Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
156 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

KernelWarehouse: Towards Parameter-Efficient Dynamic Convolution (2308.08361v1)

Published 16 Aug 2023 in cs.CV and cs.LG

Abstract: Dynamic convolution learns a linear mixture of $n$ static kernels weighted with their sample-dependent attentions, demonstrating superior performance compared to normal convolution. However, existing designs are parameter-inefficient: they increase the number of convolutional parameters by $n$ times. This and the optimization difficulty lead to no research progress in dynamic convolution that can allow us to use a significant large value of $n$ (e.g., $n>100$ instead of typical setting $n<10$) to push forward the performance boundary. In this paper, we propose $KernelWarehouse$, a more general form of dynamic convolution, which can strike a favorable trade-off between parameter efficiency and representation power. Its key idea is to redefine the basic concepts of "$kernels$" and "$assembling$ $kernels$" in dynamic convolution from the perspective of reducing kernel dimension and increasing kernel number significantly. In principle, KernelWarehouse enhances convolutional parameter dependencies within the same layer and across successive layers via tactful kernel partition and warehouse sharing, yielding a high degree of freedom to fit a desired parameter budget. We validate our method on ImageNet and MS-COCO datasets with different ConvNet architectures, and show that it attains state-of-the-art results. For instance, the ResNet18|ResNet50|MobileNetV2|ConvNeXt-Tiny model trained with KernelWarehouse on ImageNet reaches 76.05%|81.05%|75.52%|82.51% top-1 accuracy. Thanks to its flexible design, KernelWarehouse can even reduce the model size of a ConvNet while improving the accuracy, e.g., our ResNet18 model with 36.45%|65.10% parameter reduction to the baseline shows 2.89%|2.29% absolute improvement to top-1 accuracy.

Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.