Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
38 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Igniting Language Intelligence: The Hitchhiker's Guide From Chain-of-Thought Reasoning to Language Agents (2311.11797v1)

Published 20 Nov 2023 in cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.CV, cs.HC, and cs.MA
Igniting Language Intelligence: The Hitchhiker's Guide From Chain-of-Thought Reasoning to Language Agents

Abstract: LLMs have dramatically enhanced the field of language intelligence, as demonstrably evidenced by their formidable empirical performance across a spectrum of complex reasoning tasks. Additionally, theoretical proofs have illuminated their emergent reasoning capabilities, providing a compelling showcase of their advanced cognitive abilities in linguistic contexts. Critical to their remarkable efficacy in handling complex reasoning tasks, LLMs leverage the intriguing chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning techniques, obliging them to formulate intermediate steps en route to deriving an answer. The CoT reasoning approach has not only exhibited proficiency in amplifying reasoning performance but also in enhancing interpretability, controllability, and flexibility. In light of these merits, recent research endeavors have extended CoT reasoning methodologies to nurture the development of autonomous language agents, which adeptly adhere to language instructions and execute actions within varied environments. This survey paper orchestrates a thorough discourse, penetrating vital research dimensions, encompassing: (i) the foundational mechanics of CoT techniques, with a focus on elucidating the circumstances and justification behind its efficacy; (ii) the paradigm shift in CoT; and (iii) the burgeoning of language agents fortified by CoT approaches. Prospective research avenues envelop explorations into generalization, efficiency, customization, scaling, and safety. This paper caters to a wide audience, including beginners seeking comprehensive knowledge of CoT reasoning and language agents, as well as experienced researchers interested in foundational mechanics and engaging in cutting-edge discussions on these topics. A repository for the related papers is available at https://github.com/Zoeyyao27/CoT-Igniting-Agent.

Overview of "Igniting Language Intelligence: The Hitchhiker's Guide From Chain-of-Thought Reasoning to Language Agents"

This paper provides a comprehensive survey on the advancements and applications of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning techniques in LLMs and their role in the evolution of language agents. It systematically explores the foundational mechanics of CoT techniques, delineates paradigm shifts within CoT, and examines the progression towards autonomous language agents.

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) Reasoning

CoT reasoning is a transformative technique enabling LLMs to perform complex reasoning tasks by generating intermediate reasoning steps. This method enhances interpretability, controllability, and flexibility, making LLMs more adept at solving intricate problems. The survey categorizes advancements in CoT into three primary dimensions: the foundational mechanics, paradigm shifts, and implications for language agents.

Foundational Mechanics

From an engineering standpoint, CoT is effective when an LLM with at least 20 billion parameters is employed, and the task requires multi-step reasoning. The training data must contain strongly interconnected knowledge clusters. Theoretically, CoT assists LLMs in identifying and connecting atomic knowledge pieces, thus enabling coherent reasoning steps.

Paradigm Shifts

The survey identifies significant paradigm shifts in CoT techniques:

  1. Prompting Pattern: Strategies evolved from manual prompt design to automatic prompt generation, enhancing zero-shot and few-shot capabilities.
  2. Reasoning Format: CoT has expanded into structured formats, including tree-like and table-like formulations, enabling more sophisticated reasoning processes.
  3. Application Scenario: CoT has been applied across multilingual and multimodal environments, extending its utility beyond traditional text tasks to include complex real-world scenarios.

Language Agents

Leveraging CoT reasoning, language agents have emerged, capable of interacting with real-world or simulated environments. These agents utilize CoT not only in reasoning but also in perception and memory operations. The capabilities are demonstrated in diverse fields such as autonomous control, interactive agents, and programming aids.

Numerical Results and Claims

The paper highlights substantial improvements in reasoning task performance due to CoT techniques. For example, notable gains in benchmark datasets like GSM8K and AQuA underscore CoT's utility in improving reasoning accuracy. Furthermore, the effectiveness of self-consistency techniques in enhancing CoT's impact on commonsense reasoning tasks is demonstrated.

Implications and Future Directions

The findings suggest that CoT has considerable potential in developing more advanced language agents, promoting autonomous and interactive capabilities. Future research is encouraged in the areas of generalization to unseen domains, enhancing agent efficiency, customization, and addressing safety concerns.

Conclusion

This survey provides an in-depth exploration of CoT reasoning, its paradigm shifts, and its transformative impact on language agents. The paper offers a forward-looking perspective on the integration of CoT techniques in LLMs, aiming to harness their full potential in AI development. The challenges outlined invite further inquiry into refining these models, ensuring their scalability, efficiency, and safety in increasingly complex environments.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (11)
  1. Zhuosheng Zhang (125 papers)
  2. Yao Yao (235 papers)
  3. Aston Zhang (48 papers)
  4. Xiangru Tang (62 papers)
  5. Xinbei Ma (19 papers)
  6. Zhiwei He (42 papers)
  7. Yiming Wang (141 papers)
  8. Mark Gerstein (25 papers)
  9. Rui Wang (996 papers)
  10. Gongshen Liu (37 papers)
  11. Hai Zhao (227 papers)
Citations (38)