Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 82 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 40 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 38 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 96 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 185 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 465 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 30 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Search for Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background from Massive Gravity in the NANOGrav 12.5-Year Data Set (2302.00229v1)

Published 1 Feb 2023 in gr-qc, astro-ph.CO, astro-ph.GA, astro-ph.HE, and hep-ph

Abstract: Gravitational waves offer a new window to probe the nature of gravity, including answering if the mediating particle, graviton, has a non-zero mass or not. Pulsar timing arrays measure stochastic gravitational wave background (SGWB) at $\sim1-100$~nanohertz. Recently, the North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves (NANOGrav) collaboration reported an uncorrelated common-spectrum process in their 12.5-year data set with no substantial evidence that the process comes from the SGWB predicted by general relativity. In this work, we explore the possibility of an SGWB from massive gravity in the data set and find that a massless graviton is preferred because of the relatively larger Bayes factor. Without statistically significant evidence for dispersion-related correlations predicted by massive gravity, we place upper limits on the amplitude of the SGWB for graviton mass smaller than $10{-23}$~eV as $A_{\rm{MG}}<3.21\times 10{-15}$ at $95\%$ confidence level.

Citations (34)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.