Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 82 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 40 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 38 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 96 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 185 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 465 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 30 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Analyzing the time spectrum of supernova neutrinos to constrain their effective mass or Lorentz Invariance Violation (2304.12546v2)

Published 25 Apr 2023 in hep-ph

Abstract: We analyze the expected arrival time spectrum of supernova neutrinos using simulated luminosity and compute the expected number of events in future detectors such as the DUNE Far Detector and Hyper-Kamiokande. We develop a general method using minimum square statistics that can compute the sensitivity to any variable affecting neutrino time of flight. We apply this method in two different situations: First, we compare the time spectrum changes due to different neutrino mass values to put limits on electron (anti)neutrino effective mass. Second, we constrain Lorentz invariance violation through the mass scale, $M_{QG}$, at which it would occur. We consider two main neutrino detection techniques: 1. DUNE-like liquid argon TPC, for which the main detection channel is $\nu_e +\, {40}\mbox{Ar} \rightarrow e- +\, {40}\mbox{K}*$, related to the supernova neutronization burst; and 2. HyperK-like water Cherenkov detector, for which $\bar \nu_e + p \rightarrow e+ + n$ is the main detection channel. We consider a fixed supernova distance of 10~kpc and two different masses of the progenitor star: (i) 15~$M_\odot$ with neutrino emission time up to 0.3~s and (ii) 11.2~$M_\odot$ with neutrino emission time up to 10~s. The best mass limits at 3$\sigma$ are for $\mathcal{O}(1)$~eV. For $\nu_e$, the best limit comes from a DUNE-like detector if the mass ordering happens to be inverted. For $\bar \nu_e$, the best limit comes from a HyperK-like detector. The best limit for the Lorentz invariance violation mass scale at the 3$\sigma$ level considering a superluminal or subluminal effect is $M_{QG} \gtrsim 10{13}$~GeV ($M_{QG} \gtrsim 5 \times 10{5}$~GeV) for linear (quadratic) energy dependence.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.