Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 91 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 52 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 95 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 214 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 466 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Weak Identification in Low-Dimensional Factor Models with One or Two Factors (2211.00329v2)

Published 1 Nov 2022 in econ.EM

Abstract: This paper describes how to reparameterize low-dimensional factor models with one or two factors to fit weak identification theory developed for generalized method of moments models. Some identification-robust tests, here called "plug-in" tests, require a reparameterization to distinguish weakly identified parameters from strongly identified parameters. The reparameterizations in this paper make plug-in tests available for subvector hypotheses in low-dimensional factor models with one or two factors. Simulations show that the plug-in tests are less conservative than identification-robust tests that use the original parameterization. An empirical application to a factor model of parental investments in children is included.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (43)
  1. Estimating the technology of children’s skill formation. Journal of Political Economy. Forthcoming.
  2. Estimation of the parameters of a single equation in a complete system of stochastic equations. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 20:46–63.
  3. Statistical inference in factor analysis. Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, pages 111–150.
  4. Andrews, D. (1999). Consistent moment selection procedures for generalized method of moments estimation. Econometrica, 67:543–564.
  5. Andrews, D. (2017). Identification-robust subvector inference. Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper 3005.
  6. Estimation and inference with weak, semi-strong, and strong identification. Econometrica, 80:2153–2211.
  7. Asymptotic size of Kleibergen’s LM and conditional LR tests for moment condition models. Econometric Theory, 33:1046–1080.
  8. Identification- and singularity-robust inference for moment condition models. Quantitative Economics, 10:1703–1746.
  9. Andrews, I. (2016). Conditional linear combination tests for weakly identified models. Econometrica, 84:2155–2182.
  10. Andrews, I. (2018). Valid two-step identification-robust confidence sets for GMM. Review of Economics and Statistics, 100:337–348.
  11. Conditional inference with a functional nuisance parameter. Econometrica, 84:1571–1612.
  12. A geometric approach to nonlinear econometric models. Econometrica, 84:1249–1264.
  13. Estimating the production function for human capital: Results from a randomized controlled trial in Colombia. American Economic Review, 110:48–85.
  14. Using the infrastructure of a conditional cash transfer programme to deliver a scalable integrated early child development programme in Colombia: A cluster randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal. 349, g5785.
  15. Human capital development and parental investment in India. The Review of Economic Studies, 87:2511–2541.
  16. Bai, J. (2003). Inferential theory for factor models of large dimension. Econometrica, 71:135–171.
  17. Statistical analysis of factor models of high dimension. Annals of Statistics, 40:436–465.
  18. Recovery of weak common factors by maximum likelihood and ordinary least squares estimation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38:25–56.
  19. Brown, T. (2015). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. Guilford Publications, 2 edition.
  20. 2001 Lawrence R. Klein lecture estimating distributions of treatment effects with an application to the returns to schooling and measurement of the effects of uncertainty on college choice. International Economic Review, 44:361–422.
  21. Arbitrage, factor structure, and mean-variance analysis on large asset markets. Econometrica, 51:1281–1304.
  22. A new method of projection-based inference in GMM with weakly identified nuisance parameters. Journal of Econometrics, 164:239–251.
  23. Cox, G. (2022). Weak identification with bounds in a class of minimum distance models. arXiv: 2012.11222.
  24. Formulating, identifying and estimating the technology of cognitive and noncognitive skill formation. Journal of Human Resources, 43:738–782.
  25. Estimating the technology of cognitive and noncognitive skill formation. Econometrica, 78:883–931.
  26. Dufour, J.-M. (1997). Some impossibility theorems in econometrics with applications to structural and dynamic models. Econometrica, 65:1365–1387.
  27. Finite sample limited information inference methods for structural equations and models with generated regressors. International Economic Review, 42:815–844.
  28. Freyaldenhoven, S. (2022). Factor models with local factors—determining the number of relevant factors. Journal of Econometrics, 229:80–102.
  29. Gorsuch, R. (2014). Factor Analysis: Classic Edition. Routledge.
  30. GEL statistics under weak identification. Journal of Econometrics, 170:331–349.
  31. Generalized empirical likelihood estimators and tests under partial, weak, and strong identification. Econometric Theory, 21:667–709.
  32. Generalized empirical likelihood tests in time series models with potential identification failure. Journal of Econometrics, 142:134–161.
  33. Estimation and inference with a (nearly) singular Jacobian. Quantitative Economics, 10:1019–1068.
  34. Harman, H. (1976). Modern Factor Analysis. University of Chicago Press, 3 edition.
  35. Understanding the mechanisms through which an influential early childhood program boosted adult outcomes. American Economic Review, 103:2052–2086.
  36. The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior. Journal of Labor Economics, 24:411–482.
  37. Kleibergen, F. (2005). Testing parameters in GMM without assuming that they are identified. Econometrica, 73:1103–1123.
  38. Onatski, A. (2012). Asymptotics of the principal components estimator of large factor models with weakly influential factors. Journal of Econometrics, 168:244–258.
  39. Otsu, T. (2006). Generalized empirical likelihood inference for nonlinear and time series models under weak identification. Econometric Theory, 22:513–527.
  40. GMM with weak identification. Econometrica, 68:1055–1096.
  41. Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: understanding concepts and applications. American Psychological Association.
  42. Williams, B. (2020). Identification of the linear factor model. Econometric Reviews, 39:92–109.
  43. Ximénez, C. (2006). A Monte Carlo study of recovery of weak factor loadings in confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 13:587–614.
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube