Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

How to Efficiently Adapt Large Segmentation Model(SAM) to Medical Images (2306.13731v1)

Published 23 Jun 2023 in cs.CV

Abstract: The emerging scale segmentation model, Segment Anything (SAM), exhibits impressive capabilities in zero-shot segmentation for natural images. However, when applied to medical images, SAM suffers from noticeable performance drop. To make SAM a real ``foundation model" for the computer vision community, it is critical to find an efficient way to customize SAM for medical image dataset. In this work, we propose to freeze SAM encoder and finetune a lightweight task-specific prediction head, as most of weights in SAM are contributed by the encoder. In addition, SAM is a promptable model, while prompt is not necessarily available in all application cases, and precise prompts for multiple class segmentation are also time-consuming. Therefore, we explore three types of prompt-free prediction heads in this work, include ViT, CNN, and linear layers. For ViT head, we remove the prompt tokens in the mask decoder of SAM, which is named AutoSAM. AutoSAM can also generate masks for different classes with one single inference after modification. To evaluate the label-efficiency of our finetuning method, we compare the results of these three prediction heads on a public medical image segmentation dataset with limited labeled data. Experiments demonstrate that finetuning SAM significantly improves its performance on medical image dataset, even with just one labeled volume. Moreover, AutoSAM and CNN prediction head also has better segmentation accuracy than training from scratch and self-supervised learning approaches when there is a shortage of annotations.

Efficiently Adapting Large Segmentation Models for Medical Imaging

This paper addresses the adaptation of large segmentation models (SAMs) to the domain of medical imaging, focusing on methodologies that enhance model efficiency and accuracy in handling medical image datasets. In particular, this paper examines the intricacies of applying SAMs, traditionally utilized in broader computer vision tasks, to the nuanced and high-stakes field of medical image segmentation. The authors propose techniques to optimize these models for improved performance in segmenting medical images without compromising computational efficiency or accuracy.

Methodological Insights

The paper details an adaptation process that emphasizes:

  1. Domain-Specific Training Adjustments: Adapting pre-trained segmentation models requires recalibrating the training processes to better fit the unique characteristics of medical imaging data. The emphasis is on refining model architectures to incorporate domain-specific features that play critical roles in the accurate segmentation of medical images.
  2. Efficient Data Utilization: Given the limited availability and costly nature of annotated medical imaging datasets, the paper underscores the importance of employing data-efficient methods such as transfer learning and semi-supervised learning strategies. By leveraging existing large datasets and combining them with smaller, domain-specific datasets, the models can achieve higher performance metrics.
  3. Optimization Techniques: The research explores optimization methodologies that reduce overfitting and enhance model generalization. Techniques such as fine-tuning and employing regularization methods are highlighted as key processes for successfully adapting SAMs to medical imaging.

Empirical Outcomes

The authors report several metrics affirming the effectiveness of their approach. Among these, the use of adapted SAMs demonstrated notable improvements in segmentation accuracy on benchmark medical imaging datasets. Precision rates showed significant increments when compared to baseline models not employing the proposed adaptations. Additionally, the computational efficiency was maintained, ensuring scalability for broader deployment across medical imaging tasks.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

Theoretically, this paper contributes to the understanding of how scalable models can be re-engineered to suit high-demand, specialized tasks without extensive modifications. The findings advocate for a paradigm where existing large-scale vision models can be viewed as adaptable starting points rather than final solutions, suggesting a shift in focus towards customization through minimal intervention techniques.

Practically, the deployment of these adapted segmentation models in clinical settings could enhance diagnostic processes, providing medical professionals with high-precision tools capable of interpreting complex imaging data swiftly and accurately. As medical imaging is integral to many diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, improvements in model efficiency and accuracy have direct positive implications for patient outcomes.

Future Directions

Future research may involve expanding the scope of adaptation to include other AI domains or exploring the integration of multimodal datasets to provide more holistic insights into patient health. The pursuit of fully automated, adaptive systems also poses a significant challenge, where further improvements in computational efficiency might play a pivotal role in enabling real-time processing capabilities in clinical environments.

In summary, this paper makes a substantive contribution to the field of medical imaging by demonstrating the feasibility and advantages of adapting large-scale segmentation models for specialized tasks. The authors provide a solid framework that balances model performance with computational demands, setting the stage for continued advancements in automated medical image analysis.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (31)
  1. “multi-atlas labeling beyond the cranial vault. https://www.synapse.org/#!Synapse:syn3193805/wiki/89480. Accessed: 2021-09-06.
  2. Deep learning techniques for automatic mri cardiac multi-structures segmentation and diagnosis: is the problem solved? IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 37(11):2514–2525, 2018.
  3. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:1877–1901, 2020.
  4. Contrastive learning of global and local features for medical image segmentation with limited annotations. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:12546–12558, 2020.
  5. Transunet: Transformers make strong encoders for medical image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.04306, 2021.
  6. Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation. In ECCV, 2018.
  7. A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations. In International conference on machine learning, pages 1597–1607. PMLR, 2020.
  8. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929, 2020.
  9. Swin unetr: Swin transformers for semantic segmentation of brain tumors in mri images. In International MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop, pages 272–284. Springer, 2021.
  10. Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 16000–16009, 2022.
  11. Momentum contrast for unsupervised visual representation learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 9729–9738, 2020.
  12. Accuracy of segment-anything model (sam) in medical image segmentation tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.09324, 2023.
  13. Semi-supervised contrastive learning for label-efficient medical image segmentation. In Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2021: 24th International Conference, Strasbourg, France, September 27–October 1, 2021, Proceedings, Part II 24, pages 481–490. Springer, 2021.
  14. Scaling up visual and vision-language representation learning with noisy text supervision. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 4904–4916. PMLR, 2021.
  15. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.
  16. Segment anything. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.02643, 2023.
  17. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014, Proceedings, Part V 13, pages 740–755. Springer, 2014.
  18. Segment anything in medical images. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.12306, 2023.
  19. Dinov2: Learning robust visual features without supervision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07193, 2023.
  20. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:27730–27744, 2022.
  21. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International conference on machine learning, pages 8748–8763. PMLR, 2021.
  22. Zero-shot text-to-image generation. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 8821–8831. PMLR, 2021.
  23. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention, pages 234–241. Springer, 2015.
  24. Release strategies and the social impacts of language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.09203, 2019.
  25. Medical sam adapter: Adapting segment anything model for medical image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.12620, 2023.
  26. Unified perceptual parsing for scene understanding. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), pages 418–434, 2018.
  27. Positional contrastive learning for volumetric medical image segmentation. In Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2021: 24th International Conference, Strasbourg, France, September 27–October 1, 2021, Proceedings, Part II 24, pages 221–230. Springer, 2021.
  28. Customized segment anything model for medical image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.13785, 2023.
  29. Psanet: Point-wise spatial attention network for scene parsing. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), pages 267–283, 2018.
  30. Scene parsing through ade20k dataset. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 633–641, 2017.
  31. Unet++: Redesigning skip connections to exploit multiscale features in image segmentation. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 39(6):1856–1867, 2019.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Xinrong Hu (14 papers)
  2. Xiaowei Xu (78 papers)
  3. Yiyu Shi (136 papers)
Citations (47)
Github Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com