Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 80 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 21 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 86 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 454 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 160 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

A synthetic population of Wolf-Rayet stars in the LMC based on detailed single and binary star evolution models (2208.10194v1)

Published 22 Aug 2022 in astro-ph.SR and astro-ph.GA

Abstract: Without doubt, mass transfer in close binary systems contributes to the populations of Wolf-Rayet (WR) stars in the Milky Way and the Magellanic Clouds. However, the binary formation channel is so far not well explored. We want to remedy this by exploring large grids of detailed binary and single star evolution models computed with the publicly available MESA code, for a metallicity appropriate for the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). The binary models are calculated through Roche-lobe overflow and mass transfer, until the initially more massive star exhausts helium in its core. We distinguish models of WR and helium stars based on the estimated stellar wind optical depth. We use these models to build a synthetic WR population, assuming constant star formation. Our models can reproduce the WR population of the LMC to significant detail, including the number and luminosity functions of the main WR subtypes. We find that for binary fractions of 100% (50%), all LMC WR stars below $106\,L_{\odot}$ ($10{5.7}\,L_{\odot}$) are stripped binary mass donors. We also identify several insightful mismatches. With a single star fraction of 50\%, our models produce too many yellow supergiants, calling either for a larger initial binary fraction, or for enhanced mass-loss near the Humphreys-Davidson limit. Our models predict more long-period WR binaries than observed, arguably due to an observational bias towards short periods. Our models also underpredict the shortest-period WR binaries, which may have implications for understanding the progenitors of double black hole mergers. The fraction of binary produced WR stars may be larger than often assumed, and outline the risk to mis-calibrate stellar physics when only single star models are used to reproduce the observed WR stars.

Citations (4)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.