Multi-Stage Generalized Deferred Acceptance Mechanism: Strategyproof Mechanism for Handling General Hereditary Constraints (2309.10968v2)
Abstract: The theory of two-sided matching has been extensively developed and applied to many real-life application domains. As the theory has been applied to increasingly diverse types of environments, researchers and practitioners have encountered various forms of distributional constraints. Arguably, the most general class of distributional constraints would be hereditary constraints; if a matching is feasible, then any matching that assigns weakly fewer students at each college is also feasible. However, under general hereditary constraints, it is shown that no strategyproof mechanism exists that simultaneously satisfies fairness and weak nonwastefulness, which is an efficiency (students' welfare) requirement weaker than nonwastefulness. We propose a new strategyproof mechanism that works for hereditary constraints called the Multi-Stage Generalized Deferred Acceptance mechanism (MS-GDA). It uses the Generalized Deferred Acceptance mechanism (GDA) as a subroutine, which works when distributional constraints belong to a well-behaved class called hereditary M$\natural$-convex set. We show that GDA satisfies several desirable properties, most of which are also preserved in MS-GDA. We experimentally show that MS-GDA strikes a good balance between fairness and efficiency (students' welfare) compared to existing strategyproof mechanisms when distributional constraints are close to an M$\natural$-convex set.
- From matching with diversity constraints to matching with regional quotas. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS-2019), pages 377–385, 2019.
- Cutoff stability under distributional constraints with an application to summer internship matching. Mathematical Programming, 2022a. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-022-01917-1.
- Stable matching with uncertain pairwise preferences. Theoretical Computer Science, 909:1–11, 2022b.
- Matching market design with constraints. In Proceedings of the 36th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-2022), pages 12308–12316, 2022c.
- Impossibility of weakly stable and strategy-proof mechanism. Economics Letters, 217:110675, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110675.
- J. Drummond and C. Boutilier. Elicitation and approximately stable matching with partial preferences. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-2013), pages 97–105, 2013.
- School choice with controlled choice constraints: Hard bounds versus soft bounds. Journal of Economic Theory, 153:648–683, 2014.
- Strategyproof matching with minimum quotas. ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation, 4(1):6:1–6:40, 2015. doi: 10.1145/2841226. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/2841226.
- D. Gale and L. S. Shapley. College admissions and the stability of marriage. The American Mathematical Monthly, 69(1):9–15, 1962. doi: 10.2307/2312726.
- Designing matching mechanisms under general distributional constraints. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 9(2):226–262, 2017. doi: 10.1257/mic.20160124.
- Matching with contracts. American Economic Review, 95(4):913–935, 2005. doi: 10.1257/0002828054825466.
- On manipulablity of random serial dictatorship in sequential matching with dynamic preferences. In Proceedings of the 29th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-2015), pages 4168–4169, 2015.
- Weighted matching markets with budget constraints. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 65:393–421, 2019.
- Y. Kamada and F. Kojima. Efficient matching under distributional constraints: Theory and applications. American Economic Review, 105(1):67–99, 2015. doi: 10.1257/aer.20101552.
- Y. Kamada and F. Kojima. Stability concepts in matching under distributional constraints. Journal of Economic Theory, 168:107–142, 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2016.12.006.
- Y. Kawase and A. Iwasaki. Near-feasible stable matchings with budget constraints. In Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-2017), pages 242–248, 2017.
- Designing matching mechanisms under constraints: An approach from discrete convex analysis. Journal of Economic Theory, 176:803–833, 2018.
- Controlled school choice with soft bounds and overlapping types. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 58:153–184, 2017.
- T. Lu and C. Boutilier. Effective sampling and learning for mallows models with pairwise-preference data. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15:3963–4009, 2014.
- C. L. Mallows. Non-null ranking models. I. Biometrika, 44(1-2):114–130, 1957.
- K. Murota. Discrete convex analysis: A tool for economics and game theory. Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design, 1:151–273, 2016.
- K. Murota and A. Shioura. M-convex function on generalized polymatroid. Mathematics of Operations Research, 24(1):95–105, 1999.
- Two-Sided Matching: A Study in Game-Theoretic Modeling and Analysis (Econometric Society Monographs). Cambridge University Press, 1990.
- Strategyproof allocation mechanisms with endowments and M-convex distributional constraints. Artificial Intelligence, 315:103825, 2023.
- Strategyproof and fair matching mechanism for ratio constraints. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 34:1–29, 2020.
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.