the interplay between watermark robustness and text quality will be paramount in harnessing the full potential of LLMs in a responsible and ethical manner.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown Bookmark Chat Bubble Oval Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Chat (Pro)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (29)
  1. “A review of text watermarking: Theory, methods, and applications,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 8011–8028, 2018.
  2. “Generative language models and automated influence operations: Emerging threats and potential mitigations,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.04246, 2023.
  3. “Machine generated text: A comprehensive survey of threat models and detection methods,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.07321, 2022.
  4. “Chatgpt and the ai act,” Internet Policy Review, vol. 12, no. 1, 2023.
  5. “The curse of recursion: Training on generated data makes models forget,” arXiv preprint arxiv:2305.17493, 2023.
  6. “Can ai-generated text be reliably detected?,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.11156, 2023.
  7. “Deepfake text detection: Limitations and opportunities,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.09421, 2022.
  8. “Undetectable watermarks for language models,” Cryptology ePrint Archive, Paper 2023/763, 2023.
  9. “Natural language watermarking: Design, analysis, and a proof-of-concept implementation,” in International Workshop on Information Hiding. Springer, 2001, pp. 185–200.
  10. “Natural language watermarking and tamperproofing,” in International Workshop on Information Hiding. Springer, 2002, pp. 196–212.
  11. “The hiding virtues of ambiguity: quantifiably resilient watermarking of natural language text through synonym substitutions,” in Proceedings of the 8th workshop on Multimedia and security, 2006, pp. 164–174.
  12. “Reversible natural language watermarking using synonym substitution and arithmetic coding.,” Computers, Materials & Continua, vol. 55, no. 3, 2018.
  13. “Generating steganographic text with lstms,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.10742, 2017.
  14. “Tracing text provenance via context-aware lexical substitution,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2022, vol. 36, pp. 11613–11621.
  15. “Natural language watermarking via paraphraser-based lexical substitution,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 317, pp. 103859, 2023.
  16. “Sentence-bert: Sentence embeddings using siamese bert-networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.10084, 2019.
  17. “Deeptextmark: Deep learning based text watermarking for detection of large language model generated text,” 2023.
  18. “Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781, 2013.
  19. “Robust natural language watermarking through invariant features,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.01904, 2023.
  20. “Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805, 2018.
  21. “Adversarial watermarking transformer: Towards tracing text provenance with data hiding,” 2021.
  22. “Sentencepiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for neural text processing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.06226, 2018.
  23. “A watermark for large language models,” 2023.
  24. “Flamingo: a visual language model for few-shot learning,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 23716–23736, 2022.
  25. “Visualgpt: Data-efficient adaptation of pretrained language models for image captioning,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022, pp. 18030–18040.
  26. “Attention is all you need,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 30, 2017.
  27. “Openwebtext corpus,” 2019.
  28. “Categorical reparameterization with gumbel-softmax,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.01144, 2016.
  29. “LoRA: Low-rank adaptation of large language models,” in International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Folco Bertini Baldassini (2 papers)
  2. Huy H. Nguyen (36 papers)
  3. Ching-Chung Chang (1 paper)
  4. Isao Echizen (83 papers)
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar