Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 86 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 22 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 73 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 206 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 469 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

A random matrix model for random approximate $t$-designs (2210.07872v3)

Published 14 Oct 2022 in quant-ph, math-ph, math.MP, and math.PR

Abstract: For a Haar random set $\mathcal{S}\subset U(d)$ of quantum gates we consider the uniform measure $\nu_\mathcal{S}$ whose support is given by $\mathcal{S}$. The measure $\nu_\mathcal{S}$ can be regarded as a $\delta(\nu_\mathcal{S},t)$-approximate $t$-design, $t\in\mathbb{Z}+$. We propose a random matrix model that aims to describe the probability distribution of $\delta(\nu\mathcal{S},t)$ for any $t$. Our model is given by a block diagonal matrix whose blocks are independent, given by Gaussian or Ginibre ensembles, and their number, size and type is determined by $t$. We prove that, the operator norm of this matrix, $\delta({t})$, is the random variable to which $\sqrt{|\mathcal{S}|}\delta(\nu_\mathcal{S},t)$ converges in distribution when the number of elements in $\mathcal{S}$ grows to infinity. Moreover, we characterize our model giving explicit bounds on the tail probabilities $\mathbb{P}(\delta(t)>2+\epsilon)$, for any $\epsilon>0$. We also show that our model satisfies the so-called spectral gap conjecture, i.e. we prove that with the probability $1$ there is $t\in\mathbb{Z}+$ such that $\sup{k\in\mathbb{Z}{+}}\delta(k)=\delta(t)$. Numerical simulations give convincing evidence that the proposed model is actually almost exact for any cardinality of $\mathcal{S}$. The heuristic explanation of this phenomenon, that we provide, leads us to conjecture that the tail probabilities $\mathbb{P}(\sqrt{\mathcal{S}}\delta(\nu\mathcal{S},t)>2+\epsilon)$ are bounded from above by the tail probabilities $\mathbb{P}(\delta(t)>2+\epsilon)$ of our random matrix model. In particular our conjecture implies that a Haar random set $\mathcal{S}\subset U(d)$ satisfies the spectral gap conjecture with the probability $1$.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (40)
  1. M. Oszmaniec, A. Sawicki and M. Horodecki “Epsilon-Nets, Unitary Designs, and Random Quantum Circuits” In IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 68.2, 2022, pp. 989–1015 DOI: 10.1109/TIT.2021.3128110
  2. “Quantum Circuits for Exact Unitary t𝑡titalic_t-Designs and Applications to Higher-Order Randomized Benchmarking” In PRX Quantum 2 American Physical Society, 2021, pp. 030339 DOI: 10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.030339
  3. “Investigating the limits of randomized benchmarking protocols” In Physical Review A 89.6 American Physical Society (APS), 2014 DOI: 10.1103/physreva.89.062321
  4. H. Huang, R. Kueng and J. Preskill “Predicting Many Properties of a Quantum System from Very Few Measurements” In Nature Physics 16.10 Springer ScienceBusiness Media LLC, 2020, pp. 1050–1057 DOI: 10.1038/s41567-020-0932-7
  5. “Decoupling with unitary approximate two-designs” In New Journal of Physics 15.5, 2013, pp. 053022 DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/15/5/053022
  6. “The mother of all protocols: restructuring quantum information’s family tree” In Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A 465.2108, 2009, pp. 2537–2563 DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2009.0202
  7. J. Radhakrishnan, M. Rötteler and P. Sen “Random measurement bases, quantum state distinction and applications to the hidden subgroup problem” In Algorithmica 55, 2009, pp. 490–516
  8. A. Sawicki, L. Mattioli and Z. Zimborás “Universality verification for a set of quantum gates” In Phys. Rev. A 105 American Physical Society, 2022, pp. 052602 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.105.052602
  9. L. Susskind “Three Lectures on Complexity and Black Holes” Springer Cham, 2020 arXiv:1810.11563 [hep-th]
  10. Daniel A. Roberts and Beni Yoshida “Chaos and complexity by design” In Journal of High Energy Physics 2017.4, 2017, pp. 121 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP04(2017)121
  11. M. Oszmaniec, M. Horodecki and N. Hunter-Jones “Saturation and recurrence of quantum complexity in random quantum circuits” In arXiv e-prints arXiv, 2022 DOI: 10.48550/ARXIV.2205.09734
  12. “Linear growth of quantum circuit complexity” In Nature Physics 18.5, 2022, pp. 528–532 arXiv:2106.05305
  13. “Classical and Quantum Tensor Product Expanders” In Quantum Info. Comput. 9.3 Paramus, NJ: Rinton Press, Incorporated, 2009, pp. 336–360 arXiv:0804.0011
  14. “Efficient Quantum Tensor Product Expanders and k-Designs” In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009, pp. 548–561 arXiv:0811.2597
  15. F.G.S.L. Brandão, A.W. Harrow and M. Horodecki “Local Random Quantum Circuits are Approximate Polynomial-Designs” In Communications in Mathematical Physics 346.2, 2016, pp. 397–434 DOI: 10.1007/s00220-016-2706-8
  16. “Approximate unitary t𝑡titalic_t-designs by short random quantum circuits using nearest-neighbor and long-range gates” In arXiv e-prints, 2018 arXiv:1809.06957 [quant-ph]
  17. J. Haferkamp “Random quantum circuits are approximate unitary t𝑡titalic_t-designs in depth O⁢(n⁢t5+o⁢(1))𝑂𝑛superscript𝑡5𝑜1O\left(nt^{5+o(1)}\right)italic_O ( italic_n italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 + italic_o ( 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT )” In Quantum 6 Verein zur Förderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften, 2022, pp. 795 DOI: 10.22331/q-2022-09-08-795
  18. “Improved spectral gaps for random quantum circuits: Large local dimensions and all-to-all interactions” In Phys. Rev. A 104 American Physical Society, 2021, pp. 022417 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.104.022417
  19. “Efficient Quantum Pseudorandomness with Nearly Time-Independent Hamiltonian Dynamics” In Phys. Rev. X 7 American Physical Society, 2017, pp. 021006 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.7.021006
  20. “Quantum homeopathy works: Efficient unitary designs with a system-size independent number of non-Clifford gates” In arXiv e-prints, 2020 arXiv:2002.09524 [quant-ph]
  21. S.F.E. Oliviero, L. Leone and A. Hamma “Transitions in entanglement complexity in random quantum circuits by measurements” In Physics Letters A 418, 2021, pp. 127721 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2021.127721
  22. “Quantum Chaos is Quantum” In Quantum 5 Verein zur Förderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften, 2021, pp. 453 DOI: 10.22331/q-2021-05-04-453
  23. “A spectral gap theorem in SU(d)” In J. Eur. Math. Soc. 14.5, 2012, pp. 1455–1511 DOI: 10.4171/JEMS/337
  24. F. Naud “Hecke operators and spectral gaps on compact lie groups”, 2016
  25. “Matrix concentration inequalities and efficiency of random universal sets of quantum gates” In arXiv e-prints, 2022 arXiv:2202.05371
  26. J.A. Tropp “An Introduction to Matrix Concentration Inequalities”, Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning Now Publishers Inc, 2015 arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1501.01571
  27. “Chapter 8 - Local Operator Theory, Random Matrices and Banach Spaces” In Handbook of the Geometry of Banach Spaces 1, 2001 DOI: 10.1016/S1874-5849(01)80010-3
  28. “Alice and Bob meet Banach: the interface of asymptotic geometric analysis and quantum information theory”, Mathematical surveys and monographs Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, 2017 URL: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2296008
  29. “Tensor product representations of general linear groups and their connections with Brauer algebras” In J. Algebra 166, 1994, pp. 529–567
  30. “Representations of Compact Lie Groups”, Graduate Texts in Mathematics Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2003 URL: https://books.google.pl/books?id=AfBzWL5bIIQC
  31. “Representation Theory: A First Course”, Graduate Texts in Mathematics Springer New York, 1991 URL: https://books.google.pl/books?id=TuQZAQAAIAAJ
  32. “Calculable lower bounds on the efficiency of universal sets of quantum gates” In arXiv e-prints arXiv, 2022 DOI: 10.48550/ARXIV.2201.11774
  33. A.Yavuz Oruc “On number of partitions of an integer into a fixed number of positive integers” In Journal of Number Theory 159, 2016, pp. 355–369 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2015.06.023
  34. D. Goldstein, R. Guralnick and R. Stong “A lower bound for the dimension of a highest weight module” In Representation Theory of the American Mathematical Society 21(20) arXiv, 2016 DOI: 10.48550/ARXIV.1603.03076
  35. H. Kesten “Symmetric Random Walks on Groups” In Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 92.2 American Mathematical Society, 1959, pp. 336–354 URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1993160
  36. A. Lubotzky, R. Phillips and P. Sarnak “Hecke operators and distributing points on S2. II” In Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 40 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company, 1987, pp. 401–420
  37. “Generating random density matrices” In Journal of Mathematical Physics 52.6, 2011, pp. 062201 arXiv:1010.3570
  38. “An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications” Wiley, 1957 URL: https://books.google.pl/books?id=BsSwAAAAIAAJ
  39. “Theory of group representations and applications” World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd., 1986
  40. F. Mezzadri “How to generate random matrices from the classical compact groups” In Notices of the American Mathematical Society 54, 2007, pp. 592–604 arXiv:math-ph/0609050
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 post and received 0 likes.