Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
140 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Predicting the wall-shear stress and wall pressure through convolutional neural networks (2303.00706v1)

Published 1 Mar 2023 in physics.flu-dyn and stat.ML

Abstract: The objective of this study is to assess the capability of convolution-based neural networks to predict wall quantities in a turbulent open channel flow. The first tests are performed by training a fully-convolutional network (FCN) to predict the 2D velocity-fluctuation fields at the inner-scaled wall-normal location $y{+}_{\rm target}$, using the sampled velocity fluctuations in wall-parallel planes located farther from the wall, at $y{+}_{\rm input}$. The predictions from the FCN are compared against the predictions from a proposed R-Net architecture. Since the R-Net model is found to perform better than the FCN model, the former architecture is optimized to predict the 2D streamwise and spanwise wall-shear-stress components and the wall pressure from the sampled velocity-fluctuation fields farther from the wall. The dataset is obtained from DNS of open channel flow at $Re_{\tau} = 180$ and $550$. The turbulent velocity-fluctuation fields are sampled at various inner-scaled wall-normal locations, along with the wall-shear stress and the wall pressure. At $Re_{\tau}=550$, both FCN and R-Net can take advantage of the self-similarity in the logarithmic region of the flow and predict the velocity-fluctuation fields at $y{+} = 50$ using the velocity-fluctuation fields at $y{+} = 100$ as input with about 10% error in prediction of streamwise-fluctuations intensity. Further, the R-Net is also able to predict the wall-shear-stress and wall-pressure fields using the velocity-fluctuation fields at $y+ = 50$ with around 10% error in the intensity of the corresponding fluctuations at both $Re_{\tau} = 180$ and $550$. These results are an encouraging starting point to develop neural-network-based approaches for modelling turbulence near the wall in large-eddy simulations.

Citations (4)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.