Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Deep learning for automatic head and neck lymph node level delineation provides expert-level accuracy (2208.13224v2)

Published 28 Aug 2022 in eess.IV and cs.CV

Abstract: Background: Deep learning (DL)-based head and neck lymph node level (HN_LNL) autodelineation is of high relevance to radiotherapy research and clinical treatment planning but still underinvestigated in academic literature. Methods: An expert-delineated cohort of 35 planning CTs was used for training of an nnU-net 3D-fullres/2D-ensemble model for autosegmentation of 20 different HN_LNL. A second cohort acquired at the same institution later in time served as the test set (n=20). In a completely blinded evaluation, 3 clinical experts rated the quality of DL autosegmentations in a head-to-head comparison with expert-created contours. For a subgroup of 10 cases, intraobserver variability was compared to the average DL autosegmentation accuracy on the original and recontoured set of expert segmentations. A postprocessing step to adjust craniocaudal boundaries of level autosegmentations to the CT slice plane was introduced and the effect on geometric accuracy and expert rating was investigated. Results: Blinded expert ratings for DL segmentations and expert-created contours were not significantly different. DL segmentations with slice plane adjustment were rated numerically higher (mean, 81.0 vs. 79.6,p=0.185) and DL segmentations without slice plane adjustment were rated numerically lower (77.2 vs. 79.6,p=0.167) than manually drawn contours. DL segmentations with CT slice plane adjustment were rated significantly better than DL contours without slice plane adjustment (81.0 vs. 77.2,p=0.004). Geometric accuracy of DL segmentations was not different from intraobserver variability (mean, 0.76 vs. 0.77, p=0.307). Conclusions: We show that a nnU-net 3D-fullres/2D-ensemble model can be used for highly accurate autodelineation of HN_LNL using only a limited training dataset that is ideally suited for large-scale standardized autodelineation of HN_LNL in the research setting.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (19)
  1. Thomas Weissmann (6 papers)
  2. Yixing Huang (40 papers)
  3. Stefan Fischer (17 papers)
  4. Johannes Roesch (1 paper)
  5. Sina Mansoorian (1 paper)
  6. Horacio Ayala Gaona (1 paper)
  7. Antoniu-Oreste Gostian (1 paper)
  8. Markus Hecht (4 papers)
  9. Sebastian Lettmaier (4 papers)
  10. Lisa Deloch (1 paper)
  11. Benjamin Frey (9 papers)
  12. Udo S. Gaipl (6 papers)
  13. Luitpold V. Distel (4 papers)
  14. Andreas Maier (394 papers)
  15. Heinrich Iro (1 paper)
  16. Sabine Semrau (7 papers)
  17. Christoph Bert (17 papers)
  18. Rainer Fietkau (16 papers)
  19. Florian Putz (15 papers)
Citations (26)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.