Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
125 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

TripleSurv: Triplet Time-adaptive Coordinate Loss for Survival Analysis (2401.02708v1)

Published 5 Jan 2024 in cs.LG, cs.AI, and stat.ML

Abstract: A core challenge in survival analysis is to model the distribution of censored time-to-event data, where the event of interest may be a death, failure, or occurrence of a specific event. Previous studies have showed that ranking and maximum likelihood estimation (MLE)loss functions are widely-used for survival analysis. However, ranking loss only focus on the ranking of survival time and does not consider potential effect of samples for exact survival time values. Furthermore, the MLE is unbounded and easily subject to outliers (e.g., censored data), which may cause poor performance of modeling. To handle the complexities of learning process and exploit valuable survival time values, we propose a time-adaptive coordinate loss function, TripleSurv, to achieve adaptive adjustments by introducing the differences in the survival time between sample pairs into the ranking, which can encourage the model to quantitatively rank relative risk of pairs, ultimately enhancing the accuracy of predictions. Most importantly, the TripleSurv is proficient in quantifying the relative risk between samples by ranking ordering of pairs, and consider the time interval as a trade-off to calibrate the robustness of model over sample distribution. Our TripleSurv is evaluated on three real-world survival datasets and a public synthetic dataset. The results show that our method outperforms the state-of-the-art methods and exhibits good model performance and robustness on modeling various sophisticated data distributions with different censor rates. Our code will be available upon acceptance.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (25)
  1. Countdown Regression: Sharp and Calibrated Survival Predictions.
  2. Improving palliative care with deep learning. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 18(4): 55–64.
  3. Deep-learning cardiac motion analysis for human survival prediction. Nature machine intelligence, 1(2): 95.
  4. Cox, D. R. 1972. Regression models and life‐tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 34(2): 187–202.
  5. Cox, D. R. 1975. Partial likelihood. Biometrika, 62(2): 269–276.
  6. Probabilistic forecasting. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 1: 125–151.
  7. X-CAL: Explicit calibration for survival analysis. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33: 18296–18307.
  8. Assessment and comparison of prognostic classification schemes for survival data. Statistics in medicine, 18(17‐18): 2529–2545.
  9. Evaluating the yield of medical tests. Jama, 247(18): 2543–2546.
  10. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 770–778.
  11. A deep survival analysis method based on ranking. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 98: 1–9.
  12. Time-dependent ROC curve analysis in medical research: current methods and applications. BMC medical research methodology, 17(1): 1–19.
  13. Estimating Calibrated Individualized Survival Curves with Deep Learning. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 35, 240–248. ISBN 2374-3468.
  14. DeepSurv: personalized treatment recommender system using a Cox proportional hazards deep neural network. BMC medical research methodology, 18(1): 24.
  15. Deephit: A deep learning approach to survival analysis with competing risks. In Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 32. ISBN 2374-3468.
  16. A Multi-Task Learning Formulation for Survival Analysis. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, 1715–1724. ACM.
  17. Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records. NPJ digital medicine, 1(1): 1–10.
  18. Deep survival analysis. In Machine Learning for Healthcare Conference, 101–114. PMLR.
  19. On Ranking in Survival Analysis: Bounds on the Concordance Index. In Conference on Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
  20. Deep recurrent survival analysis. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 33, 4798–4805. ISBN 2374-3468.
  21. Big data and predictive analytics: recalibrating expectations. Jama, 320(1): 27–28.
  22. On ranking in survival analysis: Bounds on the concordance index. Advances in neural information processing systems, 20.
  23. Tibshirani, R. 1997. The lasso method for variable selection in the Cox model. Statistics in medicine, 16(4): 385–395.
  24. Calibration of risk prediction models: impact on decision-analytic performance. Medical decision making, 35(2): 162–169.
  25. Combining Ranking and Point-wise Losses for Training Deep Survival Analysis Models. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), 689–698. IEEE. ISBN 1665423986.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.