Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
144 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

One-Shot Initial Orbit Determination in Low-Earth Orbit (2312.13318v1)

Published 20 Dec 2023 in eess.SY, astro-ph.IM, cs.LG, cs.SY, and math.OC

Abstract: Due to the importance of satellites for society and the exponential increase in the number of objects in orbit, it is important to accurately determine the state (e.g., position and velocity) of these Resident Space Objects (RSOs) at any time and in a timely manner. State-of-the-art methodologies for initial orbit determination consist of Kalman-type filters that process sequential data over time and return the state and associated uncertainty of the object, as is the case of the Extended Kalman Filter (EKF). However, these methodologies are dependent on a good initial guess for the state vector and usually simplify the physical dynamical model, due to the difficulty of precisely modeling perturbative forces, such as atmospheric drag and solar radiation pressure. Other approaches do not require assumptions about the dynamical system, such as the trilateration method, and require simultaneous measurements, such as three measurements of range and range-rate for the particular case of trilateration. We consider the same setting of simultaneous measurements (one-shot), resorting to time delay and Doppler shift measurements. Based on recent advancements in the problem of moving target localization for sonar multistatic systems, we are able to formulate the problem of initial orbit determination as a Weighted Least Squares. With this approach, we are able to directly obtain the state of the object (position and velocity) and the associated covariance matrix from the Fisher's Information Matrix (FIM). We demonstrate that, for small noise, our estimator is able to attain the Cram\'er-Rao Lower Bound accuracy, i.e., the accuracy attained by the unbiased estimator with minimum variance. We also numerically demonstrate that our estimator is able to attain better accuracy on the state estimation than the trilateration method and returns a smaller uncertainty associated with the estimation.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (24)
  1. ESA’s Space Debris Office. (2023) Space debris by the numbers. [Online]. Available: https://www.esa.int/Space_Safety/Space_Debris/Space_debris_by_the_numbers
  2. Q. Lam, D. Junker, D. Anhalt, and D. Vallado, “Analysis of an extended Kalman filter based orbit determination system,” in AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, 2010, p. 7600.
  3. P. Pardal, H. Kuga, and R. V. de Moraes, “Robustness assessment between sigma point and extended kalman filter for orbit determination,” Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Sciences and Applications, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 35–44, 2011.
  4. A. B. Poore, J. M. Aristoff, J. T. Horwood, R. Armellin, W. T. Cerven, Y. Cheng, C. M. Cox, R. S. Erwin, J. H. Frisbee, M. D. Hejduk et al., “Covariance and uncertainty realism in space surveillance and tracking,” Numerica Corporation Fort Collins United States, Tech. Rep., 2016.
  5. S. J. Julier and J. K. Uhlmann, “New extension of the Kalman filter to nonlinear systems,” in Signal processing, sensor fusion, and target recognition VI, vol. 3068.   Spie, 1997, pp. 182–193.
  6. P. Escobal, “Methods of orbit determination,” Methods of orbit determination, 1970.
  7. S. Herrick, “Astrodynamics: Orbit determination, space navigation,” Celestial Mechanics, vol. 1, pp. 90–93, 1971.
  8. A. S. Kaushik, “A statistical comparison between gibbs and herrick-gibbs orbit determination methods,” Ph.D. dissertation, 2016.
  9. R. H. Gooding, “A new procedure for the solution of the classical problem of minimal orbit determination from three lines of sight,” Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, vol. 66, pp. 387–423, 1996.
  10. D. Izzo, “Revisiting lambert’s problem,” Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, vol. 121, pp. 1–15, 2015.
  11. R. H. Gooding, “A procedure for the solution of lambert’s orbital boundary-value problem,” Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 145–165, 1990.
  12. H. Shang, D. Chen, H. Cao, T. Fu, and M. Gao, “Initial orbit determination using very short arc data based on double-station observation,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 1596–1611, 2019.
  13. J. Qu, D. Chen, H. Cao, T. Fu, and S. Zhang, “Initial orbit determination method for low earth orbit objects using too-short arc based on bistatic radar,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 76 766–76 779, 2022.
  14. M. E. Hough, “Precise orbit determination using satellite radar ranging,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 1048–1058, 2012.
  15. L. Rui and K. Ho, “Efficient closed-form estimators for multistatic sonar localization,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 600–614, 2015.
  16. L. Yang, L. Yang, and K. Ho, “Moving target localization in multistatic sonar by differential delays and Doppler shifts,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1160–1164, 2016.
  17. M. Einemo and H. C. So, “Weighted least squares algorithm for target localization in distributed MIMO radar,” Signal Processing, vol. 115, pp. 144–150, 2015.
  18. S. J. Ostro, “Planetary radar astronomy,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 65, no. 4, p. 1235, 1993.
  19. H. Klinkrad, J. Alarcon, and N. Sanchez, “Collision avoidance for operational esa satellites,” in 4th European Conference on Space Debris, vol. 587, 2005, p. 509.
  20. T. Kleinig, B. Smith, and C. Capon, “Collision avoidance of satellites using ionospheric drag,” Acta Astronautica, 2022.
  21. C. Bonnal, D. McKnight, C. Phipps, C. Dupont, S. Missonnier, L. Lequette, M. Merle, and S. Rommelaere, “Just in time collision avoidance–a review,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 170, pp. 637–651, 2020.
  22. N. Reiland, A. J. Rosengren, R. Malhotra, and C. Bombardelli, “Assessing and minimizing collisions in satellite mega-constellations,” Advances in Space Research, vol. 67, no. 11, pp. 3755–3774, 2021.
  23. Y.-C. Liu and L. Liu, “Orbit determination using satellite-to-satellite tracking data,” Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 1, no. 3, p. 281, 2001.
  24. F. Vonbun, P. Argentiero, and P. Schmid, “Orbit determination accuracies using satellite-to-satellite tracking,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, no. 6, pp. 834–842, 1978.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.