Data-driven Energy Efficiency Modelling in Large-scale Networks: An Expert Knowledge and ML-based Approach (2401.00443v2)
Abstract: The energy consumption of mobile networks poses a critical challenge. Mitigating this concern necessitates the deployment and optimization of network energy-saving solutions, such as carrier shutdown, to dynamically manage network resources. Traditional optimization approaches encounter complexity due to factors like the large number of cells, stochastic traffic, channel variations, and intricate trade-offs. This paper introduces the simulated reality of communication networks (SRCON) framework, a novel, data-driven modeling paradigm that harnesses live network data and employs a blend of ML- and expert-based models. These mix of models accurately characterizes the functioning of network components, and predicts network energy efficiency and user equipment (UE) quality of service for any energy carrier shutdown configuration in a specific network. Distinguishing itself from existing methods, SRCON eliminates the reliance on expensive expert knowledge, drive testing, or incomplete maps for predicting network performance. This paper details the pipeline employed by SRCON to decompose the large network energy efficiency modeling problem into ML and expert-based submodels. It demonstrates how, by embracing stochasticity, and carefully crafting the relationship between such submodels, the overall computational complexity can be reduced and prediction accuracy enhanced. Results derived from real network data underscore the paradigm shift introduced by SRCON, showcasing significant gains over a state-of-the art method used by a operator for network energy efficiency modeling. The reliability of this local, data-driven modeling of the network proves to be a key asset for network energy-saving optimization.
- Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., “Green 5G: Building a Sustainable World,” Tech. Rep., Aug. 2020.
- D. López–Pérez, A. De Domenico, N. Piovesan, G. Xinli, H. Bao, S. Qitao, and M. Debbah, “A Survey on 5G Radio Access Network Energy Efficiency: Massive MIMO, Lean Carrier Design, Sleep Modes, and Machine Learning,” IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 653–697, 2022.
- ITU-R, “M.2083-0, IMT Vision—Framework and Overall Objectives of the Future Development of IMT for 2020 and Beyond,” Sep. 2015.
- GSMA, “5G Energy efficiencies: Green is the new black,” Tech. Rep., Nov. 2020, Accessed on 19/08/2022.
- ——, “Mobile Net Zero: State of the Industry on Climate Action 2022,” Tech. Rep., May 2022, Accessed on 19/08/2022.
- NGMN, “Network energy efficiency (Phase 2),” Tech. Rep., Feb. 2023, Accessed on 01/03/2022.
- 3GPP TSG RAN, “TS 32.450, Telecommunication management; Key Performance Indicators (KPI) for Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN): Definitions,” V17.0.0, Apr. 2022.
- S. Zhang, D. Yin, Y. Zhang, and W. Zhou, “Computing on Base Station Behavior Using Erlang Measurement and Call Detail Record,” IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 444–453, 2015.
- Umlaut, “The Great 2022 Mobile Network Test,” Special mobile networks, Jan. 2022.
- W. A. Hapsari, A. Umesh, M. Iwamura, M. Tomala, B. Gyula, and B. Sebire, “Minimization of drive tests solution in 3GPP,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 28–36, 2012.
- Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., “Huawei 5G wireless network planning solution white paper,” Tech. Rep., 2018, Accessed on 18/02/2023.
- D. He, B. Ai, K. Guan, L. Wang, Z. Zhong, and T. Kürner, “The Design and Applications of High-Performance Ray-Tracing Simulation Platform for 5G and Beyond Wireless Communications: A Tutorial,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 10–27, 2019.
- “Forsk atoll,” available on-line at https://www.forsk.com/atoll-overview.
- “Ranplan wireless,” available on-line at https://www.ranplanwireless.com/es/.
- K. Koutlia, B. Bojovic, Z. Ali, and S. Lagén, “Calibration of the 5g-lena system level simulator in 3gpp reference scenarios,” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, vol. 119, p. 102580, 2022.
- M. Mezzavilla, M. Zhang, M. Polese, R. Ford, S. Dutta, S. Rangan, and M. Zorzi, “End-to-end simulation of 5g mmwave networks,” IEEE Communications Surveys &\&& Tutorials, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 2237–2263, 2018.
- B. Leng, X. Guo, X. Zheng, B. Krishnamachari, and Z. Niu, “A wait-and-see two-threshold optimal sleeping policy for a single server with bursty traffic,” IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 528–540, 2017.
- E. Björnson, L. Sanguinetti, J. Hoydis, and M. Debbah, “Optimal Design of Energy-efficient Multi-User MIMO Systems: Is Massive MIMO The Answer?” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 3059–3075, 2015.
- G. Yu, Q. Chen, R. Yin, H. Zhang, and G. Y. Li, “Joint Downlink and Uplink Resource Allocation for Energy-Efficient Carrier Aggregation,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 3207–3218, 2015.
- López–Pérez, D. and De Domenico, A. and Piovesan, N. and Geng, X. and Bao, H. and Debbah, M., “Energy Efficiency of Multi-Carrier Massive MIMO Networks: Massive MIMO Meets Carrier Aggregation,” in IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), 2021, pp. 01–07.
- Y. S. Soh, T. Q. S. Quek, M. Kountouris, and H. Shin, “Energy efficient heterogeneous cellular networks,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 840–850, 2013.
- H. Celebi, Y. Yapici, I. Guvenç, and H. Schulzrinne, “Load-Based On/Off Scheduling for Energy-Efficient Delay-Tolerant 5G Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 955–970, 2019.
- M. Feng, S. Mao, and T. Jiang, “BOOST: Base Station on-off Switching Strategy for Green Massive MIMO HetNets,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 7319–7332, 2017.
- L. Chiaraviglio, F. Cuomo, M. Listanti, E. Manzia, and M. Santucci, “Fatigue-Aware Management of Cellular Networks Infrastructure with Sleep Modes,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 3028–3041, 2017.
- H.-N. Dai, R. C.-W. Wong, H. Wang, Z. Zheng, and A. V. Vasilakos, “Big data analytics for large-scale wireless networks: Challenges and opportunities,” ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 52, no. 5, Sep. 2019.
- 3GPP TSG RAN, “TR 37.817, Study on enhancement for Data Collection for NR and EN-DC,” V17.0.0, Apr. 2022.
- ——, “TR 37.816, Study on RAN-centric data collection and utilization for LTE and NR,” V16.0.0, Jul. 2019.
- C. Zhang, P. Patras, and H. Haddadi, “Deep learning in mobile and wireless networking: A survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys &\&& Tutorials, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 2224–2287, 2019.
- N. C. Luong, D. T. Hoang, S. Gong, D. Niyato, P. Wang, Y.-C. Liang, and D. I. Kim, “Applications of deep reinforcement learning in communications and networking: A survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys &\&& Tutorials, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 3133–3174, 2019.
- Z. Xing, H. Li, W. Liu, Z. Ren, J. Chen, J. Xu, and C. Qin, “Spectrum efficiency prediction for real-world 5g networks based on drive testing data,” in 2022 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), 2022, pp. 2136–2141.
- Z.-Q. Luo, X. Zheng, D. López-Pérez, Q. Yan, X. Chen, N. Wang, Q. Shi, T.-H. Chang, and A. Garcia-Rodriguez, “SRCON: A Data-Driven Network Performance Simulator for Real-World Wireless Networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 96–102, 2023.
- 3GPP TSG RAN, “TS 38.300, NR and NG-RAN Overall Description,” V16.6.0, Sep. 2019.
- ——, “TR 38.864, Study on network energy savings for NR,” V18.0.0, Jan. 2023.
- Z. Ghadialy. (2023, July) Over 21 Trillion KPIs per Week. [Online]. Available: https://www.operatorwatch.com/2023/07/over-21-trillion-kpis-per-week.html
- 3GPP TSG RAN, “TS 36.331, Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Radio Resource Control (RRC); Protocol specification,” V17.3.0, Jan. 2023.
- N. Piovesan, D. López–Pérez, A. De Domenico, X. Geng, H. Bao, and M. Debbah, “Machine Learning and Analytical Power Consumption Models for 5G Base Stations,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 60, no. 10, October 2022.
- S. M. Lundberg and S.-I. Lee, “A unified approach to interpreting model predictions,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30, I. Guyon, U. V. Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Garnett, Eds. Curran Associates, Inc., 2017, pp. 4765–4774.
- F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and E. Duchesnay, “Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 12, pp. 2825–2830, 2011.
- D. P. Kroese, T. J. Brereton, T. Taimre, and Z. I. Botev, “Why the monte carlo method is so important today,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, vol. 6, 2014.
- A. De Domenico and D. López-Pérez and N.Piovesan and G. Xinli and H. Bao, “Modelling User Transfer during Carrier Shutdown in Green 5G Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2023.
- G. Auer, V. Giannini, C. Desset, I. Godor, P. Skillermark, M. Olsson, M. A. Imran, D. Sabella, M. J. Gonzalez, O. Blume, and A. Fehske, “How much energy is needed to run a wireless network?” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 40–49, 2011.