Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Artificial intelligence for diagnosing and predicting survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma: Retrospective multi-center study (2301.04889v1)

Published 12 Jan 2023 in eess.IV

Abstract: Background: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common renal-related tumor with high heterogeneity. There is still an urgent need for novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for ccRCC. Methods: We proposed a weakly-supervised deep learning strategy using conventional histology of 1752 whole slide images from multiple centers. Our study was demonstrated through internal cross-validation and external validations for the deep learning-based models. Results: Automatic diagnosis for ccRCC through intelligent subtyping of renal cell carcinoma was proved in this study. Our graderisk achieved aera the curve (AUC) of 0.840 (95% confidence interval: 0.805-0.871) in the TCGA cohort, 0.840 (0.805-0.871) in the General cohort, and 0.840 (0.805-0.871) in the CPTAC cohort for the recognition of high-grade tumor. The OSrisk for the prediction of 5-year survival status achieved AUC of 0.784 (0.746-0.819) in the TCGA cohort, which was further verified in the independent General cohort and the CPTAC cohort, with AUC of 0.774 (0.723-0.820) and 0.702 (0.632-0.765), respectively. Cox regression analysis indicated that graderisk, OSrisk, tumor grade, and tumor stage were found to be independent prognostic factors, which were further incorporated into the competing-risk nomogram (CRN). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses further illustrated that our CRN could significantly distinguish patients with high survival risk, with hazard ratio of 5.664 (3.893-8.239, p < 0.0001) in the TCGA cohort, 35.740 (5.889-216.900, p < 0.0001) in the General cohort and 6.107 (1.815 to 20.540, p < 0.0001) in the CPTAC cohort. Comparison analyses conformed that our CRN outperformed current prognosis indicators in the prediction of survival status, with higher concordance index for clinical prognosis.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (11)
  1. Siteng Chen (2 papers)
  2. Xiyue Wang (16 papers)
  3. Jun Zhang (1008 papers)
  4. Liren Jiang (2 papers)
  5. Ning Zhang (278 papers)
  6. Feng Gao (240 papers)
  7. Wei Yang (349 papers)
  8. Jinxi Xiang (14 papers)
  9. Sen Yang (191 papers)
  10. Junhua Zheng (6 papers)
  11. Xiao Han (127 papers)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.