Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Multimodal Deep Learning for Personalized Renal Cell Carcinoma Prognosis: Integrating CT Imaging and Clinical Data (2307.03575v1)

Published 7 Jul 2023 in cs.CV and cs.AI

Abstract: Renal cell carcinoma represents a significant global health challenge with a low survival rate. This research aimed to devise a comprehensive deep-learning model capable of predicting survival probabilities in patients with renal cell carcinoma by integrating CT imaging and clinical data and addressing the limitations observed in prior studies. The aim is to facilitate the identification of patients requiring urgent treatment. The proposed framework comprises three modules: a 3D image feature extractor, clinical variable selection, and survival prediction. The feature extractor module, based on the 3D CNN architecture, predicts the ISUP grade of renal cell carcinoma tumors linked to mortality rates from CT images. A selection of clinical variables is systematically chosen using the Spearman score and random forest importance score as criteria. A deep learning-based network, trained with discrete LogisticHazard-based loss, performs the survival prediction. Nine distinct experiments are performed, with varying numbers of clinical variables determined by different thresholds of the Spearman and importance scores. Our findings demonstrate that the proposed strategy surpasses the current literature on renal cancer prognosis based on CT scans and clinical factors. The best-performing experiment yielded a concordance index of 0.84 and an area under the curve value of 0.8 on the test cohort, which suggests strong predictive power. The multimodal deep-learning approach developed in this study shows promising results in estimating survival probabilities for renal cell carcinoma patients using CT imaging and clinical data. This may have potential implications in identifying patients who require urgent treatment, potentially improving patient outcomes. The code created for this project is available for the public on: \href{https://github.com/Balasingham-AI-Group/Survival_CTplusClinical}{GitHub}

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (49)
  1. Fractal analysis of mr images in patients with chiari malformation: The importance of pre-processing. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 31, 63–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2016.07.005.
  2. Recurrent residual U-Net for medical image segmentation. J. Med. Imaging (Bellingham) 6, 014006. doi:https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.6.1.014006.
  3. Error and discrepancy in radiology: inevitable or avoidable? Insights Imaging 8, 171–182. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-016-0534-1.
  4. On the use of artificial neural networks for the analysis of survival data. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 8, 1071–1077. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/72.623209.
  5. Predicting survival time of lung cancer patients using radiomic analysis. Oncotarget 8, 104393–104407. doi:https://doi.org/10.18632%2Foncotarget.22251.
  6. Cox-nnet: An artificial neural network method for prognosis prediction of high-throughput omics data. PLoS Comput Biol 14, e1006076. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006076.
  7. Human, All Too Human? An All-Around Appraisal of the Artificial Intelligence Revolution in Medical Imaging. Front Psychol 12, 710982. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.710982.
  8. Impact of histology and tumor grade on clinical outcomes beyond 5 years of follow-up in a large cohort of renal cell carcinomas. Clinical Genitourinary Cancer 19, e280–e285. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2021.07.003.
  9. Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 34, 187–202. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x.
  10. Deep neural networks for survival analysis based on a multi-task framework doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1801.05512.
  11. A scalable discrete-time survival model for neural networks. PeerJ 7, e6257. doi:https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6257.
  12. Evaluating the yield of medical tests. JAMA 247, 2543–2546. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1982.03320430047030.
  13. The state of the art in kidney and kidney tumor segmentation in contrast-enhanced CT imaging: Results of the KiTS19 challenge. Med. Image Anal. 67, 101821. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2020.101821.
  14. The kits19 challenge data: 300 kidney tumor cases with clinical context, ct semantic segmentations, and surgical outcomes doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1904.00445.
  15. Prognostication in advanced cancer: update and directions for future research. Support Care Cancer 27, 1973–1984. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04727-y.
  16. Deepsurv: personalized treatment recommender system using a cox proportional hazards deep neural network. BMC Medical Research Methodology 18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0482-1.
  17. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1412.6980.
  18. Summary measure of discrimination in survival models based on cumulative/dynamic time-dependent roc curves. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 25, 2088–2102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280213515571.
  19. Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. Eur J Cancer 48, 441–446. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2011.11.036.
  20. Statistical Methods for Survival Data Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/0471458546.
  21. A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Med. Image Anal. 42, 60–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005.
  22. A comparison of deep learning performance against health-care professionals in detecting diseases from medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Digital Health 1, e271–e297. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30123-2.
  23. Classification of kidney tumor grading on preoperative computed tomography scans. 16th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare , 1–15.
  24. Artificial intelligence and machine learning for medical imaging: A technology review. Phys Med 83, 242–256. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.04.016.
  25. A Shallow Convolutional Neural Network Predicts Prognosis of Lung Cancer Patients in Multi-Institutional CT-Image Data. Nat Mach Intell 2, 274–282. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-020-0173-6.
  26. Multimodal deep learning, in: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning, Omnipress. p. 689–696. doi:https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3104482.3104569.
  27. Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient. volume 8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/0470011815.b2a15150.
  28. Torchio: A python library for efficient loading, pre-processing, augmentation and patch-based sampling of medical images in deep learning. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 208, 106236. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106236.
  29. Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge. International Journal of Computer Vision 115, 211–252. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y.
  30. Trends in renal-cell carcinoma incidence and mortality in the united states in the last 2 decades: A seer-based study. Clinical Genitourinary Cancer 17, 46–57.e5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2018.10.002.
  31. The isup system of staging, grading and classification of renal cell neoplasia. Journal of kidney cancer and VHL 1, 26. doi:https://doi.org/10.15586%2Fjkcvhl.2014.11.
  32. Mobilenetv2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks, in: 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 4510–4520. doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1801.04381.
  33. Colorectal Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 70, 7–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21601.
  34. Cyclical learning rates for training neural networks, pp. 464–472. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/WACV.2017.58.
  35. The international society of urological pathology (ISUP) vancouver classification of renal neoplasia. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 37, 1469–1489. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e318299f2d1.
  36. Global cancer statistics 2020: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians 71, 209–249. doi:https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660.
  37. Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1905.11946.
  38. N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 29, 1310–1320. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2010.2046908.
  39. On the c-statistics for evaluating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data. Statistics in Medicine 30, 1105–1117. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4154.
  40. Brain tumor mri images identification and classification based on the recurrent convolutional neural network. Measurement: Sensors , 100412doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2022.100412.
  41. Machine learning for survival analysis: A survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3214306.
  42. Deep learning provides a new computed tomography-based prognostic biomarker for recurrence prediction in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Radiother Oncol 132, 171–177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2018.10.019.
  43. WHO/ISUP classification, grading and pathological staging of renal cell carcinoma: standards and controversies. World J. Urol. 36, 1913–1926. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2447-8.
  44. Random forests based group importance scores and their statistical interpretation: Application for alzheimer's disease. Frontiers in Neuroscience 12. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00411.
  45. Deepmmsa: A novel multimodal deep learning method for non-small cell lung cancer survival analysis, in: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), pp. 1468–1472. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC52423.2021.9658891.
  46. A deep learning risk prediction model for overall survival in patients with gastric cancer: A multicenter study. Radiother Oncol 150, 73–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2020.06.010.
  47. A deep learning mr-based radiomic nomogram may predict survival for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with stage t3n1m0. Radiotherapy and Oncology 151, 1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2020.06.050.
  48. Deeplung: Deep 3d dual path nets for automated pulmonary nodule detection and classification , 673–681doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/WACV.2018.00079.
  49. International variations and trends in renal cell carcinoma incidence and mortality. European Urology 67, 519–530. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.002.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Maryamalsadat Mahootiha (1 paper)
  2. Hemin Ali Qadir (9 papers)
  3. Jacob Bergsland (5 papers)
  4. Ilangko Balasingham (17 papers)
Citations (4)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.