Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 94 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 54 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 38 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 102 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 207 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 467 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Constraining high-redshift stellar-mass primordial black holes with next-generation ground-based gravitational-wave detectors (2204.11864v1)

Published 25 Apr 2022 in astro-ph.CO, astro-ph.HE, gr-qc, and hep-ph

Abstract: The possible existence of primordial black holes in the stellar mass window has received considerable attention because their mergers may contribute to current and future gravitational-wave detections. Primordial black hole mergers, together with mergers of black holes originating from Population~III stars, are expected to dominate at high redshifts ($z\gtrsim 10$). However the primordial black hole merger rate density is expected to rise monotonically with redshift, while Population~III mergers can only occur after the birth of the first stars. Next-generation gravitational-wave detectors such as Cosmic Explorer~(CE) and Einstein Telescope~(ET) can access this distinctive feature in the merger rates as functions of redshift, allowing for a direct measurement of the abundance of the two populations, and hence for robust constraints on the abundance of primordial black holes. We simulate four-months worth of data observed by a CE-ET detector network and perform hierarchical Bayesian analysis to recover the merger rate densities. We find that if the Universe has no primordial black holes with masses of $\mathcal{O}(10M_{\odot})$, the projected upper limit on their abundance $f_{\rm PBH}$ as a fraction of dark matter energy density may be as low as $f_{\rm PBH}\sim \mathcal{O}({10{-5}})$, about two orders of magnitude lower than current upper limits in this mass range. If instead $f_{\rm PBH}\gtrsim 10{-4}$, future gravitational wave observations would exclude $f_{\rm PBH}=0$ at the 95\% credible interval.

Citations (42)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.