Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
169 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Explainable Trajectory Representation through Dictionary Learning (2312.08052v1)

Published 13 Dec 2023 in cs.LG and cs.DM

Abstract: Trajectory representation learning on a network enhances our understanding of vehicular traffic patterns and benefits numerous downstream applications. Existing approaches using classic machine learning or deep learning embed trajectories as dense vectors, which lack interpretability and are inefficient to store and analyze in downstream tasks. In this paper, an explainable trajectory representation learning framework through dictionary learning is proposed. Given a collection of trajectories on a network, it extracts a compact dictionary of commonly used subpaths called "pathlets", which optimally reconstruct each trajectory by simple concatenations. The resulting representation is naturally sparse and encodes strong spatial semantics. Theoretical analysis of our proposed algorithm is conducted to provide a probabilistic bound on the estimation error of the optimal dictionary. A hierarchical dictionary learning scheme is also proposed to ensure the algorithm's scalability on large networks, leading to a multi-scale trajectory representation. Our framework is evaluated on two large-scale real-world taxi datasets. Compared to previous work, the dictionary learned by our method is more compact and has better reconstruction rate for new trajectories. We also demonstrate the promising performance of this method in downstream tasks including trip time prediction task and data compression.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (15)
  1. T. H.-N. CAO Han-Lin, “Survey on Trajectory Representation Learning Techniques,” Journal of Software, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1461–1479, Jan. 2021.
  2. P. Y. e. al, “T3S: Effective Representation Learning for Trajectory Similarity Computation,” in 2021 IEEE 37th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). IEEE, 2021., 2021.
  3. Y. Liang and Z. Zhao, “NetTraj: A Network-Based Vehicle Trajectory Prediction Model With Directional Representation and Spatiotemporal Attention Mechanisms,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 14 470–14 481, Sep. 2022.
  4. N. Zygouras and D. Gunopulos, “Corridor Learning Using Individual Trajectories,” in 2018 19th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM), Jun. 2018, pp. 155–160.
  5. J. Zou, Y. Cui, F. Wan, Q. Ye, and J. Jiao, “A cluster specific latent dirichlet allocation model for trajectory clustering in crowded videos,” in 2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Oct. 2014, pp. 2348–2352.
  6. P. Newson and J. Krumm, “Hidden Markov map matching through noise and sparseness,” in Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems.   Seattle Washington: ACM, Nov. 2009, pp. 336–343.
  7. C. Chen, H. Su, Q. Huang, L. Zhang, and L. Guibas, “Pathlet learning for compressing and planning trajectories,” in Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems.   Orlando Florida: ACM, Nov. 2013, pp. 392–395.
  8. D. Zhang, J. Zhao, F. Zhang, and T. He, “UrbanCPS: a cyber-physical system based on multi-source big infrastructure data for heterogeneous model integration,” in Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Sixth International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems, ser. ICCPS ’15.   New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, Apr. 2015, pp. 238–247.
  9. L. Moreira-Matias, J. Gama, M. Ferreira, J. Mendes-Moreira, and L. Damas, “Predicting Taxi–Passenger Demand Using Streaming Data,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1393–1402, Sep. 2013.
  10. H. T. Lam, E. Diaz-Aviles, A. Pascale, Y. Gkoufas, and B. Chen, “(Blue) Taxi Destination and Trip Time Prediction from Partial Trajectories.”
  11. T.-Y. Fu and W.-C. Lee, “Trembr: Exploring Road Networks for Trajectory Representation Learning,” in ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, vol. 11, Feb. 2020, pp. 1–25.
  12. G. Jin, M. Wang, J. Zhang, H. Sha, and J. Huang, “STGNN-TTE: Travel time estimation via spatial–temporal graph neural network,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 126, pp. 70–81, Jan. 2022.
  13. “https://people.cs.rutgers.edu/~dz220/Data.html,” Nov. 2022.
  14. W. Meert and M. Verbeke, “HMM with non-emitting states for Map Matching,” in European Conference on Data Analysis (ECDA), p. 1.
  15. A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, L. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,” in Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, ser. NIPS’17.   Red Hook, NY, USA: Curran Associates Inc., Dec. 2017, pp. 6000–6010.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.