Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
194 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Push the Boundary of SAM: A Pseudo-label Correction Framework for Medical Segmentation (2308.00883v3)

Published 2 Aug 2023 in eess.IV

Abstract: Segment anything model (SAM) has emerged as the leading approach for zero-shot learning in segmentation tasks, offering the advantage of avoiding pixel-wise annotations. It is particularly appealing in medical image segmentation, where the annotation process is laborious and expertise-demanding. However, the direct application of SAM often yields inferior results compared to conventional fully supervised segmentation networks. An alternative approach is to use SAM as the initial stage to generate pseudo labels for further network training. However, the performance is limited by the quality of pseudo labels. In this paper, we propose a novel label correction framework to push the boundary of SAM-based segmentation. Our model utilizes a label quality evaluation module to distinguish between noisy labels and clean labels. This enables the correction of the noisy labels using an uncertainty-based self-correction module, thereby enriching the clean training set. Finally, we retrain the segmentation network with updated labels to optimize its weights for future predictions. One key advantage of our model is its ability to train deep networks using SAM-generated pseudo labels without relying on a set of expert-level annotations while attaining good segmentation performance. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed model on three public datasets, indicating its ability to improve segmentation accuracy and outperform baseline methods in label correction.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (59)
  1. Dataset of breast ultrasound images. Data in brief 28, 104863.
  2. Segment anything model (sam) enhanced pseudo labels for weakly supervised semantic segmentation. ArXiv abs/2305.05803. URL: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:258587943.
  3. SAM on medical images: A comprehensive study on three prompt modes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.00035 .
  4. All-in-SAM: from weak annotation to pixel-wise nuclei segmentation with prompt-based finetuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.00290 .
  5. Segment anything model (SAM) for digital pathology: Assess zero-shot segmentation on whole slide imaging. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.04155 .
  6. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929 .
  7. Weakly-supervised semantic segmentation via online pseudo-mask correcting. Pattern Recognition Letters 165, 33–38.
  8. Dropout as a bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning, in: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1050–1059.
  9. Training deep neural-networks using a noise adaptation layer, in: ICLR.
  10. Co-teaching: Robust training of deep neural networks with extremely noisy labels, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 8527–8537.
  11. Accuracy of segment-anything model (SAM) in medical image segmentation tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.09324 .
  12. Computer-vision benchmark segment-anything model (sam) in medical images: Accuracy in 12 datasets. URL: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:258558130.
  13. Non-local context encoder: Robust biomedical image segmentation against adversarial attacks, in: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 8417–8424.
  14. Using trusted data to train deep networks on labels corrupted by severe noise, in: Bengio, S., Wallach, H., Larochelle, H., Grauman, K., Cesa-Bianchi, N., Garnett, R. (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Curran Associates, Inc.
  15. When SAM meets medical images: An investigation of segment anything model (SAM) on multi-phase liver tumor segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08506 .
  16. Supervised uncertainty quantification for segmentation with multiple annotations, in: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Springer. pp. 137–145.
  17. Co-seg: An image segmentation framework against label corruption. URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2102.00523.pdf, arXiv:2102.00523.
  18. Accurate lung segmentation via network-wise training of convolutional networks, in: Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support. Springer, pp. 92--99.
  19. Semi-supervised semantic image segmentation with self-correcting networks, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 12715--12725.
  20. SAM struggles in concealed scenes--empirical study on ‘‘segment anything". arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.06022 .
  21. Segment anything is not always perfect: An investigation of SAM on different real-world applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.05750 .
  22. Segment anything is a good pseudo-label generator for weakly supervised semantic segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.01275 .
  23. Learning deep networks from noisy labels with dropout regularization, in: 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), IEEE. pp. 967--972.
  24. Self-supervised pretraining for 2D medical image segmentation, in: Computer Vision--ECCV 2022 Workshops: Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23--27, 2022, Proceedings, Part VII, Springer. pp. 472--484.
  25. Bayesian segnet: Model uncertainty in deep convolutional encoder-decoder architectures for scene understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.02680 .
  26. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 .
  27. Segment anything. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.02643 .
  28. Konya, 2020. Lung segmentation dataset. URL: https://www.kaggle.com/sandorkonya/ct-lung-heart-trachea-segmentation.
  29. Segment anything model for semi-supervised medical image segmentation via selecting reliable pseudo-labels. Available at SSRN 4477443 .
  30. Research on CT lung segmentation method of preschool children based on traditional image processing and resunet. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine 2022.
  31. Adaptive early-learning correction for segmentation from noisy annotations, in: 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 2596--2606.
  32. Learning to segment skin lesions from noisy annotations, in: Domain Adaptation and Representation Transfer and Medical Image Learning with Less Labels and Imperfect Data. Springer, pp. 207--215.
  33. Av-sam: Segment anything model meets audio-visual localization and segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.01836 .
  34. Self-supervised learning for few-shot medical image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 41, 1837--1848.
  35. Making deep neural networks robust to label noise: A loss correction approach, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1944--1952.
  36. An effective data refinement approach for upper gastrointestinal anatomy recognition, in: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Springer. pp. 43--52.
  37. U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation, in: International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention, Springer. pp. 234--241.
  38. SAM.MD: Zero-shot medical image segmentation capabilities of the segment anything model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.05396 .
  39. Joint segmentation and uncertainty visualization of retinal layers in optical coherence tomography images using bayesian deep learning, in: Computational Pathology and Ophthalmic Medical Image Analysis. Springer, pp. 219--227.
  40. Artificial intelligence system reduces false-positive findings in the interpretation of breast ultrasound exams. Nature Communications 12, 5645. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26023-2.
  41. Distilling effective supervision for robust medical image segmentation with noisy labels, in: Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention--MICCAI 2021: 24th International Conference, Strasbourg, France, September 27--October 1, 2021, Proceedings, Part I 24, Springer. pp. 668--677.
  42. Generalist vision foundation models for medical imaging: A case study of segment anything model on zero-shot medical segmentation. Diagnostics 13, 1947.
  43. Development of a digital image database for chest radiographs with and without a lung nodule: receiver operating characteristic analysis of radiologists’ detection of pulmonary nodules. American Journal of Roentgenology 174, 71--74.
  44. Training convolutional networks with noisy labels, in: 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015.
  45. An alternative to wsss? an empirical study of the segment anything model (sam) on weakly-supervised semantic segmentation problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.01586 .
  46. Segmentation of anatomical structures in chest radiographs using supervised methods: a comparative study on a public database. Medical Image Analysis 10, 19--40.
  47. Dataset of breast ultrasound images. Data in Brief 28, 104863. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340919312181, doi:10.1016/j.dib.2019.104863.
  48. Scaling-up remote sensing segmentation dataset with segment anything model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.02034 .
  49. Meta corrupted pixels mining for medical image segmentation, in: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Springer. pp. 335--345.
  50. Training noise-robust deep neural networks via meta-learning, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 4524--4533.
  51. Pseudo-label correction from pixel to image, in: 2022 4th International Conference on Advances in Computer Technology, Information Science and Communications (CTISC), IEEE. pp. 1--5.
  52. Learning from pixel-level label noise: A new perspective for semi-supervised semantic segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 31, 623--635.
  53. Characterizing label errors: Confident learning for noisy-labeled image segmentation, in: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Springer. pp. 721--730.
  54. Personalize segment anything model with one shot. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.03048 .
  55. How segment anything model (SAM) boost medical image segmentation? arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.03678 .
  56. Input augmentation with SAM: Boosting medical image segmentation with segmentation foundation model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.11332 .
  57. Distilling effective supervision from severe label noise, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 9294--9303.
  58. FCN based label correction for multi-atlas guided organ segmentation. Neuroinformatics 18, 319--331.
  59. Pick-and-learn: Automatic quality evaluation for noisy-labeled image segmentation, in: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Springer. pp. 576--584.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.