Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
51 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
60 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
8 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

BLIVA: A Simple Multimodal LLM for Better Handling of Text-Rich Visual Questions (2308.09936v3)

Published 19 Aug 2023 in cs.CV, cs.AI, cs.CL, and cs.LG
BLIVA: A Simple Multimodal LLM for Better Handling of Text-Rich Visual Questions

Abstract: Vision LLMs (VLMs), which extend LLMs (LLM) by incorporating visual understanding capability, have demonstrated significant advancements in addressing open-ended visual question-answering (VQA) tasks. However, these models cannot accurately interpret images infused with text, a common occurrence in real-world scenarios. Standard procedures for extracting information from images often involve learning a fixed set of query embeddings. These embeddings are designed to encapsulate image contexts and are later used as soft prompt inputs in LLMs. Yet, this process is limited to the token count, potentially curtailing the recognition of scenes with text-rich context. To improve upon them, the present study introduces BLIVA: an augmented version of InstructBLIP with Visual Assistant. BLIVA incorporates the query embeddings from InstructBLIP and also directly projects encoded patch embeddings into the LLM, a technique inspired by LLaVA. This approach assists the model to capture intricate details potentially missed during the query decoding process. Empirical evidence demonstrates that our model, BLIVA, significantly enhances performance in processing text-rich VQA benchmarks (up to 17.76% in OCR-VQA benchmark) and in undertaking general (not particularly text-rich) VQA benchmarks (up to 7.9% in Visual Spatial Reasoning benchmark), and achieved 17.72% overall improvement in a comprehensive multimodal LLM benchmark (MME), comparing to our baseline InstructBLIP. BLIVA demonstrates significant capability in decoding real-world images, irrespective of text presence. To demonstrate the broad industry applications enabled by BLIVA, we evaluate the model using a new dataset comprising YouTube thumbnails paired with question-answer sets across 11 diverse categories. Our code and models are freely accessible at https://github.com/mlpc-ucsd/BLIVA.

An Expert Analysis of BLIVA: Enhancing Multimodal LLMs for Text-Rich Visual Question-Answering Tasks

The paper "BLIVA: A Simple Multimodal LLM for Better Handling of Text-Rich Visual Questions," offers a significant contribution to the field of Vision LLMs (VLMs) by extending LLMs with an enhanced comprehension of text within visual contexts. The challenge of integrating textual information present within images into LLMs remains a critical barrier in the deployment of these models in real-world applications, such as textual interpretation on road signs, product labels, or document images.

Novel Contributions

The work introduces BLIVA, a sophisticated adaptation of the InstructBLIP model, incorporating a Visual Assistant mechanism by blending query embeddings and encoded patch embeddings. This dual embedding strategy facilitates a deeper context capture from text-rich scenes, addressing the methodological limitations of prior models, which often rely on fixed query embeddings, thus limiting their scene understanding.

The paper demonstrates that by combining query embeddings and patch embeddings directly within the LLM input space, the model significantly improves text-rich visual perception. This is quantitatively corroborated by notable performance enhancements across several evaluations. Specifically, BLIVA achieves up to a 17.76% performance boost on the OCR-VQA benchmark and a 7.9% improvement in Visual Spatial Reasoning tasks over its precursor, InstructBLIP.

Performance Validation and Implications

BLIVA's effectiveness is measured against both text-rich and general VQA datasets. The results detailed in their experiments show that BLIVA outperformed existing models like mPLUG-Owl, LLaVA, and others on several challenging benchmarks, demonstrating superiority particularly in text-rich scenarios. The introduction of the YouTube thumbnail dataset, YTTB-VQA, further illustrates the model’s broad-ranging applicability to industry-relevant tasks—highlighting its potential for real-world deployments involving complex visual data.

The methodology employed by BLIVA proves vital in enhancing the interpretative capacity of VLMs, paving the way for more intricate interactions between AIs and visually-driven textual data. The inclusion of patch embeddings in tandem with learned query embeddings introduces a framework that can be readily adapted and scaled across varying LLM architectures, emphasizing its utility in multimodal instruction tuning.

Theoretical Insights and Future Directions

This research sheds light on the limitations of contemporary LLMs in dealing with text-rich visuals, offering a robust solution that could inspire future developments in the field. The architecture of BLIVA, emphasizing the importance of a multimodal instruction tuning paradigm, points toward a future where models could potentially autonomously adjust their embedding strategies based on the nature of the visual inputs.

The paper’s contributions also open avenues for exploring more efficient and scalable training paradigms that leverage diverse data sources, such as instructional data meta-learned across different modalities. Additionally, the possibility of extending BLIVA’s architecture to other modalities, beyond imagery, could be an exciting research directive, aligning with concurrent advances in general-purpose AI agents.

In conclusion, the research offers a substantial advancement in the multimodal AI research space by providing tangible improvements in text-rich VQA tasks. As LLMs continue to integrate more complex data types, BLIVA's principles may well inform the design of the next generation of AI models, achieving a more nuanced understanding of our multimodal world.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (61)
  1. Flamingo: a visual language model for few-shot learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 35: 23716–23736.
  2. Openflamingo.
  3. LaTr: Layout-Aware Transformer for Scene-Text VQA. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 16548–16558.
  4. Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models. arXiv:2210.11416.
  5. InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuning. arXiv:2305.06500.
  6. Visual Dialog. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).
  7. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929.
  8. MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.13394.
  9. ImageBind: One Embedding Space To Bind Them All. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference (CVPR).
  10. MultiModal-GPT: A Vision and Language Model for Dialogue with Humans. arXiv:2305.04790.
  11. Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answering. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).
  12. Vizwiz grand challenge: Answering visual questions from blind people. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), 3608–3617.
  13. Unnatural Instructions: Tuning Language Models with (Almost) No Human Labor. arXiv:2212.09689.
  14. LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).
  15. Icdar2019 competition on scanned receipt ocr and information extraction. In 2019 International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), 1516–1520. IEEE.
  16. GQA: A New Dataset for Real-World Visual Reasoning and Compositional Question Answering. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).
  17. Funsd: A dataset for form understanding in noisy scanned documents. In 2019 International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition Workshops (ICDARW), volume 2, 1–6. IEEE.
  18. The hateful memes challenge: Detecting hate speech in multimodal memes. Advances in neural information processing systems (NeurIPS), 33: 2611–2624.
  19. Visual information extraction in the wild: practical dataset and end-to-end solution. In International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, 36–53. Springer.
  20. Mimic-it: Multi-modal in-context instruction tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05425.
  21. LAVIS: A One-stop Library for Language-Vision Intelligence. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 3: System Demonstrations), 31–41. Toronto, Canada: Association for Computational Linguistics.
  22. BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generation. In ICML.
  23. Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context. arXiv:1405.0312.
  24. Visual spatial reasoning. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (TACL), 11: 635–651.
  25. Visual Instruction Tuning.
  26. On the Hidden Mystery of OCR in Large Multimodal Models. arXiv:2305.07895.
  27. Decoupled weight decay regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101.
  28. IconQA: A New Benchmark for Abstract Diagram Understanding and Visual Language Reasoning. arXiv:2110.13214.
  29. Ok-vqa: A visual question answering benchmark requiring external knowledge. In Proceedings of the IEEE/cvf conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), 3195–3204.
  30. ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoning. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022, 2263–2279.
  31. Infographicvqa. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, 1697–1706.
  32. DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Images. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2200–2209.
  33. OCR-VQA: Visual Question Answering by Reading Text in Images. In ICDAR.
  34. Large-Scale Pretraining for Visual Dialog: A Simple State-of-the-Art Baseline. In Vedaldi, A.; Bischof, H.; Brox, T.; and Frahm, J.-M., eds., ECCV.
  35. OpenAI. 2023. GPT-4 Technical Report. arXiv:2303.08774.
  36. Im2Text: Describing Images Using 1 Million Captioned Photographs. In Shawe-Taylor, J.; Zemel, R.; Bartlett, P.; Pereira, F.; and Weinberger, K., eds., Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 24. Curran Associates, Inc.
  37. Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalization. arXiv:2110.08207.
  38. LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairs. arXiv:2111.02114.
  39. A-OKVQA: A Benchmark for Visual Question Answering using World Knowledge. arXiv.
  40. Conceptual Captions: A Cleaned, Hypernymed, Image Alt-text Dataset For Automatic Image Captioning. In Proceedings of ACL.
  41. TextCaps: a Dataset for Image Captioning with Reading Comprehension. arXiv:2003.12462.
  42. Towards vqa models that can read. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), 8317–8326.
  43. PandaGPT: One Model To Instruction-Follow Them All. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16355.
  44. EVA-CLIP: Improved Training Techniques for CLIP at Scale. arXiv:2303.15389.
  45. Stanford Alpaca: An Instruction-following LLaMA model. https://github.com/tatsu-lab/stanford˙alpaca.
  46. LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models. arXiv:2302.13971.
  47. CIDEr: Consensus-based image description evaluation. In 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 4566–4575.
  48. OFA: Unifying Architectures, Tasks, and Modalities Through a Simple Sequence-to-Sequence Learning Framework. CoRR, abs/2202.03052.
  49. On the general value of evidence, and bilingual scene-text visual question answering. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 10126–10135.
  50. Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions. arXiv:2212.10560.
  51. Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Tasks. arXiv:2204.07705.
  52. Finetuned language models are zero-shot learners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.01652.
  53. Improving Cross-Task Generalization with Step-by-Step Instructions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.04429.
  54. Video Question Answering via Gradually Refined Attention over Appearance and Motion. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 1645–1653.
  55. MultiInstruct: Improving Multi-Modal Zero-Shot Learning via Instruction Tuning. arXiv:2212.10773.
  56. Just ask: Learning to answer questions from millions of narrated videos. In International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 1686–1697.
  57. mPLUG-Owl: Modularization Empowers Large Language Models with Multimodality. arXiv:2304.14178.
  58. From image descriptions to visual denotations: New similarity metrics for semantic inference over event descriptions. Nlp.cs.illinois.edu.
  59. OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.01068.
  60. Judging LLM-as-a-judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena. arXiv:2306.05685.
  61. MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.10592.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (6)
  1. Wenbo Hu (55 papers)
  2. Yifan Xu (92 papers)
  3. Yi Li (482 papers)
  4. Weiyue Li (2 papers)
  5. Zeyuan Chen (40 papers)
  6. Zhuowen Tu (80 papers)
Citations (94)
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com