Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
AI Research Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 83 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 52 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 25 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 92 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 174 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 462 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Hall-magnetohydrodynamic simulations of X-ray photoevaporative protoplanetary disc winds (2310.01985v1)

Published 3 Oct 2023 in astro-ph.EP, astro-ph.HE, and astro-ph.SR

Abstract: Understanding the complex evolution of protoplanetary disks (PPDs) and their dispersal via energetic stellar radiation are prominent challenges in astrophysics. It has recently been established that specifically the X-ray luminosity from the central protostar can significantly heat the surface of the disk, causing powerful photoevaporative winds that eject a considerable fraction of the disc's mass. Recent work in the field has moreover shown the importance of global PPD simulations that simultaneously take into account non-ideal magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) effects and detailed thermochemistry. Our motivation with the current paper lies in combining these two aspects and figure out how they interact. Focus is put on the Hall Effect (HE) and the impact it has on the overall field topology and mass loss/accretion rates. Utilizing a novel X-ray temperature parametrisation, we perform 2D-axisymmetric MHD simulations with the NIRVANA fluid code, covering all non-ideal effects. We find that, in the aligned orientation, the HE causes prominent inward displacement of the poloidal field lines that can increase the accretion rate through a laminar Maxwell stress. We find that outflows are mainly driven by photoevaporation -- unless the magnetic field strength is considerable (i.e., $\beta_p\leq 10{3}$) or the X-ray luminosity low enough (i.e., $\log{L_X}\leq 29.3$). Inferred mass loss rate are in the range of the expected values $10{-8}$ to $10{-7}M_{\odot}yr{-1}$. For comparison, we have also performed pure hydrodynamic (HD) runs and compared them with the equivalent MHD runs. Here we have found that the magnetic field does indeed contribute to the mass loss rate, albeit only discernibly so for low enough $L_X$ (i.e., $\log{L_X}\leq 30.8$). For values higher than that, the wind mass loss predicted from the MHD set converges to the ones predicted from pure HD.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.