Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
38 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

FlashDecoding++: Faster Large Language Model Inference on GPUs (2311.01282v4)

Published 2 Nov 2023 in cs.LG and cs.CL

Abstract: As the LLM becomes increasingly important in various domains. However, the following challenges still remain unsolved in accelerating LLM inference: (1) Synchronized partial softmax update. The softmax operation requires a synchronized update operation among each partial softmax result, leading to ~20% overheads for the attention computation in LLMs. (2) Under-utilized computation of flat GEMM. The shape of matrices performing GEMM in LLM inference is flat, leading to under-utilized computation and >50% performance loss after padding zeros in previous designs. (3) Performance loss due to static dataflow. Kernel performance in LLM depends on varied input data features, hardware configurations, etc. A single and static dataflow may lead to a 50.25% performance loss for GEMMs of different shapes in LLM inference. We present FlashDecoding++, a fast LLM inference engine supporting mainstream LLMs and hardware back-ends. To tackle the above challenges, FlashDecoding++ creatively proposes: (1) Asynchronized softmax with unified max value. FlashDecoding++ introduces a unified max value technique for different partial softmax computations to avoid synchronization. (2) Flat GEMM optimization with double buffering. FlashDecoding++ points out that flat GEMMs with different shapes face varied bottlenecks. Then, techniques like double buffering are introduced. (3) Heuristic dataflow with hardware resource adaptation. FlashDecoding++ heuristically optimizes dataflow using different hardware resource considering input dynamics. Due to the versatility of optimizations in FlashDecoding++, FlashDecoding++ can achieve up to 4.86x and 2.18x speedup on both NVIDIA and AMD GPUs compared to Hugging Face implementations. FlashDecoding++ also achieves an average speedup of 1.37x compared to state-of-the-art LLM inference engines on mainstream LLMs.

Insights into FlashDecoding++: Accelerating LLM Inference on GPUs

The burgeoning importance of LLMs across various domains has accentuated the necessity for efficient inference mechanisms, particularly on GPUs, which are pivotal for massive application deployments. The paper "FlashDecoding++: Faster LLM Inference on GPUs" addresses critical challenges such as synchronized partial softmax update, under-utilized computation in flat GEMM operations, and performance loss due to static dataflow, each of which imposes substantial overhead on LLM inference.

Key Innovations

1. Asynchronized Softmax with Unified Maximum Value

The paper introduces an innovative approach to mitigate overheads caused by synchronized updates in softmax operations. By leveraging a unified maximum value, different partial softmax computations can be individually managed, thus avoiding synchronization. This modification, which reduces latency in both the prefill and decoding stages of LLM inference, results in a measurable speedup—achieving 1.18×\times and 1.14×\times efficiency gains, respectively, by optimizing attention computation parallelism.

2. Flat GEMM Optimization via Double Buffering

Flat GEMMs often result from small batch sizes or singular interactions during the decoding phase. FlashDecoding++ noticeably enhances computation efficiency by double buffering techniques, adapting kernel operations to tackle varied matrix shapes and thus averting severe computation under-utilization. This approach delivers up to 52% speedup in decoding operations, improving resource allocation and throughput.

3. Heuristic Dataflow with Hardware Resource Adaptation

By dynamically adjusting to the input data features and hardware configurations, FlashDecoding++ refines kernel performance, addressing the 50.25% performance loss associated with static dataflows. Employing heuristic methods optimizes dataflows using resources like CUDA cores and Tensor Cores, providing up to a 29% increase in performance speed, highlighting adaptability as a vital factor in LLM inference efficiency.

Empirical Insights

The paper's empirical evaluations showcase FlashDecoding++’s capability of achieving remarkable speedups across both NVIDIA and AMD GPUs, with improvements reaching up to 4.86×\times on NVIDIA GPUs and 3.93×\times on AMD GPUs compared to Hugging Face implementations. Furthermore, the average speedup over existing state-of-the-art LLM inference engines, including FlashDecoding, is approximately 1.37×\times, underscoring its significant advancement in optimizing LLM deployment.

Implications and Future Directions

The integration of asynchronized softmax, flat GEMM optimization, and heuristic dataflow presents profound implications for AI development, enhancing throughput and minimizing computational latency—crucial for real-time applications. By considerably lowering inference costs, these methodologies will foster broader LLM adoption and scalability in industrial applications.

Looking ahead, further research into adaptive inference frameworks, perhaps leveraging emerging hardware or architecting more fluid computational models, may refine these techniques. The continual evolution of GPU architectures necessitates iterative improvements in software optimization strategies, ensuring congruence between hardware capabilities and algorithmic execution.

In conclusion, FlashDecoding++ represents a substantive contribution to the field of AI, particularly in terms of operational efficiency in LLM inference. This paper not only addresses existing bottlenecks but also establishes a foundation upon which future enhancements to LLM applications can be built.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (9)
  1. Ke Hong (8 papers)
  2. Guohao Dai (51 papers)
  3. Jiaming Xu (86 papers)
  4. Qiuli Mao (3 papers)
  5. Xiuhong Li (14 papers)
  6. Jun Liu (606 papers)
  7. Kangdi Chen (1 paper)
  8. Yuhan Dong (21 papers)
  9. Yu Wang (939 papers)
Citations (50)
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com