Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 78 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 42 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 28 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 28 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 80 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 127 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 471 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Physical Parameter Calibration (2208.00124v2)

Published 30 Jul 2022 in stat.ME, math.ST, and stat.TH

Abstract: Computer simulation models are widely used to study complex physical systems. A related fundamental topic is the inverse problem, also called calibration, which aims at learning about the values of parameters in the model based on observations. In most real applications, the parameters have specific physical meanings, and we call them physical parameters. To recognize the true underlying physical system, we need to effectively estimate such parameters. However, existing calibration methods cannot do this well due to the model identifiability problem. This paper proposes a semi-parametric model, called the discrepancy decomposition model, to describe the discrepancy between the physical system and the computer model. The proposed model possesses a clear interpretation, and more importantly, it is identifiable under mild conditions. Under this model, we present estimators of the physical parameters and the discrepancy, and then establish their asymptotic properties. Numerical examples show that the proposed method can better estimate the physical parameters than existing methods.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)