Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
157 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
43 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Non-Contact Monitoring of Dehydration using RF Data Collected off the Chest and the Hand (2306.10130v1)

Published 16 Jun 2023 in eess.SP and cs.HC

Abstract: We report a novel non-contact method for dehydration monitoring. We utilize a transmit software defined radio (SDR) that impinges a wideband radio frequency (RF) signal (of frequency 5.23 GHz) onto either the chest or the hand of a subject who sits nearby. Further, another SDR in the closed vicinity collects the RF signals reflected off the chest (or passed through the hand) of the subject. Note that the two SDRs exchange orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) signal, whose individual subcarriers get modulated once it reflects off (passes through) the chest (the hand) of the subject. This way, the signal collected by the receive SDR consists of channel frequency response (CFR) that captures the variation in the blood osmolality due to dehydration. The received raw CFR data is then passed through a handful of ML classifiers which once trained, output the classification result (i.e., whether a subject is hydrated or dehydrated). For the purpose of training our ML classifiers, we have constructed our custom HCDDM-RF-5 dataset by collecting data from 5 Muslim subjects (before and after sunset) who were fasting during the month of Ramadan. Specifically, we have implemented and tested the following ML classifiers (and their variants): K-nearest neighbour (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), ensemble classifier, and neural network classifier. Among all the classifiers, the neural network classifier acheived the best classification accuracy, i.e., an accuracy of 93.8% for the proposed CBDM method, and an accuracy of 96.15% for the proposed HBDM method. Compared to prior work where the reported accuracy is 97.83%, our proposed non-contact method is slightly inferior (as we report a maximum accuracy of 96.15%); nevertheless, the advantages of our non-contact dehydration method speak for themselves.

Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.