Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
89 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Premium
50 tokens/sec
GPT-5 Medium
29 tokens/sec
GPT-5 High Premium
28 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
90 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Premium
55 tokens/sec
GPT OSS 120B via Groq Premium
468 tokens/sec
Kimi K2 via Groq Premium
207 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Maximizing Social Welfare in Score-Based Social Distance Games (2307.05061v1)

Published 11 Jul 2023 in cs.GT and cs.DS

Abstract: Social distance games have been extensively studied as a coalition formation model where the utilities of agents in each coalition were captured using a utility function u that took into account distances in a given social network. In this paper, we consider a non-normalized score-based definition of social distance games where the utility function u_v depends on a generic scoring vector v, which may be customized to match the specifics of each individual application scenario. As our main technical contribution, we establish the tractability of computing a welfare-maximizing partitioning of the agents into coalitions on tree-like networks, for every score-based function u_v. We provide more efficient algorithms when dealing with specific choices of u_v or simpler networks, and also extend all of these results to computing coalitions that are Nash stable or individually rational. We view these results as a further strong indication of the usefulness of the proposed score-based utility function: even on very simple networks, the problem of computing a welfare-maximizing partitioning into coalitions remains open for the originally considered canonical function u.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (39)
  1. In Satinder Singh & Shaul Markovitch, editors: Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI ’17, AAAI Press, pp. 342–348, 10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10608.
  2. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 66, pp. 625–653, 10.1613/jair.1.11808.
  3. Artificial Intelligence 312, p. 103768, 10.1016/j.artint.2022.103768.
  4. Nathanaël Barrot & Makoto Yokoo (2019): Stable and Envy-free Partitions in Hedonic Games. In Sarit Kraus, editor: Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI ’19, ijcai.org, pp. 67–73, 10.24963/ijcai.2019/10.
  5. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 62, pp. 315–371, 10.1613/jair.1.11211.
  6. Vittorio Bilò, Gianpiero Monaco & Luca Moscardelli (2022): Hedonic Games with Fixed-Size Coalitions. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI ’22, AAAI Press, pp. 9287–9295, 10.1609/aaai.v36i9.21156.
  7. Hans L. Bodlaender (1996): A Linear-Time Algorithm for Finding Tree-Decompositions of Small Treewidth. SIAM Journal on Computing 25(6), pp. 1305–1317, 10.1137/S0097539793251219.
  8. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, AAMAS ’20, IFAAMAS, Richland, SC, p. 1777–1779. Available at https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3398761.3398979.
  9. Niclas Boehmer & Edith Elkind (2020): Individual-Based Stability in Hedonic Diversity Games. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI ’20, AAAI Press, pp. 1822–1829, 10.1609/aaai.v34i02.5549.
  10. Niclas Boehmer & Edith Elkind (2020): Stable Roommate Problem With Diversity Preferences. In Amal El Fallah Seghrouchni, Gita Sukthankar, Bo An & Neil Yorke-Smith, editors: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS ’20, IFAAMAS, pp. 1780–1782. Available at https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3398761.3398980.
  11. Anna Bogomolnaia & Matthew O. Jackson (2002): The Stability of Hedonic Coalition Structures. Games and Economic Behavior 38(2), pp. 201–230, 10.1006/game.2001.0877.
  12. Sylvain Bouveret & Jérôme Lang (2008): Efficiency and Envy-freeness in Fair Division of Indivisible Goods: Logical Representation and Complexity. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 32, pp. 525–564, 10.1613/jair.2467.
  13. Cambridge University Press, 10.1017/CBO9781107446984.
  14. Simina Brânzei & Kate Larson (2011): Social Distance Games. In Toby Walsh, editor: Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI ’11, IJCAI/AAAI, pp. 91–96, 10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/IJCAI11-027.
  15. Martin Bullinger & Warut Suksompong (2023): Topological Distance Games. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI ’23, AAAI Press.
  16. Jiehua Chen, Robert Ganian & Thekla Hamm (2020): Stable Matchings with Diversity Constraints: Affirmative Action is beyond NP. In Christian Bessiere, editor: Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI ’20, ijcai.org, pp. 146–152, 10.24963/ijcai.2020/21.
  17. Springer, 10.1007/978-3-319-21275-3.
  18. Reinhard Diestel (2017): Graph Theory, 5th edition. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 10.1007/978-3-662-53622-3.
  19. Rodney G. Downey & Michael R. Fellows (2013): Fundamentals of Parameterized Complexity. Texts in Computer Science, Springer, 10.1007/978-1-4471-5559-1.
  20. Edith Elkind & Anisse Ismaili (2015): OWA-Based Extensions of the Chamberlin-Courant Rule. In Toby Walsh, editor: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference Algorithmic Decision Theory, ADT ’15, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 9346, Springer, pp. 486–502, 10.1007/978-3-319-23114-3_29.
  21. In Amal El Fallah Seghrouchni, Gita Sukthankar, Bo An & Neil Yorke-Smith, editors: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS ’20, IFAAMAS, pp. 1846–1848. Available at https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3398761.3399002.
  22. In Tomás Bures, Riccardo Dondi, Johann Gamper, Giovanna Guerrini, Tomasz Jurdzinski, Claus Pahl, Florian Sikora & Prudence W. H. Wong, editors: Proceedings of the 47th International Conference on Current Trends in Theory and Practice of Computer Science, SOFSEM ’21, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 12607, Springer, pp. 159–174, 10.1007/978-3-030-67731-2_12.
  23. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI ’22, AAAI Press, pp. 5034–5042, 10.1609/aaai.v36i5.20435.
  24. Robert Ganian & Viktoriia Korchemna (2021): The Complexity of Bayesian Network Learning: Revisiting the Superstructure. In Marc’Aurelio Ranzato, Alina Beygelzimer, Yann N. Dauphin, Percy Liang & Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, editors: Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NeurIPS ’21, Curran Associates, Inc., pp. 430–442. Available at https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2021/hash/040a99f23e8960763e680041c601acab-Abstract.html.
  25. Tomáš Gavenčiak, Martin Koutecký & Dušan Knop (2022): Integer programming in parameterized complexity: Five miniatures. Discrete Optimization 44(Part 1), p. 100596, 10.1016/j.disopt.2020.100596.
  26. Tesshu Hanaka & Michael Lampis (2022): Hedonic Games and Treewidth Revisited. In Shiri Chechik, Gonzalo Navarro, Eva Rotenberg & Grzegorz Herman, editors: Proceedings of the 30th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms, ESA ’22, Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics 244, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, pp. 64:1–64:16, 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2022.64.
  27. Matthew O. Jackson (2008): Social and economic networks. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 10.1515/9781400833993.
  28. Christos Kaklamanis, Panagiotis Kanellopoulos & Dimitris Patouchas (2018): On the Price of Stability of Social Distance Games. In Xiaotie Deng, editor: Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium Algorithmic Game Theory, SAGT ’18, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 11059, Springer, pp. 125–136, 10.1007/978-3-319-99660-8_12.
  29. Mehmet Karakaya (2011): Hedonic coalition formation games: A new stability notion. Mathematical Social Sciences 61(3), pp. 157–165, 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2011.03.004.
  30. Ton Kloks (1994): Treewidth: Computations and Approximations. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 842, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 10.1007/BFb0045375.
  31. Tuukka Korhonen (2021): A Single-Exponential Time 2-Approximation Algorithm for Treewidth. In: Proceedings of the 62nd IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS ’21, IEEE, pp. 184–192, 10.1109/FOCS52979.2021.00026.
  32. Daniel Lokshtanov (2015): Parameterized Integer Quadratic Programming: Variables and Coefficients. CoRR abs/1511.00310, 10.48550/arXiv.1511.00310. arXiv:https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.00310.
  33. Silviu Maniu, Pierre Senellart & Suraj Jog (2019): An Experimental Study of the Treewidth of Real-World Graph Data. In Pablo Barceló & Marco Calautti, editors: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Database Theory, ICDT ’19, Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics 127, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, pp. 12:1–12:18, 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2019.12.
  34. In Carles Sierra, editor: Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI ’17, ijcai.org, pp. 359–365, 10.24963/ijcai.2017/51.
  35. Masahiro Okubo, Tesshu Hanaka & Hirotaka Ono (2019): Optimal Partition of a Tree with Social Distance. In Gautam K. Das, Partha Sarathi Mandal, Krishnendu Mukhopadhyaya & Shin-Ichi Nakano, editors: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Algorithms and Computation, WALCOM ’19, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 11355, Springer, pp. 121–132, 10.1007/978-3-030-10564-8_10.
  36. Sebastian Ordyniak & Stefan Szeider (2013): Parameterized Complexity Results for Exact Bayesian Network Structure Learning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 46, pp. 263–302, 10.1613/jair.3744.
  37. Christos H. Papadimitriou (1994): Computational complexity. Addison-Wesley.
  38. Shao Chin Sung & Dinko Dimitrov (2007): On Myopic Stability Concepts for Hedonic Games. Theory and Decision 62(1), pp. 31–45, 10.1007/s11238-006-9022-2.
  39. Kevin Zemmer (2017): Integer Polynomial Optimization in Fixed Dimension. Doctoral thesis, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 10.3929/ethz-b-000241796.
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube