Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 63 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 11 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 10 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 83 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 139 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 438 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

The secretary problem with items arriving according to a random permutation avoiding a pattern of length three (2307.10611v1)

Published 20 Jul 2023 in math.PR and math.CO

Abstract: In the classical secretary problem, $n$ ranked items arrive one by one, and each item's rank relative to its predecessors is noted. The observer must select or reject each item as it arrives, with the object of selecting the item of highest rank. For $M_n\in{0,1,\cdots, n-1}$, let $\mathcal{S}(n,M_n)$ denote the strategy whereby the observer rejects the first $M_n$ items, and then selects the first later-arriving item whose rank is higher than that of any of the first $M_n$ items (if such an item exists). If the ranked items arrive in a uniformly random order, it is well-known that the limiting optimal probability of success is $\frac1e$, which occurs if $M_n\sim\frac ne$. It has been shown that when the ranked items arrive according to certain non-uniform distributions on the set of permutations, $\frac1e$ serves as a lower bound for the optimal probability. There is a fundamental reason for this phenomenon. We consider certain distributions for which that reason does not apply. We begin by noting a cooked-up class of distributions for which $\mathcal{S}(n,M)$ yields the lowest possible probability of success -- namely $\frac1n$, for all $M$. We then consider the uniform distribution over all permutations avoiding a particular pattern of length three. In the case of the pattern 231 or 132, for any choice of $M_n$, the strategy $\mathcal{S}(n,M_n)$ yields the very same probability of success; namely $\frac{n+1}{2(2n-1)}$, which gives a limiting probability of $\frac14$. For the pattern 213, the optimal strategy is obtained for $M\in{0,1}$, also yielding a limiting probability of $\frac14$. For the pattern 123, the optimal strategy is obtained for $M=1$, yielding a limiting probability of $\frac34$. For the other two patterns, 312 and 321, an optimal strategy will yield a limiting probability of at least $\frac7{16}$.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.