Experimental graybox quantum system identification and control (2206.12201v4)
Abstract: Understanding and controlling engineered quantum systems is key to developing practical quantum technology. However, given the current technological limitations, such as fabrication imperfections and environmental noise, this is not always possible. To address these issues, a great deal of theoretical and numerical methods for quantum system identification and control have been developed. These methods range from traditional curve fittings, which are limited by the accuracy of the model that describes the system, to machine learning methods, which provide efficient control solutions but no control beyond the output of the model, nor insights into the underlying physical process. Here we experimentally demonstrate a "graybox" approach to construct a physical model of a quantum system and use it to design optimal control. We report superior performance over model fitting, while generating unitaries and Hamiltonians, which are quantities not available from the structure of standard supervised machine learning models. Our approach combines physics principles with high-accuracy machine learning and is effective with any problem where the required controlled quantities cannot be directly measured in experiments. This method naturally extends to time-dependent and open quantum systems, with applications in quantum noise spectroscopy and cancellation.
- G. Leuchs and D. Bruss, Quantum information: from foundations to quantum technology applications (John Wiley & Sons, 2019).
- H. Y. Carr and E. M. Purcell, Effects of diffusion on free precession in nuclear magnetic resonance experiments, Physical Review 94, 630 (1954).
- L. Viola, E. Knill, and S. Lloyd, Dynamical decoupling of open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2417 (1999).
- K. Khodjasteh and L. Viola, Dynamically error-corrected gates for universal quantum computation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 080501 (2009).
- M. Abdelhafez, D. I. Schuster, and J. Koch, Gradient-based optimal control of open quantum systems using quantum trajectories and automatic differentiation, Phys. Rev. A 99, 052327 (2019).
- T. Caneva, T. Calarco, and S. Montangero, Chopped random-basis quantum optimization, Phys. Rev. A 84, 022326 (2011).
- D. Dong, Learning control of quantum systems, in Encyclopedia of Systems and Control (Springer International Publishing, 2021) pp. 1090–1096.
- R. S. Judson and H. Rabitz, Teaching lasers to control molecules, Physical Review Letters 68, 1500 (1992).
- P. A. Erdman and F. Noé, Driving black-box quantum thermal machines with optimal power/efficiency trade-offs using reinforcement learning, arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.04785 (2022).
- P. A. Erdman and F. Noé, Identifying optimal cycles in quantum thermal machines with reinforcement-learning, npj Quantum Information 8, 10.1038/s41534-021-00512-0 (2022).
- M. Papič and I. de Vega, Neural-network-based qubit-environment characterization, Physical Review A 105, 022605 (2022).
- D. F. Wise, J. J. Morton, and S. Dhomkar, Using deep learning to understand and mitigate the qubit noise environment, PRX Quantum 2, 010316 (2021).
- I. Khait, J. Carrasquilla, and D. Segal, Optimal control of quantum thermal machines using machine learning, Physical Review Research 4, L012029 (2022).
- J. Bausch and F. Leditzky, Quantum codes from neural networks, New Journal of Physics 22, 023005 (2020).
- J. Wang et al., Experimental quantum Hamiltonian learning, Nat. Phys. 13, 551 (2017).
- Practical Grey-box Process Identification (Springer London, 2006).
- A. Youssry, G. A. Paz-Silva, and C. Ferrie, Characterization and control of open quantum systems beyond quantum noise spectroscopy, npj Quantum Information 6, 1 (2020b).
- A. Youssry and H. I. Nurdin, Multi-axis control of a qubit in the presence of unknown non-Markovian quantum noise, Quantum Science and Technology 8, 015018 (2023), 2208.03058 .
- A. Youssry, G. A. Paz-Silva, and C. Ferrie, Noise detection with spectator qubits and quantum feature engineering, New Journal of Physics 25, 073004 (2023).
- E. Perrier, D. Tao, and C. Ferrie, Quantum geometric machine learning for quantum circuits and control, New Journal of Physics 22, 103056 (2020).
- T. Tieleman and G. Hinton, Lecture 6.5-rmsprop: Divide the gradient by a running average of its recent magnitude, COURSERA: Neural networks for machine learning 4, 26 (2012).
- A. Prencipe and K. Gallo, Electro- and thermo-optics response of x-cut thin film linbo3 waveguides, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 59, 1 (2023).
- F. Chollet et al., Keras, https://keras.io (2015).
- M. Schmidt and H. Lipson, Distilling free-form natural laws from experimental data, Science 324, 81 (2009).
- V. Losing, B. Hammer, and H. Wersing, Incremental on-line learning: A review and comparison of state of the art algorithms, Neurocomputing 275, 1261 (2018).
- K. Weiss, T. M. Khoshgoftaar, and D. Wang, A survey of transfer learning, Journal of Big data 3, 1 (2016).