Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
156 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

PointPCA+: Extending PointPCA objective quality assessment metric (2311.13880v1)

Published 23 Nov 2023 in cs.CV and eess.IV

Abstract: A computationally-simplified and descriptor-richer Point Cloud Quality Assessment (PCQA) metric, namely PointPCA+, is proposed in this paper, which is an extension of PointPCA. PointPCA proposed a set of perceptually-relevant descriptors based on PCA decomposition that were applied to both the geometry and texture data of point clouds for full reference PCQA. PointPCA+ employs PCA only on the geometry data while enriching existing geometry and texture descriptors, that are computed more efficiently. Similarly to PointPCA, a total quality score is obtained through a learning-based fusion of individual predictions from geometry and texture descriptors that capture local shape and appearance properties, respectively. Before feature fusion, a feature selection module is introduced to choose the most effective features from a proposed super-set. Experimental results show that PointPCA+ achieves high predictive performance against subjective ground truth scores obtained from publicly available datasets. The code is available at \url{https://github.com/cwi-dis/pointpca_suite/}.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (22)
  1. “Chapter 18 - subjective and objective quality assessment for volumetric video,” in Immersive Video Technologies, Giuseppe Valenzise, Martin Alain, Emin Zerman, and Cagri Ozcinar, Eds., pp. 501–552. Academic Press, 2023.
  2. “Point cloud quality assessment metric based on angular similarity,” in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), 2018, pp. 1–6.
  3. “Exploiting user interactivity in quality assessment of point cloud imaging,” in 2019 Eleventh International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), 2019, pp. 1–6.
  4. “Perceptual quality assessment of colored 3d point clouds,” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, pp. 1–1, 2022.
  5. “A color-based objective quality metric for point cloud contents,” in 2020 Twelfth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), 2020, pp. 1–6.
  6. “Towards a point cloud structural similarity metric,” in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Expo Workshops (ICMEW), 2020, pp. 1–6.
  7. “Inferring point cloud quality via graph similarity,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 3015–3029, 2022.
  8. “PCQM: A full-reference quality metric for colored 3d point clouds,” in 2020 Twelfth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), 2020, pp. 1–6.
  9. “Point cloud quality assessment based on geometry-aware texture descriptors,” Computers & Graphics, 2022.
  10. “Point cloud quality assessment: Dataset construction and learning-based no-reference metric,” ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications, vol. 19, no. 2s, pp. 1–26, 2023.
  11. “Progressive knowledge transfer based on human visual perception mechanism for perceptual quality assessment of point clouds,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.16646, 2022.
  12. “MM-PCQA: Multi-modal learning for no-reference point cloud quality assessment,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.00244, 2022.
  13. “Pointpca: Point cloud objective quality assessment using pca-based descriptors,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.12663, 2021.
  14. “Geometric distortion metrics for point cloud compression,” in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), 2017, pp. 3460–3464.
  15. ITU-R BT.709-6, “Parameter values for the HDTV standards for production and international programme exchange,” International Telecommunication Unionn, Jun. 2015.
  16. “Color and geometry texture descriptors for point-cloud quality assessment,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 28, pp. 1150–1154, 2021.
  17. “Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines,” Machine learning, vol. 46, pp. 389–422, 2002.
  18. “A comprehensive study of the rate-distortion performance in mpeg point cloud compression,” APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing, vol. 8, pp. e27, 2019.
  19. “Predicting the perceptual quality of point cloud: A 3d-to-2d projection-based exploration,” IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 23, pp. 3877–3891, 2020.
  20. “Basics: Broad quality assessment of static point clouds in compression scenarios,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.04796, 2023.
  21. “On the accuracy of objective image and video quality models: New methodology for performance evaluation,” in 2016 Eighth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), 2016, pp. 1–6.
  22. “ICIP 2023 - point cloud visual quality assessment grand challenge,” 2023.
Citations (8)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.