Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
162 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Smart Connected Farms and Networked Farmers to Tackle Climate Challenges Impacting Agricultural Production (2312.12338v1)

Published 19 Dec 2023 in cs.CY

Abstract: To meet the grand challenges of agricultural production including climate change impacts on crop production, a tight integration of social science, technology and agriculture experts including farmers are needed. There are rapid advances in information and communication technology, precision agriculture and data analytics, which are creating a fertile field for the creation of smart connected farms (SCF) and networked farmers. A network and coordinated farmer network provides unique advantages to farmers to enhance farm production and profitability, while tackling adverse climate events. The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive overview of the state of the art in SCF including the advances in engineering, computer sciences, data sciences, social sciences and economics including data privacy, sharing and technology adoption.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (206)
  1. Climate change risks pushing one-third of global food production outside the safe climatic space. One Earth, 4(5):720–729, 2021.
  2. Anupama Mahato. Climate change and its impact on agriculture. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 4(4):1–6, 2014.
  3. Internet of things. Academic Press, 2014.
  4. Jeffrey M Perkel. The internet of things comes to the lab. Nature, 542(7639):125–126, 2017.
  5. Smart agriculture wireless sensor routing protocol and node location algorithm based on internet of things technology. IEEE Sensors Journal, 21(22):24967–24973, 2020.
  6. KA Patil and NR Kale. A model for smart agriculture using iot. In 2016 international conference on global trends in signal processing, information computing and communication (ICGTSPICC), pages 543–545. IEEE, 2016.
  7. N Sakthipriya. An effective method for crop monitoring using wireless sensor network. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 20(9):1127–1132, 2014.
  8. GV Satyanarayana and SD Mazaruddin. Wireless sensor based remote monitoring system for agriculture using zigbee and gps. In Conference on advances in communication and control systems, volume 3, pages 237–241, 2013.
  9. Big data and ai revolution in precision agriculture: Survey and challenges. IEEE Access, 9:110209–110222, 2021.
  10. Agrisens: Iot-based dynamic irrigation scheduling system for water management of irrigated crops. IEEE Internet Things Journal, 8(6):5023–5030, 2021.
  11. The utility maximization for data collection in uav-enabled sensor networks via judiciously determining hovering locations. 19th IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom), pages 1–10, 2021.
  12. COALESCE. https://coalesce.me.iastate.edu/, 2021a. Accessed: 2022-11-4.
  13. A novel multirobot system for plant phenotyping. Robotics, 7(4):61, 2018.
  14. Cyber-agricultural systems for crop breeding and sustainable production. Trends in Plant Science, 2023.
  15. Economics of robots and automation in field crop production. Precision Agriculture, 21(2):278–299, 2020.
  16. Moving from uniform to variable fertilizer rates on iowa corn: Effects on rates and returns. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, pages 385–400, 1998.
  17. Precision agriculture and sustainability. Precision agriculture, 5(4):359–387, 2004.
  18. Smart poultry management: Smart sensors, big data, and the internet of things. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 170:105291, 2020.
  19. Design and implementation of the span greenhouse agriculture internet of things system. In 2015 International Conference on Fluid Power and Mechatronics (FPM), pages 398–401. IEEE, 2015.
  20. Impact of wild blueberry harvesters on weed seed dispersal within and between fields. Weed Science, 57(5):541–546, 2009.
  21. Primary and secondary pesticide drift profiles from a peach orchard. Chemosphere, 177:303–310, 2017.
  22. On-farm performance and farmers’ perceptions of droughttego-climate-smart maize hybrids in kenya. 2019.
  23. Keith Cressman. Role of remote sensing in desert locust early warning. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 7(1):075098, 2013.
  24. Smart integrated farm network for rural agricultural communities (SIRAC). https://sirac.agron.iastate.edu/, 2021b. Accessed: 2022-12-5.
  25. Peter M Kyveryga. On-farm research: Experimental approaches, analytical frameworks, case studies, and impact. Agronomy Journal, 111(6):2633–2635, 2019.
  26. Remote sensing for agricultural applications: A meta-review. Remote Sensing of Environment, 236:111402, 2020.
  27. Katherine LoPiccalo. Impact of broadband penetration on u.s. farm productivity. OEA Working Paper 50 Office of Economics and Analysis FCC, 2021.
  28. E-Rate - schools & libraries USF program. https://www.fcc.gov/general/e-rate-schools-libraries-usf-program, April 2012a. Accessed: 2022-11-4.
  29. Lifeline program for Low-Income consumers. https://www.fcc.gov/general/lifeline-program-low-income-consumers, January 2012b. Accessed: 2022-11-4.
  30. Connect america fund (CAF). https://www.fcc.gov/general/connect-america-fund-caf, April 2012c. Accessed: 2022-11-4.
  31. Rural health care program. https://www.fcc.gov/general/rural-health-care-program, November 2010. Accessed: 2022-11-4.
  32. Unoccupied aerial systems imagery for phenotyping in cotton, maize, soybean, and wheat breeding. Crop Science, 63(4):1722–1749, 2023.
  33. David Shepardson. FCC awards $9.2 billion to deploy broadband to 5.2 million U.S. homes, businesses. Reuters, December 2020.
  34. High-throughput field phenotyping of leaves, leaf sheaths, culms and ears of spring barley cultivars at anthesis and dough ripeness. Frontiers in plant science, 8:1920, 2017.
  35. Uas-based plant phenotyping for research and breeding applications. Plant Phenomics, 2021, 2021.
  36. Identification of soybean foliar diseases using unmanned aerial vehicle images. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 14(12):2190–2194, 2017.
  37. Deep learning-based phenotyping for genome wide association studies of sudden death syndrome in soybean. Frontiers in plant science, 13, 2022a.
  38. Computer vision and machine learning for robust phenotyping in genome-wide studies. Scientific Reports, 7(1):1–11, 2017.
  39. Soybean iron deficiency chlorosis high-throughput phenotyping using an unmanned aircraft system. Plant methods, 15(1):1–9, 2019.
  40. A real-time phenotyping framework using machine learning for plant stress severity rating in soybean. Plant methods, 13(1):23, 2017.
  41. Uav-based crop and weed classification for smart farming. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 3024–3031. IEEE, 2017.
  42. High-throughput phenotyping of soybean maturity using time series uav imagery and convolutional neural networks. Remote Sensing, 12(21):3617, 2020.
  43. Automatic uav-based counting of seedlings in sugar-beet field and extension to maize and strawberry. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 191:106493, 2021.
  44. Cotton yield estimation model based on machine learning using time series uav remote sensing data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 104:102511, 2021.
  45. Hyperspectral band selection using genetic algorithm and support vector machines for early identification of charcoal rot disease in soybean stems. Plant methods, 14(1):1–13, 2018.
  46. Generating 3d hyperspectral information with lightweight uav snapshot cameras for vegetation monitoring: From camera calibration to quality assurance. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 108:245–259, 2015.
  47. Remote thermal infrared imaging for rapid screening of sudden death syndrome in soybean. In 2018 ASABE Annual International Meeting, page 1. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2018.
  48. Unmanned aerial system and satellite-based high resolution imagery for high-throughput phenotyping in dry bean. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 165:104965, 2019.
  49. Thermal imaging to monitor the crop-water status in almonds by using the non-water stress baselines. Scientia Horticulturae, 238:91–97, 2018.
  50. The daily erosion project–daily estimates of water runoff, soil detachment, and erosion. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 43(5):1105–1117, 2018.
  51. Fine-scale prediction of biomass and leaf nitrogen content in sugarcane using uav lidar and multispectral imaging. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 92:102177, 2020.
  52. K. Li. Computation offloading strategy optimization with multiple heterogeneous servers in mobile edge computing. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing, pages 1–1, 2019.
  53. Sustainable deep learning at grid edge for real-time high impedance fault detection. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing, pages 1–1, 2018.
  54. Distributed deep learning for persistent monitoring of agricultural fields. In NeurIPS 2021 AI for Science Workshop, 2021a.
  55. Convergence of edge computing and deep learning: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, pages 1–1, 2020.
  56. Mobile cloud computing with voltage scaling and data compression. In Proc. SPAWC, pages 1–5, 2017.
  57. Collaborative deep learning in fixed topology networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 2017.
  58. Cross-gradient aggregation for decentralized learning from non-iid data. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 3036–3046. PMLR, 2021b.
  59. An efficient on-line computation offloading approach for large-scale mobile edge computing via deep reinforcement learning. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing (Special Issue on Edge AI As-a-Service), page to appear, 2022.
  60. Dlsense: Distributed learning-based smart virtual sensing for precision agriculture. IEEE Sensors Journal, 21(16):17556–17563, 2020.
  61. A survey on fog computing for the internet of things. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 52:71–99, 2019.
  62. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 770–778, 2016.
  63. Crop yield prediction integrating genotype and weather variables using deep learning. Plos one, 16(6):e0252402, 2021a.
  64. Leveraging genomic prediction to scan germplasm collection for crop improvement. PloS one, 12(6):e0179191, 2017.
  65. Patriot: A pipeline for tracing identity-by-descent for chromosome segments to improve genomic prediction in self-pollinating crop species. Frontiers in plant science, page 2095, 2021b.
  66. Energy-efficient edge-fog-cloud architecture for iot-based smart agriculture environment. IEEE Access, 9:110480–110492, 2021.
  67. bioMCS 2.0: A distributed, energy-aware fog-based framework for data forwarding in mobile crowdsensing. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 73: 101381, 2021.
  68. Improving iot data quality in mobile crowdsensing: A cross validation approach. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(3):5651–5664, 2019.
  69. Energy efficient data forwarding scheme in fog based ubiquitous system with deadline constraints. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 17(1):213–226, 2020.
  70. Quantitative analysis of deep leaf: a plant disease detector on smart edge. In IEEE Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP), 2020.
  71. Porting deep neural networks on the edge via dynamic k-means compression: A case study of plant disease detection. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 75:101437, 2021.
  72. A drone-based application for scouting halyomorpha halys bugs in orchards with multifunctional nets. In 20th IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom) Demo, 2022a.
  73. Drone-based optimal and heuristic orienteering algorithms towards bug detection in orchards. In 18th International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS), 2022b.
  74. Daknet: Rethinking connectivity in developing nations. Computer, 37(1):78–83, 2004.
  75. Jaldimac: taking the distance further. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM workshop on networked systems for developing regions, page 2. ACM, 2010.
  76. The village base station. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Workshop on Networked Systems for Developing Regions, page 14. ACM, 2010.
  77. Lifenet: a flexible ad hoc networking solution for transient environments, volume 41. ACM, 2011.
  78. Designing delay constrained hybrid ad hoc network infrastructure for post-disaster communication. Ad Hoc Networks, 25:406–429, 2015.
  79. Gsm whitespaces: An opportunity for rural cellular service. In Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DYSPAN), 2014 IEEE International Symposium on, pages 271–282. IEEE, 2014.
  80. A Survey on LoRa Networking: Research Problems, Current Solutions, and Open Issues. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 22(1):371–388, 2020.
  81. An energy efficient smart metering system using edge computing in lora network. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing (Special Issue on Energy-Efficient Edge Computing), page to appear, 2022.
  82. Designing sustainable smart connected communities using dynamic spectrum access via band selection. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Built Environments, page 12. ACM, 2017.
  83. Designing green communication systems for smart and connected communities via dynamic spectrum access. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN), 14(3-4):31, 2018.
  84. Next generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: A survey. Computer networks, 50(13):2127–2159, 2006.
  85. Dynamic spectrum access: from cognitive radio to network radio. IEEE Wireless Communications, 19(1), 2012.
  86. 2010.
  87. Feasibility, architecture and cost considerations of using tvws for rural internet access in 5g. In Innovations in Clouds, Internet and Networks (ICIN), 2017 20th Conference on, pages 23–30. IEEE, 2017.
  88. White space networking with wi-fi like connectivity. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 39(4):27–38, 2009.
  89. Licensed spectrum sharing schemes for mobile operators: A survey and outlook. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 18(4):2591–2623, 2016.
  90. 2015. Last accessed on Jan, 2019.
  91. I. Canada. Canada whitespace. http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/smt-gst.nsf/eng/sf10928.html. a. Last accessed on Jan, 2019.
  92. Imda. Singapore whitespace. https://www.imda.gov.sg/regulations-licensing-and-consultations/frameworks-and-policies/spectrum-management-and-coordination/spectrum-planning/tv-white-space. b.
  93. Tenet. South Africa Whitespace. https://www.tenet.ac.za/tvws. a.
  94. To white space or not to white space: That is the trial within the ofcom tv white spaces pilot. In Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN), 2015 IEEE International Symposium on, pages 11–22. IEEE, 2015.
  95. mtsfb. Malaysia whitespaceo. www.mtsfb.org.my/working-group/tv-white-space-ws-wg.
  96. Techweez. Kenya Whitespace. www.techweez.com/2016/10/31/ca-white-spaces-rules/. b.
  97. Cran. Namibia Whitespace. https://www.cran.na/images/docs/GGs/5480-Gen_N150.pdf. c.
  98. Techweez. Namibia Whitespace. http://techweez.com/2014/01/15/microsoft-whitespaces-broadband-namibia/. d.
  99. ENACOM. Argentina Whitespace. https://www.enacom.gob.ar/. e.
  100. Toward enabling broadband for a billion plus population with tv white spaces. IEEE Communications Magazine, 54(7):28–34, 2016.
  101. Cognitive radio on tv bands: a new approach to provide wireless connectivity for rural areas. IEEE Wireless Communications, 15(3), 2008.
  102. Lte-advanced in white space: A complementary technology. Radisys White Paper, 2011.
  103. Plant disease identification using explainable 3d deep learning on hyperspectral images. Plant methods, 15(1):98, 2019.
  104. A deep learning framework to discern and count microscopic nematode eggs. Scientific reports, 8(1):1–11, 2018.
  105. Self-supervised learning improves agricultural pest classification. In AI for Agriculture and Food Systems, 2021.
  106. Deep learning-based phenotyping for genome wide association studies of sudden death syndrome in soybean. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 2022b.
  107. Challenges and opportunities in machine-augmented plant stress phenotyping. Trends in Plant Science, 26(1):53–69, 2021.
  108. Exploring the use of 3d point cloud data for improved plant stress rating. In AI for Agriculture and Food Systems, 2021.
  109. An explainable deep machine vision framework for plant stress phenotyping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(18):4613–4618, 2018.
  110. Comparative prediction accuracy of hyperspectral bands for different soybean crop variables: From leaf area to seed composition. Field Crops Research, 271:108260, 2021.
  111. Using large soybean historical data to study genotype by environment variation and identify mega-environments with the integration of genetic and non-genetic factors. bioRxiv, 2022.
  112. Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. McKinsey Global Institute, 2011.
  113. M Kunisch. Big data in agriculture–perspectives for a service organization. Landtechnik, 71(1):1–3, 2016.
  114. A review on the practice of big data analysis in agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 143:23–37, 2017.
  115. Big data in smart farming–a review. Agricultural systems, 153:69–80, 2017.
  116. Development of optimized phenomic predictors for efficient plant breeding decisions using phenomic-assisted selection in soybean. Plant Phenomics, 2019:5809404, 2019a.
  117. Machine learning approach for prescriptive plant breeding. Scientific reports, 9(1):1–12, 2019b.
  118. A weakly supervised deep learning framework for sorghum head detection and counting. Plant Phenomics, 2019:1525874, 2019.
  119. Deep learning for plant stress phenotyping: trends and future perspectives. Trends in plant science, 23(10):883–898, 2018.
  120. A systematic literature review on deep learning applications for precision cattle farming. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 187:106313, 2021.
  121. Machine learning for high-throughput stress phenotyping in plants. Trends in plant science, 21(2):110–124, 2016.
  122. Deep multiview image fusion for soybean yield estimation in breeding applications. Plant Phenomics, 2021, 2021.
  123. Self-supervised learning improves classification of agriculturally important insect pests in plants. The Plant Phenome Journal, 6(1):e20079, 2023.
  124. Agri-gnn: A novel genotypic-topological graph neural network framework built on graphsage for optimized yield prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.13037, 2023.
  125. When machine learning meets privacy: A survey and outlook. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 54(2):1–36, 2021.
  126. Privacy preservation in distributed deep learning: A survey on distributed deep learning, privacy preservation techniques used and interesting research directions. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 61:102949, 2021.
  127. Federated learning: Strategies for improving communication efficiency. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.05492, 2016.
  128. Towards federated learning at scale: System design. Proceedings of Machine Learning and Systems, 1:374–388, 2019.
  129. Federated learning for internet of things: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 23(3):1622–1658, 2021.
  130. A survey on federated learning systems: vision, hype and reality for data privacy and protection. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2021.
  131. Advances and open problems in federated learning. Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning, 14(1–2):1–210, 2021.
  132. A federated learning-based crop yield prediction for agricultural production risk management. In 2022 IEEE Delhi Section Conference (DELCON), pages 1–7. IEEE, 2022.
  133. Felids: Federated learning-based intrusion detection system for agricultural internet of things. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 165:17–31, 2022.
  134. Asynchronous decentralized sgd with quantized and local updates. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:6829–6842, 2021.
  135. Privacy-aware adaptive data encryption strategy of big data in cloud computing. In 2016 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cyber Security and Cloud Computing (CSCloud), pages 273–278. IEEE, 2016.
  136. {{\{{GAZELLE}}\}}: A low latency framework for secure neural network inference. In 27th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 18), pages 1651–1669, 2018.
  137. Delphi: A cryptographic inference service for neural networks. In 29th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 20), pages 2505–2522, 2020.
  138. Privacy-preserving deep learning via additively homomorphic encryption. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 13(5):1333–1345, 2017.
  139. Privacy-preserving and verifiable deep learning inference based on secret sharing. Neurocomputing, 483:221–234, 2022.
  140. Cynthia Dwork. Differential privacy: A survey of results. In International conference on theory and applications of models of computation, pages 1–19. Springer, 2008.
  141. Tinygarble2: Smart, efficient, and scalable yao’s garble circuit. In Proceedings of the 2020 Workshop on Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning in Practice, pages 65–67, 2020.
  142. Privacy-preserving deep models for plant stress phenotyping. In AI for Agriculture and Food Systems, 2021a.
  143. Sphynx: Relu-efficient network design for private inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.11755, 2021b.
  144. Distributed additive encryption and quantization for privacy preserving federated deep learning. Neurocomputing, 463:309–327, 2021.
  145. Privfl: Practical privacy-preserving federated regressions on high-dimensional data over mobile networks. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Cloud Computing Security Workshop, pages 57–68, 2019.
  146. Towards efficient and privacy-preserving federated deep learning. In ICC 2019-2019 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC), pages 1–6. IEEE, 2019.
  147. Privacy-preserving collaborative deep learning with unreliable participants. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 15:1486–1500, 2019.
  148. Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In Artificial intelligence and statistics, pages 1273–1282. PMLR, 2017.
  149. The role of cross-silo federated learning in facilitating data sharing in the agri-food sector. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 193:106648, 2022.
  150. Pefl: Deep privacy-encoding-based federated learning framework for smart agriculture. IEEE Micro, 42(1):33–40, 2021.
  151. Farmer Netwoek Design Manual, 2015.
  152. On-Farm Replicated Strip Trials, chapter 13, pages 189–207. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2018. ISBN 9780891183679. doi:https://doi.org/10.2134/precisionagbasics.2016.0096. URL https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.2134/precisionagbasics.2016.0096.
  153. A framework for visualization and analysis of agronomic field trials from on-farm research networks. Agronomy Journal, 111(6):2712–2723, 2019.
  154. Farmers as researchers: In-depth interviews to discern participant motivation and impact. Agronomy Journal, 111(6):2670–2680, 2019.
  155. Data sharing platforms: How value is created from agricultural data. Agricultural Systems, 193:103241, 2021.
  156. Farmers and their data: An examination of farmers’ reluctance to share their data through the lens of the laws impacting smart farming. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90:100301, 2019.
  157. “if they don’t tell us what they do with it, why would we trust them?” trust, transparency and benefit-sharing in smart farming. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90:100285, 2019.
  158. New technology, ethical tensions and the mediating role of translational research. Ethical Tensions from New Technology: The Case of Agricultural Biotechnology, 6:162, 2018.
  159. Between forestry and farming: Policy and environmental implications of the barriers to agroforestry adoption. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d’agroeconomie, 60(2):155–175, 2012.
  160. Mark Shucksmith. Farm household behaviour and the transition to post-productivism. Journal of agricultural economics, 44(3):466–478, 1993.
  161. Future changes in british agriculture: projecting divergent farm household behaviour. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 53(1):37–50, 2002.
  162. Farmers, the practice of farming and the future of agroforestry: an application of bourdieu’s concepts of field and habitus. Rural Sociology, 68(1):64–86, 2003.
  163. The role of networks of practice and webs of influencers on farmers’ engagement with and learning about agricultural innovations. Journal of Rural Studies, 26(4):404–417, 2010.
  164. Using translational research to enhance farmers’ voice: a case study of the potential introduction of gm cassava in kenya’s coast. Agriculture and Human Values, 31(4):673–681, 2014.
  165. Jane L Glover. Capital usage in adverse situations: Applying bourdieu’s theory of capital to family farm businesses. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 31(4):485–497, 2010.
  166. Human and institutional dimensions of agroforestry. North American Agroforestry, pages 489–519, 2021.
  167. Elinor Ostrom. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939):419–422, 2009.
  168. Family businesses and adaptation: A dynamic capabilities approach. Journal of family and economic issues, 39(4):683–698, 2018.
  169. Steven H Woolf. The meaning of translational research and why it matters. Jama, 299(2):211–213, 2008.
  170. Complexity in climate-change impacts: an analytical framework for effects mediated by plant disease. Plant Pathology, 60(1):15–30, 2011.
  171. The effects of climate variability and the color of weather time series on agricultural diseases and pests, and on decisions for their management. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 170:216–227, 2013.
  172. Local forecast communication in the altiplano. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 90(1):85–92, 2009.
  173. Effects of seasonal climate forecasts and participatory workshops among subsistence farmers in zimbabwe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(35):12623–12628, 2005.
  174. Human and institutional dimensions of agroforestry. North American agroforestry: an integrated science and practice, pages 339–367, 2009.
  175. Socio-ecological dimensions of andean pastoral landscape change: bridging traditional ecological knowledge and satellite image analysis in sajama national park, bolivia. Regional Environmental Change, 19(5):1353–1369, 2019.
  176. Learning by doing and learning from others: Human capital and technical change in agriculture. Journal of political Economy, 103(6):1176–1209, 1995.
  177. Farmers’ willingness to participate in a big data platform. Agribusiness, 36(1):20–36, 2020.
  178. Factors determining adoption of new agricultural technology by smallholder farmers in developing countries. Journal of Economics and sustainable development, 6(5), 2015.
  179. Uncertainty, learning, and technology adoption in agriculture. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 42(1):42–53, 2020.
  180. The economics of risk, uncertainty and learning in the adoption of new agricultural technologies: where are we on the learning curve? Agricultural systems, 75(2-3):215–234, 2003.
  181. E Katung and Kenneth Akankwasa. Community-based organizations and their effect on the adoption of agricultural technologies in uganda: a study of banana (musa spp.) pest management technology. In IV International Symposium on Banana: International Conference on Banana and Plantain in Africa: Harnessing International 879, pages 719–726, 2008.
  182. Social networks and technology adoption in northern mozambique. The economic journal, 116(514):869–902, 2006.
  183. Inside the black box: technology and economics. cambridge university press, 1982.
  184. Empathy-conditioned conservation:“walking in the shoes of others” as a conservation farmer. Land Economics, 87(3):433–452, 2011.
  185. Will farmers trade profits for stewardship? heterogeneous motivations for farm practice selection. Land Economics, 84(1):66–82, 2008.
  186. Agricultural adoption and behavioral economics: Bridging the gap. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 42(1):54–66, 2020.
  187. Social capital and public goods. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 39(4):474–481, 2010.
  188. Social capital and contributions in a public-goods experiment. American Economic Review, 94(2):373–376, 2004.
  189. Trust, voluntary cooperation, and socio-economic background: survey and experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55(4):505–531, 2004.
  190. Fragility of the provision of local public goods to private and collective risks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(5):921–925, 2017.
  191. Cooperation and competition in intergenerational experiments in the field and the laboratory. American Economic Review, 99(3):956–78, 2009.
  192. Sabrina Teyssier. Inequity and risk aversion in sequential public good games. Public Choice, 151(1):91–119, 2012.
  193. On the provision of public goods with probabilistic and ambiguous thresholds. Environmental and Resource economics, 61(3):365–383, 2015.
  194. Elaine M Liu. Time to change what to sow: Risk preferences and technology adoption decisions of cotton farmers in china. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(4):1386–1403, 2013.
  195. Risk pooling, risk preferences, and social networks. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4(2):134–67, 2012.
  196. Robert E Lucas Jr. On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of monetary economics, 22(1):3–42, 1988.
  197. Daron Acemoglu. Introduction to modern economic growth. Privredna kretanja i ekonomska politika, 123:89, 2010.
  198. Learning about a new technology: Pineapple in ghana. American economic review, 100(1):35–69, 2010.
  199. K. M. Moore. Network framing of pest management knowledge and practice. Rural Sociology, 73(3):414–439, 2008.
  200. Neighbors and extension agents in ethiopia: Who matters more for technology adoption? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 96(1):308–327, 2014.
  201. Input diffusion and the evolution of production networks. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2014.
  202. Social learning and incentives for experimentation and communication. The Review of Economic Studies, 86(3):976–1009, 2019.
  203. Anthony Martin. Yield benefits from combined applications of foliar fungicides and insecticides on soybean. working paper, 2022.
  204. iNaturalist. inaturalist, 2023. URL https://www.inaturalist.org/. Accessed: 2023-12-18.
  205. Deep learning powered real-time identification of insects using citizen science data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.02507, 2023.
  206. Out-of-distribution detection algorithms for robust insect classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.01823, 2023.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now