Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 86 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 15 tok/s
GPT-5 High 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 102 tok/s
GPT OSS 120B 467 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 188 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Quantum Algorithm for Estimating Betti Numbers Using Cohomology Approach (2309.10800v3)

Published 19 Sep 2023 in quant-ph

Abstract: Topological data analysis has emerged as a powerful tool for analyzing large-scale data. An abstract simplicial complex, in principle, can be built from data points, and by using tools from homology, topological features could be identified. Given a simplex, an important feature is called the Betti numbers, which roughly count the number of holes' in different dimensions. Calculating Betti numbers exactly can be $\#$P-hard, and approximating them can be NP-hard, which rules out the possibility of any generic efficient algorithms and unconditional exponential quantum speedup. Here, we explore the specific setting of a triangulated manifold. In contrast to most known methods to estimate Betti numbers, which rely on homology, we exploit thedual' approach, namely, cohomology, combining the insight of the Hodge theory and de Rham cohomology. Our proposed algorithm can calculate its $r$-th normalized Betti number $\beta_r/|S_r|$ up to some additive error $\epsilon$ with running time $\mathcal{O}\Big(\frac{\log(|S_rK| |S_{r+1}K|)}{\epsilon2} \log (\log |S_rK|) \big( r\log |S_rK| \big) \Big)$, where $|S_r|$ is the number of $r$-simplexes in the given complex. For the estimation of $r$-th Betti number $\beta_r$ to a chosen multiplicative accuracy $\epsilon'$, our algorithm has complexity $ \mathcal{O}\Big(\frac{\log(|S_rK| |S_{r+1}K|)}{\epsilon'2} \big( \frac{ \Gamma}{\beta_r}\big)2 (\log |S_rK|) \log \big( r\log |S_rK| \big) \Big)$, where $\Gamma \leq |S_rK|$ can be chosen. A detailed analysis is provided, showing that our cohomology framework can even perform exponentially faster than previous homology methods in several regimes. In particular, our method is most effective when $\beta_r \ll |S_rK|$, which can offer more flexibility and practicability than existing quantum algorithms that achieve the best performance in the regime $\beta_r \approx |S_rK|$.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (25)
  1. Larry Wasserman. Topological data analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.08227, 2016.
  2. Peter Bubenik et al. Statistical topological data analysis using persistence landscapes. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 16(1):77–102, 2015.
  3. Genus zero surface conformal mapping and its application to brain surface mapping. IEEE Transaction on Medical Imaging (TMI), 23(8):949–958, 2004.
  4. Computational conformal geometry, volume 1. International Press Somerville, MA, 2008.
  5. Computational conformal geometry behind modern technologies. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 67(10):1509–1525, 2020.
  6. Quantum algorithms for topological and geometric analysis of data. Nature communications, 7(1):1–7, 2016.
  7. A Yu Kitaev. Quantum measurements and the abelian stabilizer problem. arXiv preprint quant-ph/9511026, 1995.
  8. Efficient quantum algorithms for simulating sparse hamiltonians. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 270(2):359–371, 2007.
  9. Quantum topological data analysis with linear depth and exponential speedup. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.02811, 2021.
  10. A streamlined quantum algorithm for topological data analysis with exponentially fewer qubits. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.12887, 2022.
  11. Review of a quantum algorithm for betti numbers. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.07673, 2019.
  12. Quantum persistent homology. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.12965, 2022.
  13. Complexity-theoretic limitations on quantum algorithms for topological data analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14286, 2022.
  14. Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations. Physical review letters, 103(15):150502, 2009.
  15. Quantum principal component analysis. Nature Physics, 10(9):631–633, 2014.
  16. Quantum algorithm for systems of linear equations with exponentially improved dependence on precision. SIAM Journal on Computing, 46(6):1920–1950, 2017.
  17. An improved method for quantum matrix multiplication. Quantum Information Processing, 22(8):299, 2023.
  18. Optimal hamiltonian simulation by quantum signal processing. Physical review letters, 118(1):010501, 2017.
  19. Hamiltonian simulation by qubitization. Quantum, 3:163, 2019.
  20. Quantum singular value transformation and beyond: exponential improvements for quantum matrix arithmetics. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 193–204, 2019.
  21. Differential forms in algebraic topology, volume 82. Springer, 1982.
  22. Quantum algorithm for data fitting. Physical review letters, 109(5):050505, 2012.
  23. Quantum amplitude amplification and estimation. Contemporary Mathematics, 305:53–74, 2002.
  24. Preconditioned quantum linear system algorithm. Physical review letters, 110(25):250504, 2013.
  25. Mikio Nakahara. Geometry, topology and physics. CRC press, 2018.
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.