Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

LLMind: Orchestrating AI and IoT with LLM for Complex Task Execution (2312.09007v4)

Published 14 Dec 2023 in cs.IT, cs.AI, and math.IT

Abstract: Task-oriented communications are an important element in future intelligent IoT systems. Existing IoT systems, however, are limited in their capacity to handle complex tasks, particularly in their interactions with humans to accomplish these tasks. In this paper, we present LLMind, an LLM-based task-oriented AI agent framework that enables effective collaboration among IoT devices, with humans communicating high-level verbal instructions, to perform complex tasks. Inspired by the functional specialization theory of the brain, our framework integrates an LLM with domain-specific AI modules, enhancing its capabilities. Complex tasks, which may involve collaborations of multiple domain-specific AI modules and IoT devices, are executed through a control script generated by the LLM using a Language-Code transformation approach, which first converts language descriptions to an intermediate finite-state machine (FSM) before final precise transformation to code. Furthermore, the framework incorporates a novel experience accumulation mechanism to enhance response speed and effectiveness, allowing the framework to evolve and become progressively sophisticated through continuing user and machine interactions.

PDF HTML Abstract

Orchestrating AI and IoT for Complex Task Execution with LLMind Framework

Introduction to LLMind Framework

In the field of artificial intelligence, the interplay between LLMs and the Internet of Things (IoT) has ushered in innovative approaches to handling complex task execution through automation and intelligent planning. The newly unveiled LLMind framework represents a significant step forward in this burgeoning field. It embodies a sophisticated AI agent system that leverages LLMs' potent capabilities, melded with domain-specific AI modules, to orchestrate IoT devices towards accomplishing intricate, multi-faceted tasks.

Unlike traditional models that grapple with issues of efficiency, resource accessibility, and complex task management, LLMind introduces a suite of mechanisms designed to transcend these limitations. Central to its strategy is the integration of domain-specific AI modules with the foundational LLM orchestrator, inspired by the functional specialization theory of the brain. This amalgamation enhances the system's flexibility and practical application by allowing for specialized task executions within a broader, general-purpose framework.

Framework Design and Operation

The framework’s architecture is segmented into five principal components: user interface, LLM, coordinator, AI modules, and IoT devices. Through a user-friendly interface—implemented via popular social media platforms—users can assign tasks to the AI agent, which then formulates control scripts via the LLM to direct AI modules and IoT devices.

The coordinator, a pivot within the framework, integrates error handling, context repository, experience archive, and script execution functionalities. This comprehensive oversight ensures smooth operation across the system's components and enhances its adaptative capacity through historical data accumulation and real-time feedback loops.

Of particular note is the Language-Code transformation approach, utilizing a finite-state machine (FSM) to bridge the gap between user command language and executable control scripts. This technique significantly improves the precision and reliability of task execution scripts, addressing inherent challenges in directly translating user commands into code.

Implications and Future Directions

The introduction of the LLMind framework paves the way for more nuanced and efficient interactions between AI and IoT ecosystems. By facilitating the intricate coordination required for complex task executions, this model demonstrates substantial potential in enhancing IoT devices' autonomy and intelligence. Key experimental setups—including check-in and security scenarios, and network management tasks—underscore LLMind’s capacity to handle varied, sophisticated assignments with notable efficiency and adaptability.

On a theoretical level, LLMind's methodological contributions—spanning from its innovative use of domain-specific AI modules and FSM-based script generation to historical script retrieval—offer a rich vein of inquiry for further research. Practically, the framework stands to revolutionize how IoT devices are managed and integrated into daily tasks, signaling a shift towards more dynamic, intelligent, and user-centric AI applications.

Concluding Thoughts

In summary, the LLMind framework heralds a novel direction in the integration of LLMs and IoT for executing complex tasks. It addresses previous models' shortcomings with its innovative design and operational mechanisms, promising enhanced efficiency, scalability, and user engagement in IoT device management. As this field evolves, LLMind's foundational principles and methodologies may well inform future developments, guiding toward an era of more sophisticated, seamlessly interconnected AI and IoT ecosystems.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown Bookmark Chat Bubble Oval Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Chat (Pro)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (14)
  1. W. Huang, F. Xia, T. Xiao, H. Chan, J. Liang, P. Florence, A. Zeng, J. Tompson, I. Mordatch, Y. Chebotar et al., “Inner monologue: Embodied reasoning through planning with language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.05608, 2022.
  2. J. Mao, Y. Qian, H. Zhao, and Y. Wang, “GPT-driver: Learning to drive with GPT,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.01415, 2023.
  3. A. Kaplan and M. Haenlein, “Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? on the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence,” Business horizons, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 15–25, 2019.
  4. M. Asay, “Are large language models wrong for coding?” InfoWorld, 05 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.infoworld.com/article/3697272/are-large-language-models-wrong-for-coding.html
  5. P. Gladyshev, “Finite state machine approach to digital event reconstruction,” Digital Investigation, vol. 1, 05 2004.
  6. G. Jocher, “YOLOv8 documentation,” docs.ultralytics.com, 05 2020. [Online]. Available: https://docs.ultralytics.com/
  7. ageitgey, “ageitgey/face_recognition,” GitHub, 06 2019. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/ageitgey/face_recognition/
  8. Y. Xia, M. Shenoy, N. Jazdi, and M. Weyrich, “Towards autonomous system: flexible modular production system enhanced with large language model agents,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.14721, 2023.
  9. W. Huang, C. Wang, R. Zhang, Y. Li, J. Wu, and L. Fei-Fei, “Voxposer: Composable 3D value maps for robotic manipulation with language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.05973, 2023.
  10. Y. Shen, K. Song, X. Tan, D. Li, W. Lu, and Y. Zhuang, “HuggingGPT: Solving ai tasks with ChatGPT and its friends in HuggingFace,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.17580, 2023.
  11. C. H. Song, J. Wu, C. Washington, B. M. Sadler, W.-L. Chao, and Y. Su, “LLM-planner: Few-shot grounded planning for embodied agents with large language models,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2023, pp. 2998–3009.
  12. L. Wang, C. Ma, X. Feng, Z. Zhang, H. Yang, J. Zhang, Z. Chen, J. Tang, X. Chen, Y. Lin et al., “A survey on large language model based autonomous agents,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.11432, 2023.
  13. S.-G.  , “Github - Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT: An experimental open-source attempt to make GPT-4 fully autonomous.” https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT.
  14. “Auto-GPT unmasked: The hype and hard truths of its production pitfalls,” jina.ai. [Online]. Available: https://jina.ai/news/auto-gpt-unmasked-hype-hard-truths-production-pitfalls/
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Hongwei Cui (2 papers)
  2. Yuyang Du (14 papers)
  3. Qun Yang (22 papers)
  4. Yulin Shao (56 papers)
  5. Soung Chang Liew (98 papers)
Citations (21)
View on Semantic Scholar