Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
156 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

On Rate-Optimal Partitioning Classification from Observable and from Privatised Data (2312.14889v2)

Published 22 Dec 2023 in stat.ML, cs.CR, cs.LG, math.ST, and stat.TH

Abstract: In this paper we revisit the classical method of partitioning classification and study its convergence rate under relaxed conditions, both for observable (non-privatised) and for privatised data. Let the feature vector $X$ take values in $\mathbb{R}d$ and denote its label by $Y$. Previous results on the partitioning classifier worked with the strong density assumption, which is restrictive, as we demonstrate through simple examples. We assume that the distribution of $X$ is a mixture of an absolutely continuous and a discrete distribution, such that the absolutely continuous component is concentrated to a $d_a$ dimensional subspace. Here, we study the problem under much milder assumptions: in addition to the standard Lipschitz and margin conditions, a novel characteristic of the absolutely continuous component is introduced, by which the exact convergence rate of the classification error probability is calculated, both for the binary and for the multi-label cases. Interestingly, this rate of convergence depends only on the intrinsic dimension $d_a$. The privacy constraints mean that the data $(X_1,Y_1), \dots ,(X_n,Y_n)$ cannot be directly observed, and the classifiers are functions of the randomised outcome of a suitable local differential privacy mechanism. The statistician is free to choose the form of this privacy mechanism, and here we add Laplace distributed noises to the discontinuations of all possible locations of the feature vector $X_i$ and to its label $Y_i$. Again, tight upper bounds on the rate of convergence of the classification error probability are derived, without the strong density assumption, such that this rate depends on $2\,d_a$.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.