Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

DySurv: dynamic deep learning model for survival analysis with conditional variational inference (2310.18681v3)

Published 28 Oct 2023 in cs.LG

Abstract: Machine learning applications for longitudinal electronic health records often forecast the risk of events at fixed time points, whereas survival analysis achieves dynamic risk prediction by estimating time-to-event distributions. Here, we propose a novel conditional variational autoencoder-based method, DySurv, which uses a combination of static and longitudinal measurements from electronic health records to estimate the individual risk of death dynamically. DySurv directly estimates the cumulative risk incidence function without making any parametric assumptions on the underlying stochastic process of the time-to-event. We evaluate DySurv on 6 time-to-event benchmark datasets in healthcare, as well as 2 real-world intensive care unit (ICU) electronic health records (EHR) datasets extracted from the eICU Collaborative Research (eICU) and the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care database (MIMIC-IV). DySurv outperforms other existing statistical and deep learning approaches to time-to-event analysis across concordance and other metrics. It achieves time-dependent concordance of over 60% in the eICU case. It is also over 12% more accurate and 22% more sensitive than in-use ICU scores like Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores. The predictive capacity of DySurv is consistent and the survival estimates remain disentangled across different datasets. Our interdisciplinary framework successfully incorporates deep learning, survival analysis, and intensive care to create a novel method for time-to-event prediction from longitudinal health records. We test our method on several held-out test sets from a variety of healthcare datasets and compare it to existing in-use clinical risk scoring benchmarks.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (34)
  1. Lee MLT, Whitmore GA. Threshold regression for survival analysis: modeling event times by a stochastic process reaching a boundary. Statistical Science. 2006.
  2. Personalized donor-recipient matching for organ transplantation. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. vol. 31; 2017. .
  3. Deep learning for patient-specific kidney graft survival analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:170510245. 2017.
  4. Deep extended hazard models for survival analysis. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2021;34:15111-24.
  5. Time-to-event prediction with neural networks and Cox regression. arXiv preprint arXiv:190700825. 2019.
  6. DeepSurv: personalized treatment recommender system using a Cox proportional hazards deep neural network. BMC medical research methodology. 2018;18(1):1-12.
  7. Deephit: A deep learning approach to survival analysis with competing risks. In: Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. vol. 32; 2018. .
  8. Dynamic-deephit: A deep learning approach for dynamic survival analysis with competing risks based on longitudinal data. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 2019;67(1):122-33.
  9. Rnn-surv: A deep recurrent model for survival analysis. In: Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning–ICANN 2018: 27th International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, Rhodes, Greece, October 4-7, 2018, Proceedings, Part III 27. Springer; 2018. p. 23-32.
  10. Deep recurrent survival analysis. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. vol. 33; 2019. p. 4798-805.
  11. Deep learning based feature-level integration of multi-omics data for breast cancer patients survival analysis. BMC medical informatics and decision making. 2020;20:1-12.
  12. Improved survival analysis by learning shared genomic information from pan-cancer data. Bioinformatics. 2020;36(Supplement_1):i389-98.
  13. Using survival analysis to predict septic shock onset in ICU patients. Journal of Critical Care. 2018;48:339-44.
  14. Evidential sparsification of multimodal latent spaces in conditional variational autoencoders. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2020;33:10235-46.
  15. The SUPPORT prognostic model: Objective estimates of survival for seriously ill hospitalized adults. Annals of internal medicine. 1995;122(3):191-203.
  16. The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups. Nature. 2012;486(7403):346-52.
  17. Randomized 2 x 2 trial evaluating hormonal treatment and the duration of chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer patients. German Breast Cancer Study Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1994;12(10):2086-93.
  18. Breslow NE, Chatterjee N. Design and analysis of two-phase studies with binary outcome applied to Wilms tumour prognosis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics). 1999;48(4):457-68.
  19. Kvamme H, Borgan Ø. Continuous and discrete-time survival prediction with neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:191006724. 2019.
  20. Kvamme H, Borgan Ø. The brier score under administrative censoring: Problems and solutions. arXiv preprint arXiv:191208581. 2019.
  21. Mimic-iv. version 04) PhysioNet https://doi org/1013026/a3wn-hq05. 2020.
  22. XMI-ICU: Explainable Machine Learning Model for Pseudo-Dynamic Prediction of Mortality in the ICU for Heart Attack Patients. arXiv preprint arXiv:230506109. 2023.
  23. Attention-based deep recurrent model for survival prediction. ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare. 2021;2(4):1-18.
  24. Tsiatis AA, Davidian M. Joint modeling of longitudinal and time-to-event data: an overview. Statistica Sinica. 2004:809-34.
  25. Survival analysis part II: multivariate data analysis–an introduction to concepts and methods. British journal of cancer. 2003;89(3):431-6.
  26. Kingma DP, Welling M. Auto-encoding variational bayes. arXiv preprint arXiv:13126114. 2013.
  27. Learning patient-specific cancer survival distributions as a sequence of dependent regressors. Advances in neural information processing systems. 2011;24.
  28. Gensheimer MF, Narasimhan B. A scalable discrete-time survival model for neural networks. PeerJ. 2019;7:e6257.
  29. Fotso S. Deep neural networks for survival analysis based on a multi-task framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:180105512. 2018.
  30. Comparison of risk prediction scoring systems for ward patients: a retrospective nested case-control study. Critical Care. 2014;18:1-9.
  31. Survival of critically ill patients hospitalized in and out of intensive care units under paucity of intensive care unit beds. Critical care medicine. 2004;32(8):1654-61.
  32. Deep survival machines: Fully parametric survival regression and representation learning for censored data with competing risks. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics. 2021;25(8):3163-75.
  33. Regularizing the Deepsurv network using projection loss for medical risk assessment. IEEE Access. 2022;10:8005-20.
  34. Friedman M. Piecewise exponential models for survival data with covariates. The Annals of Statistics. 1982;10(1):101-13.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Munib Mesinovic (6 papers)
  2. Peter Watkinson (7 papers)
  3. Tingting Zhu (46 papers)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.