Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Merging Ontologies Algebraically (2208.08715v2)

Published 18 Aug 2022 in cs.AI, cs.DB, and cs.DM

Abstract: Ontology operations, e.g., aligning and merging, were studied and implemented extensively in different settings, such as, categorical operations, relation algebras, typed graph grammars, with different concerns. However, aligning and merging operations in the settings share some generic properties, e.g., idempotence, commutativity, associativity, and representativity, labeled by (I), (C), (A), and (R), respectively, which are defined on an ontology merging system $(\mathfrak{O},\sim,\merge)$, where $\mathfrak{O}$ is a set of the ontologies concerned, $\sim$ is a binary relation on $\mathfrak{O}$ modeling ontology aligning and $\merge$ is a partial binary operation on $\mathfrak{O}$ modeling ontology merging. Given an ontology repository, a finite set $\mathbb{O}\subseteq \mathfrak{O}$, its merging closure $\widehat{\mathbb{O}}$ is the smallest set of ontologies, which contains the repository and is closed with respect to merging. If (I), (C), (A), and (R) are satisfied, then both $\mathfrak{O}$ and $\widehat{\mathbb{O}}$ are partially ordered naturally by merging, $\widehat{\mathbb{O}}$ is finite and can be computed efficiently, including sorting, selecting, and querying some specific elements, e.g., maximal ontologies and minimal ontologies. We also show that the ontology merging system, given by ontology $V$-alignment pairs and pushouts, satisfies the properties: (I), (C), (A), and (R) so that the merging system is partially ordered and the merging closure of a given repository with respect to pushouts can be computed efficiently.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Xiuzhan Guo (4 papers)
  2. Arthur Berrill (2 papers)
  3. Ajinkya Kulkarni (18 papers)
  4. Kostya Belezko (2 papers)
  5. Min Luo (7 papers)
Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.